Analysis of Automated Tools for FAIRness Evaluation: A Literature Perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Azevedo, Leonardo Guerreiro [1 ]
Banaggia, Gabriel [2 ]
Tesolin, Julio [3 ]
Cerqueira, Renato [1 ]
机构
[1] IBM Corp, IBM Res, Avenida Republ Chile,330,11o floor, BR-20031170 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio de Janeiro, Dept Social Sci, Rua Marques Sao Vicente 225, BR-22451900 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Praca Gal, PGED IME, Tiburcio 80, BR-22290270 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
FAIR principles; FAIRness; FAIRness evaluation; Automated Tools for FAIRness Evaluation; Requirements for FAIRness Automated Tools;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-78955-7_15
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The FAIR Principles were introduced to address data challenges and improve the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability of digital resources, following several Semantic Web standards. 'FAIRness' corresponds to a percentage grade indicating how close a digital object is to abiding by those principles. Several tools have been developed to assess the FAIRness of data digital objects in support of enacting the FAIR Principles. This work offers an appraisal of tools that evaluate the FAIRness of such objects, focusing on fully automated solutions. We conduct a literature review about existing tools, extract from it a set of requirements they aim to fulfill, and assess how each one fares considering this ensemble. Our results help researchers, developers, and data stewards with an overview of the tools, including an analysis of tools' fulfillment to the elicited requirements, making explicit existing gaps, and giving directions to improvements needed.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 166
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated Evaluation Tools for Web and Mobile Accessibility: A Systematic Literature Review
    Dias, Joao
    Carvalho, Diana
    Paredes, Hugo
    Martins, Paulo
    Rocha, Tania
    Barroso, Joao
    INNOVATIONS IN BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS, IBICA 2021, 2022, 419 : 447 - 456
  • [2] Website Performance Analysis and Evaluation using Automated Tools
    Kumar, Niraj
    Kumar, Shubham
    Rajak, Rohit
    2021 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATION, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES AND OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES (ICEECCOT), 2021, : 210 - 214
  • [3] Conceptual Tools for the Analysis of Bioeconomic Fairness and Efficiency
    Douglass, Tom
    ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2023, 25 (1-2): : 23 - 35
  • [4] Evaluation of Free and Open Source Tools for Automated Software Composition Analysis
    Bottner, Laura
    Hermann, Artur
    Eppler, Jeremias
    Thüm, Thomas
    Kargl, Frank
    Proceedings: CSCS 2023 - 7th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium, 2023,
  • [5] Evaluation of Free and Open Source Tools for Automated Software Composition Analysis
    Bottner, Laura
    Hermann, Artur
    Eppler, Jeremias
    Thuem, Thomas
    Kargl, Frank
    7TH ACM COMPUTER SCIENCE IN CARS SYMPOSIUM, CSCS 2023, 2023,
  • [6] Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on the perspective of fairness utility
    Zhu, Qingyuan
    Li, Feng
    Wu, Jie
    Sun, Jiasen
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 151 (151)
  • [7] The Performance Evaluation of a Website using Automated Evaluation Tools
    Kwangsawad, Achaporn
    Jattamart, Aungkana
    Nusawat, Paingruthai
    2019 4TH TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (TIMES-ICON), 2019,
  • [8] Automated speech analysis tools for children's speech production: A systematic literature review
    McKechnie, J.
    Ahmed, B.
    Gutierrez-Osuna, R.
    Monroe, P.
    McCabe, P.
    Ballard, K. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2018, 20 (06) : 583 - 598
  • [9] AUTOMATED LITERATURE ANALYSIS
    KOIO, M
    NAUCHNO-TEKHNICHESKAYA INFORMATSIYA SERIYA 2-INFORMATSIONNYE PROTSESSY I SISTEMY, 1967, (06): : 15 - &
  • [10] Automated tools for subject matter expert evaluation of automated scoring
    Williamson, DM
    Bejar, II
    Sax, A
    APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2004, 17 (04) : 323 - 357