Feasibility of increasing physical activity levels of hospitalized cancer survivors using goal setting and feedback (CanFit): a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Dennett, Amy M. [1 ,2 ]
Harding, Katherine E. [1 ,2 ]
Peiris, Casey L. [1 ,3 ]
Goodwin, Victoria A. [4 ]
Hahne, Andrew [1 ]
Liedtke, Sabrina [5 ]
Wragg, Katrina [6 ]
Parente, Phillip [6 ,7 ]
Taylor, Nicholas F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Human Serv & Sport, Bundoora, Australia
[2] Eastern Hlth, Allied Hlth Clin Res Off, Box Hill, Australia
[3] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Allied Hlth, Parkville, Australia
[4] Univ Exeter, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Exeter, England
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Sports Sci, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Eastern Hlth, Dept Canc Serv, Box Hill, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Box Hill, Australia
关键词
Cancer; Physical activity; Behaviour change; Hospital; BED REST; EXERCISE; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; HEALTH; OLDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.physio.2025.101776
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives This trial aimed to provide estimates of effect and feasibility of a physical activity intervention for hospitalized cancer survivors using smartwatches for goal-setting and feedback. Design A feasibility, single-blinded, randomized trial. Setting Acute cancer unit in a tertiary hospital. Participants Adult hospitalized cancer survivors undergoing cancer treatment (n = 24). Interventions Participants were randomized to usual care or 2 sessions of a behavioural intervention using goal setting and feedback. Main outcome measures Blinded assessments occurred at admission (T0), discharge (T1) and 4-weeks post-discharge (T2). The primary outcome was accelerometer-measured daily step count and sedentary time. Secondary measures evaluated feasibility (demand, implementation, acceptability, practicality), mobility, self-efficacy, and health service outcomes. Results The trial was hampered by low recruitment rate (n = 24, 29% of target). There were moderate estimates of effect favouring the experimental group for mobility at T1 (mean difference [MD] 11 points, 95% CI -1 to 22). No other effects favored the experimental group. Estimates of step counts (T1 MD -284, 95% CI -1491 to +943; T2 -2249, 95% CI -6062 to +1565) and sedentary time (T1 MD +0.9 hours, 95% CI +0.1 to +2; T2 +2.8 hours, 95% CI -0.3 to +5.2) favored the usual care group. There was no difference in health service outcomes. The intervention was well accepted and no adverse events occurred. Conclusion A physical activity intervention for cancer survivors admitted to hospital was safe and acceptable but slow recruitment and uncertainty surrounding its efficacy hampered trial feasibility. Future trials should consider whole-of-ward interventions using novel trial designs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Increasing physical activity in cancer survivors at cardiovascular risk using Fitbits: Randomized controlled trial.
    Maxwell-Smith, Chloe Marie
    Cohen, Paul Andrew
    Platell, Cameron
    Tan, Patrick
    Tan, Jason
    Salama, Paul
    Levitt, Michael
    Makin, Gregory Bryan
    Salfinger, Stuart
    Mohan, Ganendra Raj Kader Ali
    Kane, Robert
    Hince, Dana
    Hardcastle, Sarah Jane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (07)
  • [2] INCREASING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY THROUGH SELF-MONITORING, GOAL SETTING, AND FEEDBACK
    Normand, Matthew P.
    BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 23 (04) : 227 - 236
  • [3] Dietary and Physical Activity Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    C. F. Lee
    Judy W. C. Ho
    Daniel Y. T. Fong
    Duncan J. Macfarlane
    Ester Cerin
    Antoinette M. Lee
    Sharron Leung
    Wynnie Y. Y. Chan
    Ivy P. F. Leung
    Sharon H. S. Lam
    Natural Chu
    Aliki J. Taylor
    Kar-keung Cheng
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [4] Dietary and Physical Activity Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lee, C. F.
    Ho, Judy W. C.
    Fong, Daniel Y. T.
    Macfarlane, Duncan J.
    Cerin, Ester
    Lee, Antoinette M.
    Leung, Sharron
    Chan, Wynnie Y. Y.
    Leung, Ivy P. F.
    Lam, Sharon H. S.
    Chu, Natural
    Taylor, Aliki J.
    Cheng, Kar-keung
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [5] Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Adding Behavioral Counseling to Supervised Physical Activity in Kidney Cancer Survivors A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Trinh, Linda
    Plotnikoff, Ronald C.
    Rhodes, Ryan E.
    North, Scott
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    CANCER NURSING, 2014, 37 (05) : E8 - E22
  • [6] Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of an Online Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Nova Scotian Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Forbes, Cynthia C.
    Blanchard, Chris M.
    Mummery, W. Kerry
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    JMIR CANCER, 2015, 1 (02):
  • [7] A pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial adding behavioral counseling to supervised physical activity in prostate cancer survivors: behavior change in prostate cancer survivors trial (BOOST)
    Trinh, Linda
    Kramer, Arthur F.
    Rowland, Kendrith
    Strom, Dominick A.
    Wong, Jaime N.
    McAuley, Edward
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 44 (02) : 172 - 186
  • [8] A pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial adding behavioral counseling to supervised physical activity in prostate cancer survivors: behavior change in prostate cancer survivors trial (BOOST)
    Linda Trinh
    Arthur F. Kramer
    Kendrith Rowland
    Dominick A. Strom
    Jaime N. Wong
    Edward McAuley
    Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2021, 44 : 172 - 186
  • [9] Using Performance Feedback and Goal Setting to Improve Elementary Students' Writing Fluency: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Koenig, Elizabeth A.
    Eckert, Tanya L.
    Hier, Bridget O.
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 45 (03) : 275 - 295
  • [10] INCREASING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND CHANGES IN COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING IN BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
    Hartman, Sheri J.
    Nelson, Sandahl H.
    Myers, Emily
    Natarajan, Loki
    Sears, Dorothy
    Palmer, Barton
    Parker, Barbara
    Patterson, Ruth
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S1850 - S1851