Deep learning model for flood probabilistic forecasting considering spatiotemporal rainfall distribution and hydrologic uncertainty

被引:0
|
作者
Xiang, Xin [1 ]
Guo, Shenglian [1 ]
Li, Chenglong [1 ]
Sun, Bokai [1 ]
Liang, Zhiming [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources Engn & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] China Yangtze Power Cooperat Ltd, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Probabilistic flood forecasting; Spatiotemporal dual attention mechanism; Convolutional long short-term memory network; Quantile regression; Mean-variance estimation; PRECIPITATION BIASES; VARIANCE; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132879
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
How to consider the spatiotemporal distribution of rainfall and hydrologic uncertainty is crucial to enhance flood forecasting accuracy. This study integrates a spatiotemporal dual attention (SDA) mechanism and a recurrent encoding-decoding (RED) structure into a convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) network, and proposes a novel SDA-ConvLSTM-RED deep learning model for flood probabilistic forecasting. Two probabilistic forecasting methods, quantile regression (QR) and mean-variance estimation (MVE) are incorporated to quantify uncertainty and generate flood probabilistic forecasts. The uncontrolled interval basin between Xiangjiaba and Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) is selected as case study. The findings demonstrate that the SDA-ConvLSTM-RED model can effectively capture the spatiotemporal rainfall distribution, thereby enhance flood forecasting accuracy. Compared to the benchmark model (LSTM-RED), the SDA-ConvLSTM-RED model performs much better in flood event forecasting, with average Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients of 0.96 and 0.93 for 24 h and 120 h forecast horizons respectively, particularly in forecasting peak discharge and occurrence time. Both probabilistic forecasting methods significantly outperform than the deterministic forecasts, particularly when the probabilistic forecasts are within the 80 % confidence interval. A further comparison of the evaluation metrics for the two probabilistic forecasting methods reveals that the MVE method is more suitable for shorter-term flood probabilistic forecasts, while the QR method performs better for longer-term flood probabilistic forecasts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Method for Probabilistic Flood Forecasting Considering Rainfall and Model Parameter Uncertainties
    Jiang, Xiaolei
    Liang, Zhongmin
    Qian, Mingkai
    Zhan, Xuebin
    Chen, Yuanfang
    Li, Binquan
    Fu, Xiaolei
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2019, 24 (12)
  • [2] Probabilistic Flood Forecasting Using Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor with Ensemble Weather Forecasts
    Han, Shasha
    Coulibaly, Paulin
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2019, 20 (07) : 1379 - 1398
  • [3] Uncertainty Forecasting Model for Mountain Flood Based on Bayesian Deep Learning
    Wang, Songsong
    Xu, Ouguan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 47830 - 47841
  • [4] Hydrologic uncertainty for Bayesian probabilistic forecasting model based on BP ANN
    Cheng, Chun-tian
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    Li, Xiang-yang
    ICNC 2007: THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 197 - 201
  • [5] Radar rainfall nowcasting and flood forecasting based on deep learning
    Li J.
    Li L.
    Feng P.
    Tang R.
    Shuikexue Jinzhan/Advances in Water Science, 2023, 34 (05): : 673 - 684
  • [6] Probabilistic spatiotemporal wind speed forecasting based on a variational Bayesian deep learning model
    Liu, Yongqi
    Qin, Hui
    Zhang, Zhendong
    Pei, Shaoqian
    Jiang, Zhiqiang
    Feng, Zhongkai
    Zhou, Jianzhong
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 260
  • [7] Short-term probabilistic load forecasting method based on uncertainty estimation and deep learning model considering meteorological factors
    Li, Bin
    Mo, Yulu
    Gao, Feng
    Bai, Xiaoqing
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2023, 225
  • [8] Hydrologic uncertainty processor for probabilistic river stage forecasting
    Krzysztofowicz, R
    Kelly, KS
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (11) : 3265 - 3277
  • [9] Hydrologic uncertainty processor for probabilistic stage transition forecasting
    Krzysztofowicz, R
    Maranzano, CJ
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 293 (1-4) : 57 - 73
  • [10] Probabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecasting
    Murad, Abdulmajid
    Kraemer, Frank Alexander
    Bach, Kerstin
    Taylor, Gavin
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (23)