Evaluation of Effectiveness and Multi-Scenario Analysis of Land Use Development Strategies and Ecological Protection Redlines on Carbon Storage in the Great Bay Area of China Using the PLUS-InVEST-PSM Model

被引:0
|
作者
Jin, Yuhao [1 ]
Li, Yan [1 ]
Zhang, Han [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Xiaojuan [4 ]
Shi, Hong [5 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Civil Engn, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[2] East China Normal Univ, Chongqing Inst, Chongqing 401123, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Real Estate Sci Res Inst, Shanghai 200031, Peoples R China
[4] East China Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[5] Southwest Minzu Univ, Sch Tourism & Hist Culture, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
land use simulation; carbon storage; effectiveness assessment; ecological protection redline; PROPENSITY SCORE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.3390/land13111918
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land use change is a key factor affecting the carbon storage of terrestrial ecosystems. Most studies focus on formulating different land development strategies to mitigate the adverse impacts of land development, while fewer discuss the effectiveness of these strategies. In the context of varying socio-economic development and limited budgets for ecological conservation, evaluating effectiveness is essential for selecting the most suitable land development strategy. This research proposed a Patch-Generating Land Use Simulation-Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs-Propensity Score Matching (PLUS-InVEST-PSM) model to evaluate the effectiveness of different land use development strategies in the Greater Bay Area of China as a case study. Specifically, this study analyzed the historical land use changes from 2000 to 2020 and mapped the multi-scenario patterns of land use and carbon storage with the PLUS and the InVEST models from 2030 to 2050. Then, this study employed the PSM model, along with a series of criteria (i.e., similar ecological backgrounds and parallel historical trends), to evaluate the effectiveness of the ecological development strategy and ecological protection redlines on carbon storage compared with the natural development strategy. The results indicate that the ecological development strategy and the ecological protection redline can prevent the decline in carbon storage. However, in the ecological development strategy, implementing the ecological redline policy may hinder the growth of carbon storage within the ecological redline area. Compared with the PLUS-InVEST-PSM model, the comparison between the subregions could underestimate the efficiencies of evaluation, partly due to underestimating the negative impact of urban development on carbon storage. These findings will help governments develop comprehensive and systematic land use policies to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. Also, the approach would help to further explore the broader impacts of land use development strategies on the overall regional ecological environment, such as biodiversity and ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Assessing land use and carbon storage changes using PLUS and InVEST models: A multi-scenario simulation in Hohhot
    Zhang, Jiaping
    Cao, Penghui
    Roosli, Ruhizal
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2025, 26
  • [2] Multi-scenario carbon storage analysis based on PLUS model and InVEST model: a case study of Zhejiang province, China
    Wang, Yirong
    Jiang, Xueqin
    Gao, Song
    Jiang, Qi
    Du, Huaqiang
    Han, Ning
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2025, 18 (02)
  • [3] Spatial-temporal evolution analysis of multi-scenario land use and carbon storage based on PLUS-InVEST model: A case study in Dalian, China
    Wu, Qiang
    Wang, Li
    Wang, Tianyi
    Ruan, Ziyun
    Du, Peng
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166
  • [4] Multi-Scenario Simulation Analysis of Land Use and Carbon Storage Changes in Changchun City Based on FLUS and InVEST Model
    Li, Yingxue
    Liu, Zhaoshun
    Li, Shujie
    Li, Xiang
    LAND, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [5] Simulated Multi-Scenario Analysis of Land Use and Carbon Stock Dynamics in the Yiluo River Basin Using the PLUS-InVEST Model
    Zhao, Na
    Gao, Feilong
    Qin, Long
    Sang, Chenxi
    Yao, Zhijun
    Liu, Binglei
    Zhang, Minglei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [6] Multi-Scenario Land Use/Cover Change and Its Impact on Carbon Storage Based on the Coupled GMOP-PLUS-InVEST Model in the Hexi Corridor, China
    Zhang, Yang
    Naerkezi, Nazhalati
    Zhang, Yun
    Wang, Bo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [7] The Response of Carbon Stocks to Land Use/Cover Change and a Vulnerability Multi-Scenario Analysis of the Karst Region in Southern China Based on PLUS-InVEST
    Du, Shuanglong
    Zhou, Zhongfa
    Huang, Denghong
    Zhang, Fuxianmei
    Deng, Fangfang
    Yang, Yue
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (12):
  • [8] Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land-Use/Land-Cover Changes and Carbon Storage Prediction Coupled with the SD-PLUS-InVEST Model: A Case Study of the Tuojiang River Basin, China
    Wang, Qi
    Zhang, Wenying
    Xia, Jianguo
    Ou, Dinghua
    Tian, Zhaonan
    Gao, Xuesong
    LAND, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [9] Multi-scenario simulation of land use/land cover change and water yield evaluation coupled with the GMOP-PLUS-InVEST model: A case study of the Nansi Lake Basin in China
    Liu, Yingchun
    Jing, Yande
    Han, Shanmei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 155