A comparative analysis of diversification of agricultural production among EU candidate countries and Eastern Partnership countries: An international perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Jankowska, Anna [1 ]
Hlavsa, Tomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Fac Econ, Dept Econ & Econ Policy Agribusiness, Poznan, Poland
[2] Czech Univ Life Sci, Fac Econ & Management, Dept Stat, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
PLOS ONE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
FARM DIVERSIFICATION; ADJUSTMENT STRATEGY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN-UNION; CAP REFORM; IMPACT; CHALLENGES; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0314471
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The volume and structure of agricultural production depend on many different factors, including environmental, climatic, weather, economic, development potential of the agricultural sector, but also on historical conditions, etc. This study aimed to determine the diversification of the obtained agricultural production per capita of the EU candidate countries (CC) and the Eastern Partnership countries (EPC), presenting the potential of the analysed countries in terms of selected products in the field of plant and animal production, as well as to present quantitative changes in production in the years 2011-2021. Food self-sufficiency indicators, cluster analysis using Ward's method, a synthetic measure of agricultural production development and a composite indicator were applied in the study, to show the diversity and position of the surveyed countries in terms of agricultural production per capita. The research revealed that Belarus and T & uuml;rkiye have the highest agricultural production potential. Belarus has the potential to be competitive on the market mainly of animal products. Three countries dominate the grain market: Moldova, Serbia and Ukraine. Countries where the agricultural sector does not play a significant role are primarily Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia and Montenegro.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional diversification of the use of agricultural production potential in the EU candidate and the Eastern partnership countries
    Jankowska, Anna
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [2] Comparative analysis of EU and candidate countries resource efficiency
    Kocak, Habib
    Cilingirturk, Ahmet Mete
    ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF THE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, 2011, 40 (02): : 166 - 175
  • [3] Competitive Position of EU Candidate Countries and Eastern Partnership Countries in Trading Fruit and Vegetables in the Single European Market
    Kupsik, Wiktor
    Pawlak, Karolina
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [4] The EU as a Promoter of Democracy in Eastern Partnership Countries
    Turchyn, Yaryna
    Ivasechko, Olha
    Tsebenko, Oleh
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN AFFAIRS, 2023, 23 (02) : 144 - 167
  • [5] EASTERN PARTNERSHIP: TRADE INTEGRATION OF THE EU TARGET COUNTRIES
    Gurova, Irina P.
    MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2018, 62 (03): : 86 - 97
  • [6] COMMONALITIES AND DISPARITIES AMONG THE EU CANDIDATE COUNTRIES
    Ungureanu, Clementina Ivan
    Ersoz, Filiz
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, 2010, 13 (03): : 173 - 186
  • [7] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TURKEY AND THE SELECTED EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES AGRICULTURAL SECTOR WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EU COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY
    Aksoylu, Deniz
    Orhan, Hacer Simay Karaalp
    JOURNAL OF MEHMET AKIF ERSOY UNIVERSITY ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES FACULTY, 2022, 9 (01): : 172 - 201
  • [8] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE EFFICIENCY OF INNOVATION PERFORMANCES AMONG THREE NON-EU COUNTRIES AND EU COUNTRIES
    Stojanovska, Slagjana
    MIRDEC-3RD 2017: CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SERVICE, ECONOMICS, BUSINESS AND EDUCATION, 2017, : 6 - 6
  • [9] The Differences in the Structure of Agricultural Production in EU Countries
    Tluczak, Agnieszka
    DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF BORDER AREAS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND POLAND, 2016, : 175 - 181
  • [10] INTEGRATION WITH THE EU: PROSPECTS FOR FOREIGN TRADE OF EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES
    Sepashvili, Eka
    STRATEGICA: LOCAL VERSUS GLOBAL, 2015, : 362 - 371