Inter-observer variation in gross tumour volume delineation of oesophageal cancer on MR, CT and PET/CT

被引:1
|
作者
Secerov-Ermenc, Ajra [1 ,2 ]
Peterlin, Primoz [1 ]
Anderluh, Franc [1 ]
But-Hadzic, Jasna [1 ,2 ]
Jeromen-Peressutti, Ana [1 ]
Velenik, Vaneja [1 ,2 ]
Segedin, Barbara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol Ljubljana, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zaloska 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
oesophageal cancer; gross tumour volume; positron emission tomography; magnetic resonance; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FDG-PET/CT; RADIATION TREATMENT; IMPACT; LENGTH; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; DEFINITION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.2478/raon-2024-0043
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of our study was to assess the inter-observer variability in delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) of oesophageal cancer on magnetic resonance (MR) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography and CT (PET/CT).Patients and methodsTwenty-three consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy were enrolled. All patients had PET/CT and MR imaging in treatment position. Five observers independently delineated the GTV on CT alone, MR alone, CT with co-registered MR, PET/CT alone and MR with co-registered PET/CT. Volumes of GTV were measured per patient and imaging modality. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index (CIgen), volumetric conformity index (VCI), planar conformity index (PCI) and inter-delineation distance (IDD) were calculated per patient and imaging modality. Linear mixed models were used for statistical analysis.ResultsGTV volume was significantly lower on MR (33.03 cm3) compared to CT (37.1 cm3; p = 0.002) and on PET/CT MR (35.2 cm3; p = 0.018) compared to PET/CT (39.1 cm3). The CIgen was lowest on CT (0.56) and highest on PET/CT MR (0.67). The difference in CIgen between MR (0.61) and CT was borderline significant (p = 0.048). The VCI was significantly higher on MR (0.71; p = 0.007) and on CT MR (0.71; p = 0.004) compared to CT (0.67). The PCI was significantly higher on CT MR (0.67; p = 0.031) compared to CT (0.64). The largest differences were observed in the cranio-caudal direction.ConclusionsThe highest inter-observer agreement was found for PET/CT MR and the lowest for CT. MR could reduce the difference in delineation between observers and provide additional information about the local extent of the tumour.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 587
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inter-observer variation in GTV delineation of esophageal cancer on MR, CT and PET CT
    Ermenc, A. Secerov
    Peterlin, P.
    Anderluh, F.
    Peressutti, A. Jeromen
    Hadzic, J. But
    Velenik, V.
    Segedin, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1096 - S1097
  • [2] Evaluating inter-observer variation in oesophageal target volume delineation
    Nicholas, O.
    Lewis, G.
    Thomas, B.
    Smyth, M.
    Spezi, E.
    Gwynne, S. H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S229 - S230
  • [3] Inter-observer variation of target volume delineation for CT-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy
    Elmali, Aysenur
    Biltekin, Fatih
    Sari, Sezin Yuce
    Gultekin, Melis
    Yuce, Deniz
    Yildiz, Ferah
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2023, 15 (04) : 253 - 260
  • [4] Inter-observer variability of clinical target volume delineation for bladder cancer using CT and cone beam CT
    Foroudi, F.
    Haworth, A.
    Pangehel, A.
    Wong, J.
    Roxby, P.
    Duchesne, G.
    Williams, S.
    Tai, K. H.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 53 (01): : 100 - 106
  • [5] Inter-observer contouring variation of multiple pelvic structures on CT and MR for prostate cancer
    Roach, D.
    Ebert, M. A.
    Jameson, M.
    Dowling, J. A.
    Kennedy, A.
    Greer, P.
    Holloway, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S869 - S870
  • [6] INTER AND INTRA OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE GROSS TUMOUR VOLUME (GTV) DELINEATION FOR GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM)
    Burton, K.
    Jefferies, S.
    Jena, R.
    Estali, V.
    Burnet, N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S27 - S27
  • [7] 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT on gross tumour volume delineation for radiotherapy planning of oesophageal cancer
    Zhao, Liang
    Chen, Shanyu
    Chen, Sijia
    Pang, Yizhen
    Dai, Yaqing
    Hu, Shenping
    Lin, Li'e
    Fu, Lirong
    Sun, Long
    Wu, Hua
    Chen, Haojun
    Lin, Qin
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 158 : 55 - 61
  • [8] Target Volume Delineation for Preoperative Radiotherapy of Rectal Cancer: Inter-Observer Variability and Potential Impact of FDG-PET/CT Imaging
    Krengli, Marco
    Cannillo, Barbara
    Turri, Lucia
    Bagnasacco, Paolo
    Berretta, Laura
    Ferrara, Teresa
    Galliano, Mario
    Gribaudo, Sergio
    Melano, Antonella
    Munoz, Fernando
    Sciacero, Piera
    Tseroni, Vassiliki
    Bassi, Maria Chiara
    Brambilla, Marco
    Inglese, Eugenio
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2010, 9 (04) : 393 - 398
  • [9] Inter-observer variability of manual contour delineation of structures in CT
    Joskowicz, Leo
    Cohen, D.
    Caplan, N.
    Sosna, J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 1391 - 1399
  • [10] Inter-observer variability of manual contour delineation of structures in CT
    Leo Joskowicz
    D. Cohen
    N. Caplan
    J. Sosna
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1391 - 1399