Ultraviolet-C-based sanitization is a cost-effective option for hospitals to manage health care-associated infection risks from high touch mobile phones

被引:0
|
作者
Cook, David C. [1 ,2 ]
Olsen, Matthew [3 ]
Tronstad, Oystein [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Fraser, John F. [3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Goldsworthy, Adrian [1 ,3 ]
Alghafri, Rashed [1 ,10 ]
Mckirdy, Simon J.
Tajouri, Lotti [1 ,3 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Harry Butler Res Inst, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Agr & Environm, Crawley, WA, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Robina, Qld, Australia
[4] Prince Charles Hosp, Crit Care Res Grp, Chermside, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Herston, Qld, Australia
[6] Prince Charles Hosp, Physiotherapy Dept, Chermside, Qld, Australia
[7] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Univ Queensland, Northside Sch Med, Chermside, Qld, Australia
[9] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Herston, Qld, Australia
[10] Dubai Police, Int Ctr Forens Sci, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[11] Dubai Police, Dubai Police Scientists Council, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
来源
FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES | 2025年 / 4卷
关键词
mobile phone sanitizer; ultraviolet-C; hand hygiene; public health; fomite; antimicrobial; cost effectiveness analysis; hospital-acquired infections; HAND HYGIENE; BACTERIAL-CONTAMINATION; CELL PHONE; UV-C; WORKERS; DISINFECTION; SURVEILLANCE; ALCOHOL; DEVICES;
D O I
10.3389/frhs.2024.1448913
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Mobile phones have become essential tools for health care workers around the world, but as high touch surfaces, they can harbor microorganisms that pose infection risks to patients and staff. As their use in hospitals increases, hospital managers must introduce measures to sanitize mobile phones and reduce risks of health care-associated infections. But such measures can involve substantial costs. Our objective in this paper was to consider two mobile phone risk mitigation strategies that managers of a hypothetical hospital could implement and determine which involves the lowest cost. The first strategy required all staff to sanitize their hands after every contact with a mobile phone. The second involved the hospital investing in ultraviolet-C-based mobile phone sanitization devices that allowed staff to decontaminate their mobile phones after every use. We assessed each intervention on material and opportunity costs assuming both achieved an equivalent reduction in microbe transmission within the hospital. We found that ultraviolet-C devices were the most cost-effective intervention, with median costs of approximately AUD360 per bed per year compared to AUD965 using hand hygiene protocols. Our results imply that a 200-bed hospital could potentially save AUD1-1.4 million over 10 years by investing in germicidal ultraviolet-C phone sanitizers rather than relying solely on hand hygiene protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据