Changing large wildfire dynamics in the wildland-urban interface of the eastern United States

被引:0
|
作者
Weidig, Noah C. [1 ]
Wonkka, Carissa L. [1 ]
Ivey, Michaella A. [1 ]
Donovan, Victoria M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, West Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Sch Forest Fisheries & Geomat Sci, Milton, FL 32583 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
development; exposure; fire regime; housing growth; risk; sprawl; urbanisation; wildland fire; wildland-urban interface; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FIRE; FORESTS; FRAGMENTATION; IGNITION; RISK;
D O I
10.1071/WF24110
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Background The recent increase in large wildfires in the eastern United States makes it crucial to examine the subsequent risk to human life and property. In the eastern US, the wildland-urban interface (WUI), where wildfire risk is greatest, has expanded tremendously over the last three decades. Aims This study aimed to understand how increasing wildfires in the eastern US are manifesting in the WUI. Methods We quantified WUI growth and characterised large (>200 ha) wildfire regimes inside and outside the WUI at multiple spatial scales across the eastern US between 1986 and 2021. Key results WUI wildfires in the eastern US comprised 45% of all large wildfires and 55% of the area burned, were on average 46% larger than non-WUI wildfires, and are becoming more frequent in spring. Most increases in wildfire number and area burned occurred outside of the WUI. Conclusion The WUI plays an important role in large wildfire dynamics in the eastern US; however, increases in the number of large wildfires have occurred primarily outside the WUI. Implications Our findings highlight important interactions between human development and large wildfire occurrence in the eastern US and should be used to direct future region-specific assessments of changing wildfire risk.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The wildland-urban interface in the United States
    Radeloff, VC
    Hammer, RB
    Stewart, SI
    Fried, JS
    Holcomb, SS
    McKeefry, JF
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (03) : 799 - 805
  • [2] Interpreting federal policy at the local level: the wildland-urban interface concept in wildfire protection planning in the eastern United States
    Grayzeck-Souter, Stephanie A.
    Nelson, Kristen C.
    Brummel, Rachel F.
    Jakes, Pamela
    Williams, Daniel R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2009, 18 (03) : 278 - 289
  • [3] Wildfire risk for global wildland-urban interface areas
    Chen, Bin
    Wu, Shengbiao
    Jin, Yufang
    Song, Yimeng
    Wu, Chao
    Venevsky, Sergey
    Xu, Bing
    Webster, Chris
    Gong, Peng
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 7 (04) : 474 - 484
  • [4] Demographic Trends, the Wildland-Urban Interface, and Wildfire Management
    Hammer, Roger B.
    Stewart, Susan I.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2009, 22 (08) : 777 - 782
  • [5] Forest plant invasions in the eastern United States: evidence of invasion debt in the wildland-urban interface
    Potter, Kevin M.
    Riitters, Kurt H.
    Iannone, Basil V.
    Guo, Qinfeng
    Fei, Songlin
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2024, 39 (12)
  • [6] Reclassifying the Wildland-Urban Interface Using Fire Occurrences for the United States
    Hanberry, Brice B.
    LAND, 2020, 9 (07)
  • [7] Wildfire risk, salience, and housing development in the wildland-urban interface
    Black, Katie Jo
    Irwin, Nicholas B.
    McCoy, Shawn J.
    JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 63 (04) : 922 - 946
  • [8] Planning for Wildfire in the Wildland-Urban Interface: A Guide for Western Communities
    Miller, Stephen R.
    URBAN LAWYER, 2017, 49 (02): : 207 - 266
  • [9] The wildland-urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations
    Carlson, Amanda R.
    Helmers, David P.
    Hawbaker, Todd J.
    Mockrin, Miranda H.
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2022, 32 (05)
  • [10] POPULATION GROWTH, WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE, AND WILDFIRE IN THE GREAFER AUSTIN, TEXAS
    Gong, Gang
    Hallonquist, Joe
    PAPERS OF THE APPLIED GEOGRAPHY CONFERENCES, VOL 33, 2010, : 298 - 306