Automatic cross-validation in structured models: Is it time to leave out leave-one-out?

被引:7
|
作者
Adin, Aritz [1 ,2 ]
Krainski, Elias Teixeira [1 ,3 ]
Lenzi, Amanda [1 ,4 ]
Liu, Zhedong [1 ,5 ]
Martinez-Minaya, Joaquin [1 ,6 ]
Rue, Havard [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Publ Navarra, Campus Arrosadia, Pamplona 31006, Spain
[2] Univ Publ Navarra, Inst Adv Mat & Math InaMat2, Dept Stat Comp Sci & Math, Pamplona, Spain
[3] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST, Stat Program, Comp Elect & Math Sci & Engn Div, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Math, Edinburgh, Scotland
[5] RIKEN Ctr AI Project, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Appl Stat Operat Res & Qual, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Cross-validation; Hierarchical models; INLA; Spatial statistics; COMPOSITIONAL DATA-ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION; JOINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100843
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Standard techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) might not be suitable for evaluating the predictive performance of models incorporating structured random effects. In such cases, the correlation between the training and test sets could have a notable impact on the model's prediction error. To overcome this issue, an automatic group construction procedure for leave-group-out cross validation (LGOCV) has recently emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing predictive performance measurement in structured models. The purpose of this paper is (i) to compare LOOCV and LGOCV within structured models, emphasizing model selection and predictive performance, and (ii) to provide real data applications in spatial statistics using complex structured models fitted with INLA, showcasing the utility of the automatic LGOCV method. First, we briefly review the key aspects of the recently proposed LGOCV method for automatic group construction in latent Gaussian models. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of this method for selecting the model with the highest predictive performance by simulating extrapolation tasks in both temporal and spatial data analyses. Finally, we provide insights into the effectiveness of the LGOCV method in modeling complex structured data, encompassing spatio-temporal multivariate count data, spatial compositional data, and spatio-temporal geospatial data.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-validation and predictive metrics in psychological research: Do not leave out the leave-one-out
    Iglesias, Diego
    Sorrel, Miguel A.
    Olmos, Ricardo
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2025, 57 (03)
  • [2] Leave-one-out cross-validation is risk consistent for lasso
    Darren Homrighausen
    Daniel J. McDonald
    Machine Learning, 2014, 97 : 65 - 78
  • [3] Bayesian Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation for Large Data
    Magnusson, Mans
    Andersen, Michael Riis
    Jonasson, Johan
    Vehtari, Aki
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 97, 2019, 97
  • [4] Leave-one-out cross-validation is risk consistent for lasso
    Homrighausen, Darren
    McDonald, Daniel J.
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2014, 97 (1-2) : 65 - 78
  • [5] Weighted Leave-One-Out Cross Validation
    Pronzato, Luc
    Rendas, Maria-Joao
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2024, 12 (04): : 1213 - 1239
  • [6] Rejoinder: More Limitations of Bayesian Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation
    Gronau Q.F.
    Wagenmakers E.-J.
    Computational Brain & Behavior, 2019, 2 (1) : 35 - 47
  • [7] Limitations of Bayesian Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation for Model Selection
    Gronau Q.F.
    Wagenmakers E.-J.
    Computational Brain & Behavior, 2019, 2 (1) : 1 - 11
  • [8] Robust Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation for High-Dimensional Bayesian Models
    Silva, Luca Alessandro
    Zanella, Giacomo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 119 (547) : 2369 - 2381
  • [9] Efficient approximate leave-one-out cross-validation for kernel logistic regression
    Cawley, Gavin C.
    Talbot, Nicola L. C.
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2008, 71 (2-3) : 243 - 264
  • [10] Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation for Bayesian Model Comparison in Large Data
    Magnusson, Mans
    Andersen, Michael Riis
    Jonasson, Johan
    Vehtari, Aki
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 108, 2020, 108 : 341 - 350