The minimum land areas required for maximizing biodiversity conservation

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xinzhe [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yuqing [3 ]
Niu, Jin [4 ]
Wu, Ning [1 ]
Lu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Chengdu Inst Biol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Tibetan Plateau Res, State Key Lab Tibetan Plateau Earth Syst Environm, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[4] Brown Univ, Dept Econ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biodiversity crisis; Climate change; Human activities; Habitat quality; Conservation planning; Minimum critical areas; HUMAN FOOTPRINT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PROTECTED AREAS; PRIORITY AREAS; CONNECTIVITY; NETWORK; PERFORMANCE; EXTINCTION; SAFEGUARD; HOTSPOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110943
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework has established an ambitious target to expand protected areas and reverse the tide of biodiversity loss. However, such expansion entails significant financial and temporal costs. Consequently, identifying the most critical areas for biodiversity conservation has become a vital task for nations. This study developed a Biodiversity Conservation Priority Index (BCPI) through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis framework, to determine the minimum land area necessary for maximizing biodiversity conservation efforts. Taking the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) in China as a case study, we compiled distribution data for 2151 species, including 204 endangered species along with 14 climate and human activity factors, and three habitat indices to develop over 50 conservation scenarios. These scenarios aim to identify the minimum critical areas for biodiversity conservation (MCABC). The results show that the MCABC covers only 17.6 % of the QTP but shelters habitats for 96.1 % of endangered species and 97.2 % of all species. However, more than two-thirds of the MCABC are not covered by protected areas (PAs) or wilderness areas (WAs). Moreover, PAs are found to be less effective in protecting the MCABC compared to WAs. Lastly, under multiple SSP scenarios by 2100, the MCABC is expected to face primary threats from climate change, affecting 47.7 % to 84.6 % of the area, with more severe impacts anticipated in the southern and central QTP. This research addresses the challenge of optimizing biodiversity conservation at the minimum land cost and robustly supports the development of actions and strategies for achieving biodiversity goals.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biodiversity and sustainable Land Usage in Large Conservation Areas
    Job, Hubert
    RAUMFORSCHUNG UND RAUMORDNUNG, 2016, 74 (06) : 479 - 480
  • [2] The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity
    Allan, James R.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Atkinson, Scott C.
    Waldron, Anthony
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Adams, Vanessa M.
    Kissling, W. Daniel
    Worsdell, Thomas
    Sandbrook, Chris
    Gibbon, Gwili
    Kumar, Kundan
    Mehta, Piyush
    Maron, Martine
    Williams, Brooke A.
    Jones, Kendall R.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Reside, April E.
    Watson, James E. M.
    SCIENCE, 2022, 376 (6597) : 1094 - +
  • [3] Effectiveness of private land conservation areas in maintaining natural land cover and biodiversity intactness
    Shumba, Tafadzwa
    De Vos, Alta
    Biggs, Reinette
    Esler, Karen J.
    Ament, Judith M.
    Clements, Hayley S.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 22
  • [4] Land stewardship : an alternative to neoliberal governance for the conservation of biodiversity in natural areas ?
    Rivaud, Audrey
    Prevost, Benoit
    DEVELOPPEMENT DURABLE & TERRITOIRES, 2018, 9 (03):
  • [5] Reforms required to the Australian tax system to improve biodiversity conservation on private land
    Smith, Fiona
    Smillie, Kate
    Fitzsimons, James
    Lindsay, Bruce
    Wells, Gary
    Marles, Victoria
    Hutchinson, Jane
    O'Hara, Ben
    Perrigo, Tom
    Atkinson, Ian
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW JOURNAL, 2016, 33 (05): : 443 - 450
  • [6] Maximizing biodiversity conservation through behavior change strategies
    Maynard, Lily K
    Monroe, Martha C.
    Jacobson, Susan K.
    Savage, Anne
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (06)
  • [7] Protected Areas and Effective Biodiversity Conservation
    Le Saout, Soizic
    Hoffmann, Michael
    Shi, Yichuan
    Hughes, Adrian
    Bernard, Cyril
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Bertzky, Bastian
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Stuart, Simon N.
    Badman, Tim
    Rodrigues, Ana S. L.
    SCIENCE, 2013, 342 (6160) : 803 - 805
  • [8] Selecting relevant areas for biodiversity conservation
    Razola, I.
    Rey Benayas, J. M.
    de la Montana, E.
    Cayuela, L.
    ECOSISTEMAS, 2006, 15 (02): : 34 - 41
  • [9] Protected areas and biodiversity conservation in India
    Ghosh-Harihar, Mousumi
    An, Ruby
    Athrey, Ramana
    Borthakur, Udayan
    Chanchani, Pranav
    Chetry, Dilip
    Datta, Aparajita
    Harihar, Abishek
    Karanth, Krithi K.
    Mariyam, Dincy
    Mohan, Dhananjai
    Onial, Malvika
    Ramakrishnan, Uma
    Robin, V. V.
    Saxena, Ajai
    Shahabuddin, Ghazala
    Thatte, Prachi
    Vijay, Varsha
    Wacker, Kristen
    Mathur, Vinod B.
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    Price, Trevor D.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 237 : 114 - 124
  • [10] Conservation Biodiversity in Arid Areas: A Review
    Timis-Gansac, Voichita
    Dinca, Lucian
    Constandache, Cristinel
    Murariu, Gabriel
    Cheregi, Gabriel
    Timofte, Claudia Simona Cleopatra
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (06)