Risk Estimation of Late Rectal Toxicity Using a Convolutional Neural Network-based Dose Prediction in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Takano, Seiya [1 ]
Tomita, Natsuo [1 ]
Takaoka, Taiki [1 ]
Ukai, Machiko [1 ]
Matsuura, Akane [1 ]
Oguri, Masanosuke [1 ]
Kita, Nozomi [1 ]
Torii, Akira [1 ]
Niwa, Masanari [1 ]
Okazaki, Dai [1 ]
Yasui, Takahiro [2 ]
Hiwatashi, Akio [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Radiol, 1 Kawasumi,Mizuho Cho,Mizuho Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Nagoya City Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Urol, 1 Kawasumi,Mizuho Cho,Mizuho Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
RADIOTHERAPY; SPACER; DECISION; BENEFIT; MODELS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2025.101739
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The present study investigated the feasibility of our automatic plan generation model based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) to estimate the baseline risk of grade >= 2 late rectal bleeding (G2-LRB) in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: We built the 2-dimensional U-net model to predict dose distributions using the planning computed tomography and organs at risk masks as inputs. Seventy-five volumetric modulated arc therapy plans of prostate cancer, which were delivered at 74.8 Gy in 34 fractions with a uniform planning goal, were included: 60 for training and 5-fold cross-validation, and the remaining 15 for testing. Isodose volume dice similarity coefficient, dose-volume histogram, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) metrics between planned and CNN-predicted dose distributions were calculated. The primary endpoint was the goodness-of-fit, expressed as a coefficient of determination (R-2) value, in predicting the percentage of G2-LRB-Lyman-Kutcher-Burman-NTCP. Results: In 15 test cases, 2-dimensional U-net predicted dose distributions with a mean isodose volume dice similarity coefficient value of 0.90 within the high-dose region (doses >= 50 Gy). Rectum V-50Gy, V-60Gy, and V-70Gy were accurately predicted (R-2 = 0.73, 0.82, and 0.87, respectively). Strong correlations were observed between planned and predicted G2-LRB-Lyman-Kutcher-Burman-NTCP (R-2 = 0.80, P < .001), with a small percent mean absolute error (mean +/- 1 standard deviation, 1.24% +/- 1.42%). Conclusions: A risk estimation of LRB using CNN-based automatic plan generation from anatomic information was feasible. These results will contribute to the development of a decision support system that identifies priority cases for preradiation therapy interventions, such as hydrogel spacer implantation.<br /> (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of Three Dimensional Dose Distribution Using a Convolutional Neural Network for Prostate Radiation Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Yuan, J.
    Kashani, R.
    Zaorsky, N.
    Spratt, D.
    Zheng, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E409 - E409
  • [2] Optimizing thermal dose prediction in nanoparticle-mediated photothermal therapy using a convolutional neural network-based model
    Shirisha, N.
    Sonker, Abhilash
    Ramesh, Janjhyam Venkata Naga
    Saidani, Taoufik
    Rajesh, Yelisela
    Vydehi, Kasichainula
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY, 2025, 128
  • [3] Time course of late rectal toxicity after radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    K Odrazka
    M Dolezel
    J Vanasek
    M Vaculikova
    M Zouhar
    J Sefrova
    P Paluska
    M Vosmik
    T Kohlova
    I Kolarova
    Z Macingova
    P Navratil
    M Brodak
    P Prosvic
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2010, 13 : 138 - 143
  • [4] Time course of late rectal toxicity after radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Odrazka, K.
    Dolezel, M.
    Vanasek, J.
    Vaculikova, M.
    Zouhar, M.
    Sefrova, J.
    Paluska, P.
    Vosmik, M.
    Kohlova, T.
    Kolarova, I.
    Macingova, Z.
    Navratil, P.
    Brodak, M.
    Prosvic, P.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2010, 13 (02) : 138 - 143
  • [5] Voxel-based Analysis of Dose for Toxicity Prediction in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Drean, G.
    Acosta, O.
    Arango, J. Ospina
    Simon, A.
    Cazoulat, G.
    Haigron, P.
    Gnep, K.
    Zhu, J.
    Henry, O.
    de Crevoisier, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S386 - S387
  • [6] Improving breast cancer risk prediction using a convolutional neural network-based mammographic evaluation in combination with clinical risk factors
    Michel, Alissa
    Ro, Vicky
    McGuinness, Julia E.
    Mutasa, Simukayi
    Ha, Richard
    Crew, Katherine D.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)
  • [7] Relationships Between Rectal Dose and Patient-Reported Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity After Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Olsson, C. E.
    Alsadius, D.
    Wilderang, U.
    Steineck, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S55 - S55
  • [8] Age and Comorbid Illness Are Associated With Late Rectal Toxicity Following Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    Stenmark, Matt H.
    Ritter, Tim
    Litzenberg, Dale
    Jackson, William
    Johnson, Skyler
    Albrecht-Unger, Liesel
    Donaghy, Alex
    Phelps, Laura
    Blas, Kevin
    Halverson, Schuyler
    Marsh, Robin
    Olson, Karin
    Feng, Felix Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (05): : 1246 - 1253
  • [9] Iterative Convolutional Neural Network-Based Illumination Estimation
    Koscevic, Karlo
    Subasic, Marko
    Loncaric, Sven
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 26755 - 26765
  • [10] Breast cancer risk prediction combining a convolutional neural network-based mammographic evaluation with clinical factors
    Michel, Alissa
    Ro, Vicky
    McGuinness, Julia E.
    Mutasa, Simukayi
    Terry, Mary Beth
    Tehranifar, Parisa
    May, Benjamin
    Ha, Richard
    Crew, Katherine D.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 200 (02) : 237 - 245