Renewable energy development and carbon productivity in OECD countries: A new perspective on the internal mix of renewable energy

被引:0
|
作者
Xie, Liang [1 ]
Mu, Xianzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Inst Recycling Econ, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Renewable energy development; carbon productivity; renewable energy mix diversification; renewable energy mix differentiation; renewable energy technology innovation; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CONSUMPTION; HYDRO;
D O I
10.1080/15435075.2025.2462620
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Achieving environmental sustainability and economic growth demands higher carbon productivity. While much literature discusses the impact of renewable energy scale and penetration on carbon productivity, the specific effects of the internal structure of renewable energy sources are not well understood. This study explores the influence of the renewable energy internal structure on carbon productivity in 35 selected OECD countries. The main results are as follows: (1) The gradual diversification of the renewable energy mix has a U-shaped relationship with carbon productivity. Almost half of the countries have passed the turning point. This "U-shape" relation exists across all quantiles with little variation in inflection points. (2) The diversification of the renewable energy mix impacts carbon productivity through non-linear scale and structural effects, as well as linear technology effects. (3) The growing differentiation in the renewable energy mix among countries has a negative impact on carbon productivity, and this adverse effect is more significant in countries with higher carbon productivity levels. These findings provide valuable insights for OECD countries to optimize the internal mix of renewable energy for promoting carbon productivity. They emphasize the importance of considering the internal structure of renewable energy sources in formulating renewable energy development policies. Specifically, due to the non-linear relationship between renewable energy structural diversification and carbon productivity, countries at different levels of diversification can adopt distinct renewable energy development strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Renewable energy and total factor productivity in OECD member countries
    Sohag, Kazi
    Chukavina, Kristina
    Samargandi, Nahla
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 296
  • [2] Renewable energy and total factor productivity in OECD member countries
    Sohag, Kazi
    Chukavina, Kristina
    Samargandi, Nahla
    Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 296
  • [3] Dual Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of Renewable Energy Alternatives of OECD Countries
    Kara, Sedef E.
    Ibrahim, Mustapha D.
    Daneshvar, Sahand
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [4] Green finance, renewable energy and carbon neutrality in OECD countries
    Jin, Cheng
    Lv, Zhiwei
    Li, Zengrong
    Sun, Kehan
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 211 : 279 - 284
  • [5] Energy innovation investment and renewable energy in OECD countries
    Opoku, Eric Evans Osei
    Acheampong, Alex O.
    Dogah, Kingsley E.
    Koomson, Isaac
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2024, 54
  • [6] Renewable energy and sustainable development: Evidence from OECD countries
    Guney, Taner
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2021, 40 (04)
  • [7] Renewable energy and sustainable development: Evidence from OECD countries
    Güney, Taner
    Güney, Taner (tanerguney@kmu.edu.tr), 1600, John Wiley and Sons Inc (40):
  • [8] Evolution of energy mix in emerging countries: Modern renewable energy, traditional renewable energy, and non-renewable energy
    Shrestha, Anil
    Mustafa, Andy Ali
    Htike, Myo Myo
    You, Vithyea
    Kakinaka, Makoto
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 199 : 419 - 432
  • [9] Energy market liberalization and renewable energy policies in OECD countries
    Nicolli, Francesco
    Vona, Francesco
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 : 853 - 867
  • [10] The evolutionary renewable energy and mitigation impact in OECD countries
    Jin, Taeyoung
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 189 : 570 - 586