共 50 条
Postoperative delirium under general anaesthesia by remimazolam versus propofol: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
被引:2
|作者:
Suga, Masafumi
[1
,2
]
Yasuhara, Jun
[3
]
Watanabe, Atsuyuki
[4
]
Takagi, Hisato
[5
]
Kuno, Toshiki
[6
,7
]
Nishimura, Takeshi
[2
]
Ijuin, Shinichi
[2
]
Taira, Takuya
[2
]
Inoue, Akihiko
[2
]
Ishihara, Satoshi
[2
]
Pakavakis, Adrian
[1
]
Glassford, Neil
[1
]
Shehabi, Yahya
[8
]
机构:
[1] Monash Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care, Melbourne, Vic 3168, Australia
[2] Hyogo Emergency Med Ctr, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Monash Heart & Monash Childrens Hosp, Monash Hlth, Dept Pediat Cardiol, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Mt Sinai Beth Israel, Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[5] Shizuoka Med Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Shizuoka, Japan
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiol Div, Boston, MA USA
[7] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Bronx, NY USA
[8] Monash Univ, Monash Hlth, Sch Clin Sci, Melbourne, Australia
关键词:
General anaesthesia;
Intraoperative hypotension;
Postoperative delirium (POD);
Postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction (POCD);
Propofol;
Remimazolam;
SEDATION REDUCES DELIRIUM;
CARDIAC-SURGERY;
ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY;
ADULT PATIENTS;
OLDER PATIENTS;
DEXMEDETOMIDINE;
MIDAZOLAM;
RISK;
PHARMACOKINETICS;
EFFICACY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111735
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
Background Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has similar clinical effects to propofol for sedation in general anaesthesia. However, it remains uncertain whether remimazolam could increase postoperative delirium (POD) compared with propofol. Objectives The purpose of our study was to compare the incidence of POD between remimazolam and propofol as sedative agents in general anaesthesia. Study design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for prospective RCTs published through September 16, 2024. RCTs reporting the incidence of POD and comparing remimazolam with propofol for general anaesthesia were included. Odds ratio (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the incidence of POD. The secondary outcomes included time to extubation, awakening time, and adverse events such as intraoperative hypotension. Results A total of six RCTs involving 1107 patients were included in this meta-analysis. For the primary outcome, the incidence of POD did not differ between the remimazolam and propofol groups (OR, 0.92; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.44). Regarding the secondary outcomes, remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension compared with propofol (OR, 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.21-0.46). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. In the sensitivity analysis on three RCTs including only older patients (>= 60 years old), there was no significant difference in the incidence of POD (OR, 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.52-1.93). Conclusion Perioperative remimazolam administration did not increase POD and reduced the risk of intraoperative hypotension compared to propofol. Further large-scale RCTs are warranted to explore the association of remimazolam and POD. Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO CRD42024544122.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文