Tree diversity and community characteristics of a tropical moist deciduous forest of Assam, India

被引:0
|
作者
Priyanka Kalita [1 ]
J. Y. Yumnam [1 ]
机构
[1] Cotton University,Department of Botany
来源
Vegetos | 2025年 / 38卷 / 2期
关键词
Distribution pattern; IVI; Regeneration status; Species evenness; Species richness;
D O I
10.1007/s42535-023-00799-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The plant species composition, diversity and regeneration are critical in affecting forest health and are important for the conservation of forest ecosystems in any area. The present study was done in Gotanagar Reserve Forest (GRF) of Kamrup Metropolitan district of Assam, India in the year 2020–2022 by laying 25 quadrats of 100 m2, 50 quadrats of 25 m2 and 75 quadrats of 1 m2 for trees, saplings and seedlings, respectively. A total of 39 species belonging to 34 genera and 20 families were recorded in the study. Total tree density was 1008 stem ha−1, with maximum tree density contributed by Gmelina arborea (80 stem ha−1). Total basal cover (TBC) of trees was found to be 71.74 m2 ha−1, with maximum basal cover occupied by Schima wallichii (7.88 m2 ha−1). Gmelina arborea (IVI = 20.65) showed the highest dominance followed by Shorea robusta (IVI = 18.16). Shannon–Wiener diversity index, Simpson’s index, Margalef’s species richness and Pielou’s species evenness index for trees were recorded to be 3.50, 0.03, 6.87 and 0.96 respectively. The majority of the tree species (92.31%) showed a contagious distribution pattern, and only 7.69% showed random distribution. The majority (71.79%) of tree species showed good regeneration status, 15.38% showed fair regeneration status, 7.69% showed poor regeneration status and 5.13% showed no regeneration at all. The findings revealed that GRF is rich in tree species composition with good species richness and diversity. However, effective conservation and management initiatives are needed for the species under not regenerating category to conserve the vegetation and health of the forest.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 667
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Structure, composition and diversity of tree species in tropical moist deciduous forests of Eastern India: a case study of Nayagarh Forest Division, Odisha
    Tirthabrata Sahoo
    Pratap Chandra Panda
    Laxmikanta Acharya
    Journal of Forestry Research, 2017, 28 : 1219 - 1230
  • [3] Structure, composition and diversity of tree species in tropical moist deciduous forests of Eastern India: a case study of Nayagarh Forest Division, Odisha
    Tirthabrata Sahoo
    Pratap Chandra Panda
    Laxmikanta Acharya
    JournalofForestryResearch, 2017, 28 (06) : 1219 - 1230
  • [4] Structure, composition and diversity of tree species in tropical moist deciduous forests of Eastern India: a case study of Nayagarh Forest Division, Odisha
    Sahoo, Tirthabrata
    Panda, Pratap Chandra
    Acharya, Laxmikanta
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (06) : 1219 - 1230
  • [6] Diversity of leaf phenology in a tropical deciduous forest in India
    Kushwaha, CP
    Singh, KP
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 21 : 47 - 56
  • [7] Plant species diversity in unmanaged moist deciduous forest of Northern India
    Gautam, M.K. (mukeshcric@gmail.com), 1600, Indian Academy of Sciences (106):
  • [8] Plant species diversity in unmanaged moist deciduous forest of Northern India
    Gautam, Mukesh K.
    Manhas, Rajesh K.
    Tripathi, Ashutosh K.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2014, 106 (02): : 277 - 287
  • [9] Tree Community Assemblage and Abiotic Variables in Tropical Moist Deciduous Forest of Himalayan Terai Eco-Region
    Bajpai O.
    Dutta V.
    Singh R.
    Chaudhary L.B.
    Pandey J.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2020, 90 (4) : 873 - 883
  • [10] The study of microclimate in response to different plant community association in tropical moist deciduous forest from northern India
    Behera, Soumit K.
    Mishra, Ashish K.
    Sahu, Nayan
    Kumar, Amrit
    Singh, Niraj
    Kumar, Anoop
    Bajpai, Omesh
    Chaudhary, L. B.
    Khare, Prem B.
    Tuli, Rakesh
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2012, 21 (05) : 1159 - 1176