A comparison between the impact of dynamic envelope control strategies on the buildings’ smart readiness indicator and modelled performance

被引:1
|
作者
Paydar, Meysam Akbari [1 ]
Robertson, Craig [2 ]
Burman, Esfandiar [1 ]
Mumovic, Dejan [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, London, United Kingdom
[2] Allford Hall Monaghan Morris, London, United Kingdom
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1177/01436244241306595
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Smart Readiness Indicator (SRI) was introduced in the revised EPBD (2018) to indicate how suitable a building is for smart operation. This study evaluates how varying functionality levels of dynamic envelope smart services, including movable shading control and window opening/closing control, impact the buildings’ SRI score and building performance. An office building located in London underwent both SRI assessment and performance simulation. Results revealed that changing the functionality levels of dynamic envelope services from the lowest to the highest resulted in only a 4.1% increase in the SRI score. Overall, the findings suggest a lack of significant correlation between the SRI score and the building’s projected performance. The variation in energy performance can be notably more pronounced than the alteration in the SRI score, or the adjustment in the SRI score may not necessarily induce a change in the building’s performance. Therefore, when undertaking the building design process, it is advisable to concurrently consider the SRI alongside the evaluation of building performance as well as the interaction between smart services and building design. This holistic approach is crucial for achieving an optimal design outcome. Practical application: Significant efforts have been made to develop smart building assessment schemes, which can be highly beneficial in promoting the integration of smart services into buildings, and comparing the smartness levels of different buildings. Typically, these assessment schemes use a qualitative approach, evaluating buildings based on the presence of various smart services and their corresponding control strategies. However, to achieve optimal performance, it is essential to coordinate both building design and smart services by considering the building’s quantitative performance in addition to the qualitative assessment methods. This holistic approach enables a better understanding of the mutual impact between building design and smart services, facilitating well-informed decision-making. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 250
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Impact of Dynamic Facades on Smart Readiness Indicator and User Satisfaction
    Luna-Navarro, Alessandra
    Welti, Andrea
    de la Barra, Pedro
    Martinez-Alcaraz, Pablo
    Porta, Matteo
    MULTIPHYSICS AND MULTISCALE BUILDING PHYSICS, IBPC 2024, VOL 3, 2025, 554 : 471 - 478
  • [2] Assessment of the potential correlation between Smart Readiness Indicator and energy performance in a dataset of buildings in South Tyrol
    Garzia, Federico
    Pernigotto, Giovanni
    Menegon, Diego
    Finozzi, Luca
    Klammsteiner, Ulrich
    Gasparella, Andrea
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 321
  • [3] A Comparison between Temperature Modeling Strategies in Smart Buildings
    Gorni, Domenico
    Castilla, Maria del Mar
    Alvarez, Jose Domingo
    Visioli, Antonio
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 IEEE 20TH CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES & FACTORY AUTOMATION (ETFA), 2015,
  • [4] Energy performance of control strategies for smart glazed windows applied to office buildings
    Krarti, Moncef
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 45
  • [5] The impact of an ideal dynamic building envelope on the energy performance of low energy office buildings
    Goia, Francesco
    Cascone, Ylenia
    RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH CONFERENCE, RERC 2014, 2014, 58 : 185 - 192
  • [6] A comparison of smart shading control strategies for better building energy performance
    Yao J.
    Wang B.
    Zheng R.Y.
    International Journal of Smart Home, 2016, 10 (12): : 107 - 116
  • [7] Performance Comparison between Scheduling Strategies for PEVs Charging in Smart Grids
    Graber, Giuseppe
    Massa, Giovanni
    Galdi, Vincenzo
    Calderaro, Vito
    Piccolo, Antonio
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS (ICRERA), 2015, : 1213 - 1218
  • [8] Impact of data for forecasting on performance of model predictive control in buildings with smart energy storage
    Langtry, Max
    Wichitwechkarn, Vijja
    Ward, Rebecca
    Zhuang, Chaoqun
    Kreitmair, Monika J.
    Makasis, Nikolas
    Conti, Zack Xuereb
    Choudhary, Ruchi
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2024, 320
  • [9] Impact of Dynamic Control Format Indicator on Downlink Throughput Performance in LTE System
    Rajesh, P.
    Madhusudana, C. K.
    Nagarajan, Prakash
    Hanumantha, Rakesh
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, INFORMATION, AND COMMUNICATION (ICEIC), 2018, : 134 - 137
  • [10] Performance comparison of nonlinear and intelligent control strategies on the ball and beam dynamic system
    Wagner, John R.
    Momot, Michael E.
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Dynamic Systems and Control Division (Publication) DSC, 1999, 67 : 487 - 501