Client Perspectives on Contraceptive Care: A Systematic Review

被引:3
|
作者
Manzer, Jamie L. [1 ]
Carrillo-Perez, Amanda [1 ]
Tingey, Lauren [1 ]
Ouellette, Lexi [1 ]
Hogan, Clare [1 ]
Atkins, Nia [2 ]
Carmichael, Katherine [1 ]
Ramirez, Grace Guerrero [3 ]
Magee, Maggie M. [1 ]
Miller, Macy A. [1 ]
Nwankwo, Chidinma [1 ]
Reid, Simone [1 ]
Strelevitz, Tara [1 ]
Taylor, Vanessa [1 ]
Waddell, William [1 ]
Wong, Mindy [1 ]
Yuksel, Burak [1 ]
Blum, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Mathematica Inc, 111 E Wacker Dr 3000, Chicago, IL 60601 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Polit, Princeton, NJ USA
[3] Safety & Wellbeing Prevent Inst, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
FAMILY-PLANNING-SERVICES; DECISION-MAKING; WOMENS PREFERENCES; HEALTH CENTERS; US OFFICE; QUALITY; PATIENT; ADOLESCENTS; PERCEPTIONS; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.019
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Contraceptive care is an opportunity for providers to help clients achieve their reproductive health goals. Client-centeredness is a core element of quality care; however, evidence suggests that the provision of client-centered contraceptive counseling needs improvement. This systematic review summarizes recent evidence on client preferences related to contraceptive care, including how client-centered approaches inform outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus to identify articles published between December 1, 2016 and May 1, 2023. Studies that explored client preferences related to contraceptive counseling, education, and/or care, and how client-centered approaches impact clients' perceived experiences with their care were included. Results: Thirty-nine unique studies met inclusion criteria. Clients want a range of information about contraceptive methods tailored to their preferences through a variety of formats, before, during, and after their appointment. Clients desired providers with similar demographic backgrounds (gender, race, ethnicity) and life experiences (menstruation, contraceptive use, carceral system encounters) to themselves, and who are willing to offer continuous care. Clients reported greater satisfaction when providers engaged in shared decision-making, utilized decision support tools, and supported their autonomy, including prioritizing their family-building goals. When providers shared personal preferences or pressured clients to select one method over another, clients in turn, reported feeling conflicted about which method to select and some subsequently declined using any method. Discussion: The variation in client preferences highlight the importance of offering tailored, comprehensive information that supports decision-making, prioritizes client autonomy, and recognizes positive interpersonal relationships with providers. Trial Registration: Prospero: CRD42023414456 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/dis play_record.php?RecordID=414456 Am J Prev Med 2024;67(6S):S22-S31. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:S22 / S31
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Provider Perspectives on Contraceptive Care: A Systematic Review
    Manzer, Jamie L.
    Ouellette, Lexi
    Tingey, Lauren
    Carrillo-Perez, Amanda
    Hogan, Clare
    Atkins, Nia
    Carmichael, Katherine
    Ramirez, Grace Guerrero
    Magee, Maggie M.
    Miller, Macy A.
    Nwankwo, Chidinma
    Reid, Simone
    Strelevitz, Tara
    Taylor, Vanessa
    Waddell, William
    Wong, Mindy
    Yuksel, Burak
    Blum, Jennifer
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 67 (06) : S32 - S40
  • [2] Client and Provider Perspectives on Quality of Care A Systematic Review
    Williams, Jessica R.
    Gavin, Loretta E.
    Carter, Marion W.
    Glass, Evelyn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (02) : S93 - S106
  • [3] Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review
    Fox, Edith
    Reyna, Arlene
    Malcolm, Nikita M.
    Rosmarin, Rachel B.
    Zapata, Lauren B.
    Frederiksen, Brittni N.
    Moskosky, Susan B.
    Dehlendorf, Christine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 55 (05) : 691 - 702
  • [4] Reproductive empowerment and contraceptive self-care: a systematic review
    Burke, Holly M.
    Ridgeway, Kathleen
    Murray, Kate
    Mickler, Alexandria
    Thomas, Reana
    Williams, Katie
    SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2022, 29 (02)
  • [5] Contraceptive use and the risk of sexually transmitted infection: systematic review and current perspectives
    Deese, Jennifer
    Pradhan, Subarna
    Goetz, Hannah
    Morrison, Charles
    OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 9 : 91 - 112
  • [6] Primary Care Physicians' Perspectives of Their Role in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
    Lawrence, Renae A.
    McLoone, Jordana K.
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Cohn, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (10) : 1222 - 1236
  • [7] Primary Care Physicians’ Perspectives of Their Role in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
    Renae A. Lawrence
    Jordana K. McLoone
    Claire E. Wakefield
    Richard J. Cohn
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, 31 : 1222 - 1236
  • [8] Community professionals' management of client care: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Kolehmainen, Niina
    Francis, Jill
    Duncan, Edward
    Fraser, Cynthia
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2010, 15 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [9] Patient and families' perspectives on telepalliative care: A systematic integrative review
    Hayes Bauer, Eithne
    Schultz, Anders Nikolai Orsted
    Brandt, Frans
    Smith, Anthony C.
    Bollig, Georg
    Dieperink, Karin Brochstedt
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 38 (01) : 42 - 56
  • [10] A systematic review of client's perspectives on the cultural and racial awareness and responsiveness of mental health practitioners
    Sadusky, A.
    Yared, H.
    Patrick, P.
    Berger, E.
    CULTURE & PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 30 (03) : 567 - 605