MATES in Manufacturing: A Cluster RCT Evaluation of a Workplace Suicide Prevention Program

被引:0
|
作者
Lamontagne, Anthony D. [1 ,2 ]
Lockwood, Christopher [3 ]
Mackinnon, Andrew [4 ]
Henry, David [5 ]
Cox, Laura [6 ]
Hall, Neil R. [7 ]
King, Tania L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Geelong, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Melbourne Sch Global & Populat Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, MATES Construct, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Mental Hlth & Community Wellbeing, Melbourne Sch Global & Populat Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Australian Mfg Workers Union AMWU, Granville, NSW, Australia
[6] MATES Construct, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Western Sydney Univ, Ctr Male Hlth, Sch Social Sci, Penrith, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cluster randomized; effectiveness; evaluation; experimental; implementation; intervention; manufacturing; prevention; suicide; trial; workplace;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.23698
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe MATES in Construction suicide prevention program was adapted to the manufacturing sector and evaluated in a pilot of the program.MethodsTen manufacturing worksites were randomly assigned to intervention (5 sites) and wait-list control (5 sites) conditions in a two-arm cluster randomized design. 1245 workers responded at baseline (87% response rate) and 648 at final (35% response rate). Literacy of Suicide Scale (LOSS) was assessed as a process outcome, and help-seeking intentions as the primary outcome (General Help-Seeking Questionnaire [GHSQ] score). Secondary outcomes included help sought, suicidal thoughts and likelihood of suicide attempt scores, and Kessler-6 scores. Linear mixed models for repeated measures were used in intention-to-treat (ITT) and completer analyses.ResultsAll sites finished the trial, with intervention periods ranging from 8 to 11 months; however, none of the five intervention sites fully implemented the intervention as planned. ITT analyses showed an improvement in LOSS scores within the intervention group (0.49, 95% CI 0.13-0.49), but the mean difference in change between intervention and control included the null (0.34, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.80). The primary outcome of GHSQ scores also improved within the intervention group, but the difference in change included the null (mean difference 1.52, 95% CI -0.69 to 3.74). No secondary outcomes improved relative to control in ITT or completers analyses. Exploratory analysis of disaggregated GHSQ help sources showed greater improvement in mean difference in change for the main MATES message of seeking help from MATES Connectors.ConclusionThe intervention, as implemented, was not effective at achieving the primary or secondary outcomes.Trial RegistrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN 12622000122752.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 343
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a workplace suicide prevention program in the Australian manufacturing industry: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of MATES in manufacturing
    A. D. LaMontagne
    L. L. Cox
    C. Lockwood
    A. Mackinnon
    N. Hall
    R. Brimelow
    L. K.-D. Le
    C. Mihalopoulos
    T. King
    BMC Psychiatry, 22
  • [2] Evaluation of a workplace suicide prevention program in the Australian manufacturing industry: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of MATES in manufacturing
    LaMontagne, A. D.
    Cox, L. L.
    Lockwood, C.
    Mackinnon, A.
    Hall, N.
    Brimelow, R.
    Le, L. K. -D.
    Mihalopoulos, C.
    King, T.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [3] Correction: Evaluation of a workplace suicide prevention program in the Australian manufacturing industry: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of MATES in manufacturing
    A. D. LaMontagne
    L. L. Cox
    C. Lockwood
    A. Mackinnon
    N. Hall
    R. Brimelow
    L. K.-D. Le
    C. Mihalopoulos
    T. King
    BMC Psychiatry, 23
  • [4] Evaluation of a workplace suicide prevention program in the Australian manufacturing industry: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of MATES in manufacturing (vol 22, 799, 2022)
    LaMontagne, A. D.
    Cox, L. L.
    Lockwood, C.
    Mackinnon, A.
    Hall, N.
    Brimelow, R.
    Le, L. K. D.
    Mihalopoulos, C.
    King, T.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [5] Effectiveness of the Australian MATES in Construction Suicide Prevention Program: a systematic review
    Gullestrup, Jorgen
    King, Tania
    Thomas, Samantha L.
    LaMontagne, Anthony D.
    HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 38 (04)
  • [6] Virtual Versus In-Person Suicide Prevention Training in the Workplace: Evaluation of the VitalCog Program
    Mishkind M.C.
    Yannacone A.
    Lopez A.
    Jortberg B.T.
    Sherrill A.
    Mescher T.
    Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2023, 8 (4) : 352 - 359
  • [7] Suicide prevention in the workplace
    Macias-Toronjo, Israel
    Garcia-Iglesias, Juan Jesus
    Gomez-Salgado, Juan
    ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2025, 57 (02):
  • [8] Primary Care Cluster RCT to Increase Diabetes Prevention Program Referrals
    Keck, James W.
    Roper, Karen L.
    Hieronymus, Laura B.
    Thomas, Alisha R.
    Huang, Zhengyuan
    Westgate, Philip M.
    Fowlkes, John L.
    Cardarelli, Roberto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (01) : 79 - 87
  • [9] Effect of a workplace intervention on workplace social capital: a cluster RCT
    Framke, E.
    Sorensen, O. H.
    Pedersen, J.
    Clausen, T.
    Borg, V.
    Rugulies, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 133 - 133
  • [10] Evaluation of a Suicide Prevention Program for the Energy Sector
    Ross, Victoria
    Caton, Neil
    Mathieu, Sharna
    Gullestrup, Jorgen
    Kolves, Kairi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (17) : 1 - 11