共 50 条
Evaluation of wastage of commonly used anaesthetic agents in the operating theatres of a South African teaching hospital
被引:0
|作者:
Majara, P.
[1
]
Leballo, G.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Clin Med, Dept Anaesthesiol, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源:
关键词:
anaesthetic drugs;
routine drug wastage;
preventable drug wastage;
drug cost;
general anaesthesia;
regional anaesthesia;
sedation technique;
DRUG WASTAGE;
CARE;
COST;
D O I:
10.7196/SAMJ.2025.v115i2.2339
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background. Anaesthetic drug wastage negatively impacts the already constrained economy in developing countries such as South Africa (SA). However, safe anaesthetic drug administration during both elective and emergency surgeries can be achieved without increasing wastage or costs. Drugs frequently wasted include those required in emergencies. Cost-reduction strategies, particularly in drug wastage, represent a potential area for short-term savings in hospital drug budgets. Increasing clinician awareness of drug wastage can help modify practices, leading to reduced waste while maintaining high-quality patient care. Objective. To evaluate wastage of commonly administered anaesthetic drugs, and to evaluate preventable and routine drug wastage and its cost. Methods. A prospective observational study was conducted in the operating theatre of Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, a tertiary hospital in SA. Prospective data were collected for all patients who presented for elective and emergency surgical procedures at this institution over a 2-week period. Drug preparation and administration were determined by the treating anaesthesiologist. The amount of remaining drug in syringes and opened ampoules was considered as wasted. Routine drug wastage was defined as the remaining drug after the required dose was administered, while preventable drug wastage referred to drugs drawn but not administered to the patient. Results. Data were collected from 373 participants, of whom 58% were undergoing elective surgery. The average drug wastage was 29.7%, comprising 21.3% routine wastage and 8.4% preventable wastage, with an effect size of 0.47 (p<0.001). Propofol accounted for the highest frequency of routine drug wastage, while preventable wastage was predominantly attributed to adrenaline, atropine and suxamethonium (emergency pharmacological agents). The average cost of routine wastage was ZAR3.85, significantly higher than the ZAR1.32 for preventable drug wastage (p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed a significant association between paediatric surgical cases and increased anaesthetic drug wastage (p=0.004). Conclusion. The cost and wastage of anaesthetic drugs pose significant challenges in healthcare institutions, particularly in developing countries with limited resources. Implementing cost-effective strategies, such as using smaller ampoules and prefilled syringes, has been demonstrated to reduce drug wastage without compromising patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文