How do medical students deal with the topic of racism? A qualitative analysis of group discussions in Germany

被引:0
|
作者
Gerhards, Simon Matteo [1 ]
Schweda, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Div Eth Med, Oldenburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 11期
关键词
IMPLICIT RACIAL/ETHNIC BIAS; RACE; HEALTH; ANTIRACISM; SCIENCE; REFLECTIONS; DISPARITIES; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; ALLIES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0313614
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Anti-racism is part of the medical professional ethos. Nevertheless, racism pervades medicine on individual, institutional, and structural levels. The concept of habitus helps to understand deficiencies in enacting anti-racism in practice. We use a habitus-based framework to analyse how medical students in Germany deal with the topic of racism. The research questions are: What are medical students' understandings of racism? How do they deal with the topic in discussions? What difficulties do they face in such discussions?Methods In a qualitative-explorative research design, we conducted six online group discussions with 32 medical students from medical schools all over Germany. Data analysis combined qualitative methods from thematic qualitative content analysis and the documentary method.Results We identified five typical ways of dealing with the topic of racism in discussions. The first one ('scientistic') orientates action towards the idea of medicine as an objective science, justifies the use of racial categories as scientific, and defines racism based on intention. The second ('pragmatic') orientates action towards tacit rules of clinical practice, justifies the use of racialised categories as practical and defines racism as an interpersonal problem. The third ('subjectivist') lacks a clear orientation of action for dealing with the topic of racism and instead displays uncertainty and subjectivism in understanding racialised categorisations as well as racism. The fourth ('interculturalist') orientates action towards an ideal of intercultural exchange, understands racialised categorisations as representing cultural differences and interprets racism as prejudice against cultures. The fifth ('critical') orientates action towards sociological scholarship, understands racialised categorisations as social constructs and views racism as a structural problem.Conclusion The results presented help to understand preconditions of enacting anti-racism in medicine and point to difficulties and learning needs. The heterogenous ways of dealing with the topic require a differentiated approach in medical education.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How do students deal with difficult physiological knowledge?
    Colthorpe, Kay Louise
    Abe, Haruna
    Ainscough, Louise
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2018, 42 (04) : 555 - 564
  • [2] How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysis
    Laurent Pasquier
    Guy Minguet
    Sylvie Moisdon-Chataigner
    Pascal Jarno
    Philippe Denizeau
    Ginette Volf
    Sylvie Odent
    Grégoire Moutel
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2022, 30 : 320 - 331
  • [3] How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysis
    Pasquier, Laurent
    Minguet, Guy
    Moisdon-Chataigner, Sylvie
    Jarno, Pascal
    Denizeau, Philippe
    Volf, Ginette
    Odent, Sylvie
    Moutel, Gregoire
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (03) : 320 - 331
  • [4] How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysis
    Pasquier, Laurent
    Minguet, Guy
    Moisdon-Chataigner, Sylvie
    Jarno, Pascal
    Denizeau, Philippe
    Volf, Ginette
    Odent, Sylvie
    Moutel, Gregoire
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (SUPPL 1) : 565 - 565
  • [5] How do international medical graduates and colleagues perceive and deal with difficulties in everyday collaboration? A qualitative study
    Skjeggestad, Erik
    Norvoll, Reidun
    Sandal, Gro M.
    Gulbrandsen, Pal
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 45 (04) : 428 - 435
  • [6] How do teachers and students deal with conflict? An analysis of conflict resolution strategies and goals
    Ceballos-Vacas, Esperanza Maria
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Beatriz
    RIE-REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EDUCATIVA, 2023, 41 (02): : 551 - 572
  • [7] How to do it - Select medical students
    Powis, D
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7166): : 1149 - 1150
  • [8] BREAKING BAD NEWS: HOW DO MEDICAL STUDENTS DEAL WITH UNCERTAINTY SURROUNDING A PATIENT'S DEATH?
    Deep, K. S.
    Kizzee, A.
    Conigliaro, R. L.
    Feddock, C. A.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 : 32 - 33
  • [9] Benefits of focus group discussions beyond online surveys in course evaluations by medical students in the United States: a qualitative study
    Brandl, Katharina
    Rabadia, Soniya, V
    Chang, Alexander
    Mandel, Jess
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2018, 15 : 25
  • [10] How do prostitution customers value health and position health in their discussions? Qualitative analysis of online forums
    Regushevskaya, Elena
    Tuormaa, Tuija
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 42 (07) : 603 - 610