Bone Cement in Adult Hip and Knee Reconstruction: A Review of Commercially Available Options and Clinical Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Auran, Richard [1 ]
Movassaghi, Kamran [2 ]
Nam, Denis [3 ]
Heckmann, Nathanael [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Clin Orthoped, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Portland, OR 97213 USA
[2] USC, Keck Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
HIGH-VISCOSITY CEMENT; ACUTE-RENAL-FAILURE; MANTLE THICKNESS; ARTHROPLASTY; REVISION; MIGRATION; RISK; ASSOCIATION; REPLACEMENT; PENETRATION;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01232
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is used extensively in hip and knee arthroplasty. A thorough understanding of the basic chemistry underlying PMMA is important for orthopaedic surgeons because this underscores the specific way bone cement is used during surgery. Recently, clinical research has shed light on the various types of PMMA regarding the viscosity of the mixture and the effect of cement additives. These variations in composition may alter the clinical efficacy of implanted bone cement in hip and knee arthroplasty. Understanding these key differences will allow the surgeon to tailor the PMMA composition as needed to maximize outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty. This review will summarize the preclinical feature of PMMA, evaluate current and past commercially available bone cement options, analyze preclinical results and clinical outcomes of various bone cement types, and highlight future areas of research.
引用
收藏
页码:e1057 / e1066
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reconstruction of Severe Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty Management options and clinical outcomes
    Mogos, Stefan
    Viscopoleanu, George
    Dascalu, Monica
    Orfanu, Radu
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2018, 69 (08): : 2222 - 2224
  • [2] Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
    Mancino, Fabio
    Cacciola, Giorgio
    Di Matteo, Vincenzo
    De Marco, Davide
    Greenberg, Alexander
    Perisano, Carlo
    Malahias, M. A.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    Maccauro, Giulio
    De Martino, Ivan
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2020, 12 : 1 - 7
  • [3] Outcomes of adult urethroplasty with commercially available acellular matrix
    Pearlman, Amy Marcia
    Mujumdar, Vaidehi
    McAbee, Kara Elizabeth
    Terlecki, Ryan Patrick
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2018, 10 (11) : 351 - 355
  • [4] BONE CEMENT IN TOTAL HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
    Monzon, Rene A.
    Coury, John G.
    Disse, Gregory D.
    Lum, Zachary C.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2019, 7 (12)
  • [5] Compressive fatigue properties of a commercially available acrylic bone cement for vertebroplasty
    Ajaxon, Ingrid
    Persson, Cecilia
    BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2014, 13 (06) : 1199 - 1207
  • [6] Compressive fatigue properties of a commercially available acrylic bone cement for vertebroplasty
    Ingrid Ajaxon
    Cecilia Persson
    Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2014, 13 : 1199 - 1207
  • [7] Antibiotic Elution from Hip and Knee Acrylic Bone Cement Spacers: A Systematic Review
    Anagnostakos, Konstantinos
    Meyer, Christof
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [8] Safety and efficacy of commercially available demineralised bone matrix preparations: A critical review of clinical studies
    Drosos, Georgios I.
    Kazakos, Konstantinos I.
    Kouzoumpasis, Pavlos
    Verettas, Dionisios-Alexandros
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2007, 38 : S13 - S21
  • [9] Adult Reconstruction Hip and Knee Fellowship Program Content and Accessibility
    Gu, Alex
    Lehman, Jason D.
    Sardana, Aayushi
    Cohen, Jordan S.
    Richardson, Shawn S.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (06): : 1630 - 1633
  • [10] Surface Characterization and Clinical Review of Two Commercially Available Implants
    Galli, Silvia
    Jimbo, Ryo
    Andersson, Martin
    Bryington, Matthew
    Albrektsson, Tomas
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2013, 22 (05) : 507 - 518