Qualitative Diary Methods in Mental Health Research: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Research and Reporting

被引:3
|
作者
McCombie, Catherine [1 ]
Esponda, Georgina Miguel [1 ]
Schmidt, Ulrike [2 ,3 ]
Lawrence, Vanessa [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Hlth Serv & Populat Res, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Sect Eating Disorders, Dept Psychol Med, London, England
[3] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
关键词
diaries; qualitative; experience sampling; longitudinal; mental health; PAPER-AND-PENCIL; SUPPORT PROGRAM; EXPERIENCES; ADOLESCENTS; THERAPY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; MINDFULNESS; EQUIVALENCE; EXPLORATION; TRANSITION;
D O I
10.1027/1016-9040/a000511
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Qualitative diary methods (QDMs) have great potential for mental health research, as they provide rich data about experiences and phenomena as and when they happen, from the perspectives of participants themselves. They provide unique insight into behavior, cognitions, and change over time in greater depth and detail than other quantitative or qualitative methods might offer. This paper presents the results of a scoping review of QDMs in mental health research, aimed at clarifying how diary methods are used in mental health research, and outlining key decisions and considerations in planning and conducting a qualitative diary study. Forty-eight papers were reviewed, and the findings highlight different elements of QDMs. The research aims, suitability for participants, and ethical issues are first discussed, followed by elements of diary study design including diary format, administration, intervals, timeline, sample size, diary structure and guidance, and additional data collection methods. Finally, analysis approaches and the strengths and challenges of QDMs are reviewed. Discussion around the future of QDMs follows, including a checklist for conducting and reporting a qualitative diary study.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 16
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utilization and reporting of qualitative research methods in health services research in Germany: A scoping review on original research publications (2010-2019)
    Ullrich, Charlotte
    Queder, Annika
    Anders, Carolin
    Poss-Doering, Regina
    Noest, Stefan
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 173 : 75 - 84
  • [2] Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health
    Peters, Sarah
    EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH, 2010, 13 (02) : 35 - 40
  • [3] Priority setting in mental health research: a scoping review of participatory methods
    Guell, E.
    Benito-Amat, C.
    Molas-Gallart, J.
    MENTAL HEALTH & PREVENTION, 2023, 30
  • [4] Adherence to implementation strategy reporting recommendations in mental health: a scoping review
    Hooley, Cole
    Amano, Takashi
    Markovitz, Lara
    Proctor, Enola
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 13
  • [5] Adherence to implementation strategy reporting recommendations in mental health: a scoping review
    Hooley, Cole
    Amano, Takashi
    Markovitz, Lara
    Proctor, Enola
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [6] Exploring past research to move forward: a scoping review of aims, outcomes, and recommendations in parental mental illness qualitative research
    Piche, Genevieve
    Davidson, Gavin
    Dunkley-Smith, Addy
    Grant, Anne
    Yates, Scott
    Maybery, Darryl
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [7] Climate change and mental health research methods, gaps, and priorities: a scoping review
    Hwong, Alison R.
    Wang, Margaret
    Khan, Hammad
    Chagwedera, D. Nyasha
    Grzenda, Adrienne
    Doty, Benjamin
    Benton, Tami
    Alpert, Jonathan
    Clarke, Diana
    Compton, Wilson M.
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2022, 6 (03): : E281 - E291
  • [8] Gender inequality in the global mental health research workforce: a research authorship scoping review and qualitative study in Nepal
    Gurung, Dristy
    Sangraula, Manaswi
    Subba, Prasansa
    Poudyal, Anubhuti
    Mishra, Shelly
    Kohrt, Brandon A.
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (12):
  • [9] Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices, research gaps, and recommendations for the International Society for Quality of Life Research
    Sajobi, Tolulope T.
    Brahmbhatt, Ronak
    Chan, Eric K. H.
    Lix, Lisa M.
    Zumbo, Bruno D.
    Sawatzky, Richard
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 2 - 3
  • [10] Common practices for sociodemographic data reporting in digital mental health intervention research: a scoping review
    Kirvin-Quamme, Andrew
    Kissinger, Jennifer
    Quinlan, Laurel
    Montgomery, Robert
    Chernenok, Mariya
    Pirner, Maddison C.
    Pajarito, Sarah
    Rapoport, Stephanie
    Wicks, Paul
    Darcy, Alison
    Greene, Carolyn J.
    Robinson, Athena
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):