Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Large Multicenter Propensity Matched Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Manual Techniques

被引:3
|
作者
Rajesh, Diviya A. [1 ]
Witvoet, Sietske [2 ]
Coppolecchia, Andrea [3 ]
Scholl, Laura [3 ]
Chen, Antonia F. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Stryker, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Stryker Orthopaed, Div Joint Replacement, Mahwah, NJ USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; robotic; manual; length of stay; home healthcare; skilled nursing facility; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Robotic-arm assistance continues to gain popularity in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for its potential to improve component placement accuracy and patient outcomes. Nonetheless, there is limited data on the impact of robotic-assisted THA (RA-THA) on hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge location. This study thus aimed to compare LOS, discharge location, and readmission rate for propensity-matched cohorts of RA-THA versus manual THA (M-THA). Methods: A retrospective review of a multi-hospital database was performed to identify patients who underwent THA between January 2016 and December 2021 from surgeons who performed both RA-THA and M-THA at 77 geographically diverse hospitals. The RA-THA and M-THA cohorts were 1-to-1 matched based on patient sex, age, and body mass index, resulting in 8,536 patients per cohort. Insurance type, LOS, same-day discharge, discharge disposition, and 90-day all-cause readmission rate were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests. Results: Average LOS was significantly shorter for RA-THA patients (1.39 +/- 0.85 days) than for M-THA patients (1.48 +/- 0.91 days, P < .001). Compared to 5.6% of M-THA patients, 5.3% of RA-THA patients underwent same-day discharge (P = .38). There were statistically significant differences in discharge disposition between cohorts, with more RA-THA cases discharged home without home healthcare compared to M-THA (47.9 versus 45.5%, P = .001) and fewer RA-THA cases discharged to a skilled nursing facility compared to M-THA (5.6 versus 6.9%, P = .001). The 90-day all-cause readmission rate for RA-THA cases was 3.0%, compared to 3.4% for M-THA cases (P = .26). Conclusions: Compared to M-THA, RA-THA had a shorter average LOS, a similar percentage of patients with same-day discharge, fewer patients who had skilled nursing facility discharge, and a similar all-cause 90-day readmission rate. These results may be of interest to surgeons participating in bundled payment programs and engaging in cost savings. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S117 / S123
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lengths of Stay and Discharge Dispositions after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Manual Techniques
    Archer, Allison
    Salem, Hytham S.
    Coppolecchia, Andrea
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (04) : 404 - 410
  • [2] A Radiological Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Annapareddy, Adarsh
    Mulpur, Praharsha
    Jayakumar, Tarun
    Shinde, Chethan
    Prasad, Vemaganti Badri Narayana
    Reddy, A. V. Gurava
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 58 (10) : 1423 - 1430
  • [3] A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Nakamura, Nobuo
    Sugano, Nobuhiko
    Nishii, Takashi
    Kakimoto, Akihiro
    Miki, Hidenobu
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (04) : 1072 - 1081
  • [4] Minimum 5-Year Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Nested Comparison Against Manual Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
    Domb, Benjamin G.
    Chen, Jeffrey W.
    Lall, Ajay C.
    Perets, Itay
    Maldonado, David R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (20) : 847 - 856
  • [5] A Radiological Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty (vol 58, pg 1423, 2024)
    Annapareddy, Adarsh
    Mulpur, Praharsha
    Jayakumar, Tarun
    Shende, Chetan
    Prasad, Vemaganti Badri Narayana
    Reddy, A. V. Gurava
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 59 (01) : 131 - 131
  • [6] Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED COHORT STUDY
    Clement, N. D.
    Gaston, P.
    Bell, A.
    Simpson, P.
    Macpherson, G.
    Hamilton, D. F.
    Patton, J. T.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (01): : 22 - 30
  • [7] Postoperative Complications and Readmission Rates in Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: Large, Propensity Score-Matched Patient Cohorts
    Howell, Cole C.
    Witvoet, Sietske
    Scholl, Laura
    Coppolecchia, Andrea
    Bhowmik-Stoker, Manoshi
    Chen, Antonia F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2025, 33 (02) : 83 - 91
  • [8] Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty
    Park, Sang Eun
    Lee, Chun Taek
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (07): : 1054 - 1059
  • [9] Clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and manual total hip arthroplasty in the same patient: A case report
    Hu, Tian-Ye
    Lin, Dao-Chao
    Zhou, Yi-Jun
    Zhang, Zhi-Wu
    Yuan, Jia-Jun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2023, 11 (23) : 5519 - 5524
  • [10] A Comparison of Component Positioning Between Fluoroscopy-Assisted and Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Stewart, Nathaniel J.
    Stewart, James L.
    Brisbin, Abra
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (08): : 1602 - +