Food processing according to the NOVA classification is not associated with glycemic index and glycemic load: results from an analysis of 1995 food items

被引:2
|
作者
Basile, Anthony J. [1 ,2 ]
Ruiz-Tejada, Anaissa [1 ]
Mohr, Alex E. [3 ]
Morales, Angel C. [1 ]
Hjelm, Ellinor [1 ]
Brand-Miller, Jennie C. [4 ]
Atkinson, Fiona S. [4 ]
Sweazea, Karen L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] State Univ Oneonta New York, Oneonta, NY 13820 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Coll Hlth Solut, Tempe, AZ 85004 USA
[4] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, Australia
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION | 2024年 / 120卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ultraprocessed food; glycemic index; glycemic load; food processing; minimally processed food; CONSUMPTION; SATIETY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.08.024
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) comprise most calories in the United States diet. Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are measures of the quality and quantity of carbohydrates in food based on their effect on postprandial blood glucose. Diets high in UPFs and GI/GL are associated with chronic metabolic diseases but the relationship between them is unclear. Objectives: Our objective was to examine the GI and GL of foods assigned to NOVA food processing groups. We hypothesized that GI and GL would be lowest in minimally processed foods (MPFs) compared to processed food (PRF) and UPF (with no difference between PRF and UPF). Methods: GI and GL values produced by healthy individuals for 1995 food items were collated from published sources. Food items were manually coded by processing levels according to NOVA classification. In addition, as the effects of processing on glycemic potential may vary between types of foods, food items were coded into 8 groups (beans, nuts, and seeds; beverages; dairy; fats and sweets; fruit; grains; fi sh, meat, and poultry; and vegetables). Multilevel linear modeling was used to determine significance with an alpha value of 0.05. Results: The effect of food processing on GI and GL was contrary to our hypothesis as means did not differ significantly across processing levels: GI-MPF: 54.1 f 19.5, PRF: 53.2 f 18.9, UPF: 49.3 f 18.1 (P = 0.712); GL-MPF: 17.1 f 10.3, PRF: 15.8 f 12.4, UPF; 11.5 f 7.9 (P = 0.890). Within food groups, there was no significant association between processing level and GI (P = 0.184), but GL was inversely associated with grains and vegetables (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Across analyzed foods, GI and GL do not differ between processing levels, whereas GL was lower in ultraprocessed grains and vegetables than MPF. Any potential adverse outcomes associated with UPF are unlikely to be related to effects on glycemia. This project was preregistered at the Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries through the Center for Open Science as 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJWG9.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1042
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GLYCEMIC INDEX, GLYCEMIC LOAD AND SATIETY SENSATION IN INDUSTRIALIZED FOOD
    Ibarra Salas, M. J.
    Mata Obregon, M. C.
    Novelo Huerta, H. I.
    Sanchez Murillo, M. E.
    Cantu Martinez, P. C.
    Garza Juarez, A.
    Perez Chavez, F.
    Llaca Diaz, J. M.
    Garza Sepulveda, G.
    Olivo Zamora, B. M.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2013, 63 : 489 - 489
  • [2] FOOD-PROCESSING AND THE GLYCEMIC INDEX
    BRAND, JC
    NICHOLSON, PL
    THORBURN, AW
    TRUSWELL, AS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1985, 42 (06): : 1192 - 1196
  • [3] Compiling glycemic index and glycemic load values for addition to a food composition database
    Martin, Carrie L.
    Murphy, Suzanne P.
    Au, Donna Lyn M.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS, 2008, 21 (06) : 469 - 473
  • [4] Influence glycemic index/load on glycemic response, appetite, and food intake in healthy humans
    Alfenas, RCG
    Mattes, RD
    DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (09) : 2123 - 2129
  • [5] Changes in dietary glycemic index and glycemic load in Australian adults from 1995 to 2012
    Kusnadi, Devina Tri Lestrai
    Barclay, Alan W.
    Brand-Miller, Jennie C.
    Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 106 (01): : 189 - 198
  • [6] MODULATING ROLE OF MORUS ALBA LEAVES ON THE GLYCEMIC INDEX AND GLYCEMIC LOAD OF SELECTED FOOD PRODUCTS - BIOACTIVE FOOD PROJECT
    Czlapka-Matyasik, M.
    Kostrzewa-Tarnowska, A.
    Fejfer, M.
    Mierkiewicz, J.
    Jeszka, J.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2013, 63 : 1707 - 1707
  • [7] Influence of glycemic index/load on glycemic response, appetite, and food intake in healthy humans - Response
    Alfenas, RCG
    Mattes, RD
    DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (02) : 475 - 476
  • [8] Impact of food processing on the glycemic index (GI) of potato products
    Nayak, Balunkeswar
    Berrios, Jose De J.
    Tang, Juming
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 56 : 35 - 46
  • [9] Influence of Cultivar, Processing, and Food Form on the Glycemic Index of Barley
    Aldughpassi, Ahmed
    Wolever, Thomas M. S.
    Abdel-Aal, Elsayed M.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2012, 26
  • [10] Glycemic index and glycemic load in relation to food and nutrient intake and metabolic risk factors in a Dutch population
    Du, Huaidong
    van der A, Daphne L.
    van Bakel, Marit M. E.
    van der Kallen, Carla J. H.
    Blaak, Ellen E.
    van Greevenbroek, Marleen M. J.
    Jansen, Eugene H. J. M.
    Nijpels, Giel
    Stehouwer, Coen D. A.
    Dekker, Jacqueline M.
    Feskens, Edith J. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2008, 87 (03): : 655 - 661