Surgical managements for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yan, Xinyu [1 ]
Xu, Meng [2 ]
Su, Fengjun [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Tradit Chinese Med Univ, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Hlth Technol Assessment Ctr, Evidence Based Social Sci Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Prov Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Jinan, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 11期
关键词
PARS-PLANA VITRECTOMY; SCLERAL BUCKLE; PNEUMATIC RETINOPEXY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0310859
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and objective Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is the most common ophthalmic emergency threatening vision, with an incidence ranging from 6.3 to 17.9 per 100,000 people per year. However, optimal surgical management of RRD remains controversial. This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of different surgical options in patients with RRD.Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of science for randomized controlled trials (RCT) from inception to 24th September 2023. Frequentist network meta-analyses with the random-effects model was used to synthesize data. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. And we performed the network meta-analysis utilizing R 4.1.3 software and Stata 16SE.Results A total of 19 RCTs enrolled 2589 eyes were included. With high-to-very low certainty of evidence, compared with pneumatic retinopexy (PR), scleral buckling (SB) (odd ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.30; 0.91]), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) (OR = 2.35, 95% CI [1.32; 4.20]), PPV+SB (OR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.32; 5.09]) and PPV combined with phacomulsification (PCV) (OR = 7.72, 95% CI [1.07; 55.87]) were more effect in improving primary reattachment rate; for postoperative 6-month vision, SB was superior to PPV+SB (mean difference (MD) = 0.14, 95% CI [0.01; 0.27]). When compared with SB, PPV (OR = 5.27, 95% CI [3.13; 8.86]) and PPV+SB (OR = 10.12, 95% CI [4.31; 23.77]) shows a higher incidence of postoperative cataract progression. Compared to PR, the same is true for PPV (OR = 7.51, 95% CI [3.33; 16.91]) and PPV+SB (OR = 14.43, 95% CI [4.97; 41.93]).Conclusions PR appears to be associated with a lower rate of primary reattachment rate and postoperative cataract progression. In view of the small sample sizes of the included studies and the low certainty of evidence, these findings must be interpreted with caution. A large number of high-quality trials should be conducted to verify the effects of different surgical techniques in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical Management of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Soni, Chetan
    Hainsworth, Dean P.
    Almony, Arghavan
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (07) : 1440 - 1447
  • [2] Surgical Complications of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Meta-Analysis
    Lv, Zhiping
    Li, Ying
    Wu, Yongzhong
    Qu, Yi
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [3] Primary Vitrectomy Versus Scleral Buckling for the Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
    Sun, Qiao
    Sun, Tao
    Xu, Yi
    Yang, Xiao-Lu
    Xu, Xun
    Wang, Bing-Shun
    Nishimura, Tetsuya
    Heimann, Heinrich
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2012, 37 (06) : 492 - 499
  • [4] Supplemental Scleral Buckle for the Management of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment by Pars Plana Vitrectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Rosenberg, Daniel M.
    Ghayur, Huphy S.
    Deonarain, Deven M.
    Sarohia, Gurkaran S.
    Phillips, Mark R.
    Garg, Sunir
    Bakri, Sophie J.
    Wykoff, Charles C.
    Chaudhary, Varun
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2022, 245 (02) : 101 - 110
  • [5] Retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mason, Ryan H.
    Minaker, Samuel A.
    Marafon, Samara B.
    Figueiredo, Natalia
    Hillier, Roxane J.
    Muni, Rajeev H.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 67 (04) : 950 - 964
  • [6] Incidence of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Europe - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Jeany Q.
    Welchowski, Thomas
    Schmid, Matthias
    Holz, Frank G.
    Finger, Robert P.
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2019, 242 (02) : 81 - 86
  • [7] Internal limiting membrane peeling in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Guohai
    Tzekov, Radouil
    Fang, Yan
    Tong, Yuhua
    Li, Wensheng
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):
  • [8] Comment on: Retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nie, Ke
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 68 (03) : 562 - 563
  • [9] Pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis of clinical features, surgical success rate, and prognostic factors
    Abdi, Fatemeh
    Aghajani, Ali
    Hemmati, Sara
    Moosavi, Delaram
    Gordiz, Arzhang
    Chaibakhsh, Samira
    Bayatiani, Emad Soleimani
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 71 (03) : 717 - 728
  • [10] Supplemental scleral buckle for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment by pars plana vitrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Deonarain, Deven
    Rosenberg, Daniel
    Ghayur, Huphy Saulah
    Phillips, Mark
    Chaudhary, Varun
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)