Diagnostic performance of NIRADS on F-18 FDG PET/CT in the post-treatment assessment of head and neck malignancies - a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Datta, Deepanksha [1 ]
Selvakumar, B. [2 ]
Goel, Akhil Dhanesh [3 ]
Chhibber, Sanskriti [4 ]
Gupta, Tejpal [5 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Nucl Med, Jodhpur, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Basni Ind Area Phase 2, Jodhpur 342005, Rajasthan, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Community & Family Med, Jodhpur, India
[4] Bharathiar Univ, Human Genet, Coimbatore, India
[5] Tata Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Mumbai, India
关键词
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; Post-treatment assessment; NIRADS; F-18 FDG PET/CT scan; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PUBLICATION BIAS; TEST ACCURACY; CERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-025-07230-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NIRADS) categories using 2-deoxy 2-(Fluorine-18) fluoro D-glucose positron emission tomography integrated with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) to diagnose recurrence or treatment failure in the post-treatment assessment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods A systematic search of the indexed medical literature was conducted till 7 November 2024 using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar to include studies reporting post-treatment recurrence rates on F-18-FDG PET/CT as per the NIRADS criteria. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. We categorized patients with 'NI-RADS <= 2' as low risk of recurrence and 'NI-RADS >= 3' as high risk of recurrence. Diagnostic performance of NI-RADS was evaluated through weighted-pooling of standard metrics of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic Odd's ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve analysis. Results Out of 1632 records identified, 8 studies with 7 datasets were included, with over 1200 patients and over 1300 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans. All studies were retrospective, with presence of a risk for bias, publication bias and data heterogeneity. The time between treatment and F-18 FDG PET/CT assessment was 8-17 weeks. For combined sites (primary, nodal or distant sites), the ability of 'NIRADS >= 3' over 'NIRADS <= 2' to detect a recurrence was acceptable with a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.68 (95% Confidence Interval, CI 0.63-0.73), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92), 6.01 (95% CI, 2.9- 12.6) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.31- 0.71) respectively, with a DOR of 14.13 (95% CI, 9.78-20.42) and an area under the curve, AUC of 0.859 (Standard Error, SE -0.018) on SROC analysis Conclusion In F-18 FDG PET/CT done on post-treatment HNSCC patients, the diagnostic performance of NIRADS >= 3 categories over NIRADS <= 2 categories in detecting treatment failure or recurrence at combined primary, nodal or distant sites was acceptable, with a low certainty of evidence. The NIRADS categories, especially NIRADS >= 3 and NIRADS <= 2 categories should be routinely reported in post-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in HNSCC patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gupta, Tejpal
    Master, Zubin
    Kannan, Sadhana
    Agarwal, Jai Prakash
    Ghsoh-Laskar, Sarbani
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    Murthy, Vedang
    Budrukkar, Ashwini
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 (11) : 2083 - 2095
  • [2] Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tejpal Gupta
    Zubin Master
    Sadhana Kannan
    Jai Prakash Agarwal
    Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar
    Venkatesh Rangarajan
    Vedang Murthy
    Ashwini Budrukkar
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2011, 38 : 2083 - 2095
  • [3] DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF FDG-PET(CT) FOR POST-TREATMENT RESTAGING OF HEAD-NECK CANCERS: A META-ANALYSIS
    Gupta, T.
    Master, Z.
    Kannan, S.
    Agarwal, J. P.
    Ghosh-Laskar, S.
    Rangarajan, V.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S49 - S49
  • [4] Diagnostic performance and timing of post-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT for head and neck cancer surveillance: A meta-analysis of reported studies.
    Wong, Erin T.
    Dmytriw, Adam A.
    Yu, Eugene
    Waldron, John
    Fazelzad, Rouhi
    de Almeida, John
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    O'Sullivan, Brian
    Xu, Wei
    Huang, Shao Hui
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (12) : 47 - 47
  • [5] Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of recurrent gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Choi, Chang In
    Park, Jae Kyun
    Jeon, Tae Yong
    Kim, Dae-Hwan
    JOURNAL OF YEUNGNAM MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 40 : S37 - S46
  • [6] Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis; A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seong-Jang Kim
    Kyoungjune Pak
    Keunyoung Kim
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020, 27 : 2103 - 2115
  • [7] Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis; A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Seong-Jang
    Pak, Kyoungjune
    Kim, Keunyoung
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 2103 - 2115
  • [8] Diagnostic performances of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Dae-Hwan
    Kim, Seong-Jang
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 41 (06) : 533 - 539
  • [9] Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of colorectal focal FDG uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gyung Mo Son
    Seong-Jang Kim
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 456 - 463
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of colorectal focal FDG uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Son, Gyung Mo
    Kim, Seong-Jang
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (02) : 456 - 463