Safety Integrity Level (SIL) evaluation of safety instrumented systems considering competing failure modes and subsystem priorities

被引:0
|
作者
Cheraghi, Morteza [1 ]
Taghipour, Sharareh [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Dept Mech Ind & Mechatron Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Safety Integrity Level (SIL); Safety Instrumented System (SIS); Safety Instrumented Function (SIF); Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD); Probability of Failing Safely (PFS); Competing failure modes; Subsystem priorities; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY; SUBJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2025.111025
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Safety Integrity Level (SIL) is a crucial measure of the safety performance of Safety Instrumented Systems (SISs), reflecting their ability to reduce risk. However, SIL analysis has often overlooked the impact of competing failure modes and subsystem priorities within SISs. This paper introduces a novel probabilistic model for evaluating the SIL of safety functions that incorporates these critical aspects. The model calculates the time-dependent Probability of (dangerous) Failure on Demand (PFD) and Probability of Failing Safely (PFS) at the component, subsystem, and system levels. The average PFD (PFDavg) and SIL are calculated considering both planned and unplanned proof tests. The proposed model is validated through Monte Carlo simulations and applied to a safety system designed to protect a process vessel from high-pressure hazards. A comparative analysis with existing models demonstrates that competing failure modes and subsystem priorities significantly influence PFD, PFS, PFDavg, and consequently SIL, especially in systems with longer proof test intervals and higher Safe Failure Fractions (SFFs).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety instrumented functions and safety integrity levels (SIL)
    Stavrianidis, P
    Bhimavarapu, K
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 1998, 37 (04) : 337 - 351
  • [2] Safety instrumented functions and safety integrity levels (SIL)
    Factory Mutual Research Corp, Norwood, MA, United States
    ISA Trans, 4 (337-351):
  • [3] Method for assigning safety integrity level (SIL) during design of safety instrumented systems (SIS) from database
    Wang, Feng
    Yang, Ou
    Zhang, Ruibo
    Shi, Lei
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 44 : 212 - 222
  • [4] A Unified Model for Evaluating the Safety Integrity Level of Safety Instrumented Systems
    Bukowski, Julia V.
    ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2008 PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 139 - 144
  • [5] Safety and operational integrity evaluation and design optimization of safety instrumented systems
    Innal, Fares
    Dutuit, Yves
    Chebila, Mourad
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 134 : 32 - 50
  • [6] Determining and verifying the safety integrity level of the safety instrumented systems with the uncertainty and security aspects
    Piesik, E.
    Sliwinski, M.
    Barnert, T.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 152 : 259 - 272
  • [7] Spurious activation and operational integrity evaluation of redundant safety instrumented systems
    Meng Qi
    Kan Yufeng
    Li Xun
    Wang Xiaoying
    Zhao Dongfeng
    Il, Moon
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 197
  • [8] Is the safety index of modern safety integrity level(SIL) truly appropriate for the railway?
    Cao, Yuan
    An, Yuntong
    Su, Shuai
    Sun, Yongkui
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2023, 192
  • [9] Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Integrated with Human and Organizational Factors
    Melo, Ana Paula A. V.
    Melo, Paulo Fernando F. F. e
    Nele, Marcio
    LP2013 - 14TH SYMPOSIUM ON LOSS PREVENTION AND SAFETY PROMOTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, VOLS I AND II, 2013, 31 : 343 - 348
  • [10] Systematic errors that compromise integrity of safety instrumented systems
    Chastain-Knight, Denise
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2023, 42 (04) : 612 - 621