Optimizing e-Learning in CPD: Preferences and Perceptions of Health Professionals

被引:0
|
作者
Samuel, Anita [1 ]
Cervero, Ronald M. [1 ]
King, Beth [1 ]
Durning, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Profess Educ, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
e-learning; continuing professional development; online instructional strategies; DESIGN; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1097/CEH.0000000000000570
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction:Continuing professional development for health professionals increasingly relies on e-learning. However, there is insufficient research into the instructional strategies health professionals prefer to engage with in e-learning. An empirical study was undertaken to answer the research question: What instructional strategies do learners prefer in e-learning modules to improve their learning experience?Methods:The Department of Health Professions Education at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences developed six, stand-alone, self-paced modules for health professionals focusing on education and leadership. The module evaluation survey consisted of six Likert scale questions and two open-ended questions. Responses from these anonymized module evaluations from 2019 to 2022 were analyzed. Descriptive statistics for the Likert scale questions were calculated. Responses to the two open-ended questions were compiled and analyzed thematically.Results:All survey respondents found the content of the modules helpful and met their stated learning objectives. A majority (94%) agreed or strongly agreed that readings and videos increased their knowledge in the topic area and that quizzes effectively strengthened their understanding of the topics. Four themes emerged from the qualitative data: pedagogical strategies, technology issues, feedback and interaction, and transfer of learning.Conclusions:This study foregrounds the voice of the learner, which emphasizes health professionals' preference for instructional strategies that align with their needs as adult learners. The findings highlight the value of content relevance, expert creation, and authentic examples in enhancing learner satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 34
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] E-learning for health professionals
    Vaona, Alberto
    Banzi, Rita
    Kwag, Koren H.
    Rigon, Giulio
    Cereda, Danilo
    Pecoraro, Valentina
    Tramacere, Irene
    Moja, Lorenzo
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (01):
  • [2] Continuing medical education and E-learning for health professionals
    Mumcu, Gonca
    Koksal, Leyla
    Sisman, Nur
    Catar, Ozgur
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2011, 1 (01): : 74 - 78
  • [3] E-Learning for healthcare professionals
    Mantas, John
    Liaskos, Joseph
    Frigas, Antonis
    INTEGRATING BIOMEDICAL INFORMATION: FROM E-CELL TO E-PATIENT, 2006, : 56 - +
  • [4] Individual preferences in e-learning
    Hartley, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 35 (03) : 383 - 384
  • [5] Individual preferences in e-learning
    Hartley, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 36 (04) : 695 - 696
  • [6] Individual preferences in e-learning
    du Preez, M
    ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2004, 22 (04): : 363 - 364
  • [7] Innovative Vector and Pest E-Learning for Environmental Health Professionals
    Kalis, Martin A.
    Oeffinger, John
    Baddour, Liljana Johnson
    Tate, Christl
    Oeffinger, Kathy
    White, Luann
    Kleiman, Diana
    Shorter, Charles
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 79 (05) : 30 - 32
  • [8] Addressing the issue of e-learning and online genetics for health professionals
    Gresty, Karen
    Skirton, Heather
    Evenden, Andrew
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2007, 9 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [9] Developing an e-learning course on the use of PRO measures in oncological practice: health care professionals’ preferences for learning content and methods
    Monika Sztankay
    Lisa M. Wintner
    Sigrid Roggendorf
    Thomas Nordhausen
    Linda Dirven
    Martin J. B. Taphoorn
    Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
    Galina Velikova
    Andrew Bottomley
    Dagmara Kulis
    Timo Kachel
    Heike Schmidt
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 2555 - 2567
  • [10] Developing an e-learning course on the use of PRO measures in oncological practice: health care professionals' preferences for learning content and methods
    Sztankay, Monika
    Wintner, Lisa M.
    Roggendorf, Sigrid
    Nordhausen, Thomas
    Dirven, Linda
    Taphoorn, Martin J. B.
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
    Velikova, Galina
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Kulis, Dagmara
    Kachel, Timo
    Schmidt, Heike
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (03) : 2555 - 2567