Affordances of Electrostatic Potential Maps in Promoting Use of Electronic Features and Causal Reasoning in Organic Chemistry

被引:3
|
作者
Farheen, Ayesha [1 ]
Demirdogen, Betul [2 ]
Chem, Bradley [3 ]
Nelsen, Isaiah [4 ]
Weinrich, Melissa [3 ]
Lewis, Scott E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Chem, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Dept Math & Sci Educ, TR-67300 Zonguldak, Turkiye
[3] Univ Northern Colorado, Dept Chem & Biochem, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Dept Chem, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Chemical Education Research; Organic Chemistry; EXPLANATIONS; THINKING; RULES; MODES;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00500
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Instructional materials in organic chemistry include a wide variety of representations, such as chemical formulas, line-angle diagrams, ball-and-stick diagrams, and electrostatic potential maps (EPMs). Students tend to focus on explicit features of a representation while they are reasoning about chemical concepts. This study examined the affordances of electrostatic potential maps in students' approaches when the maps were integrated into four foundational organic chemistry problems using an experimental design approach. First-semester organic chemistry students were surveyed from two different institutions, where they made predictions and explained their reasoning behind identifying an electrophilic site, predicting the product, selecting the faster reaction, and classifying a mechanism. Students were randomly assigned to one of four surveys that differed by the representation they were given for the prompts: chemical formula, line-angle diagram, ball-and-stick diagram, and EPM. Responses from students with EPMs were analyzed and compared to responses from students with the non-EPM representations. Results indicated that students with EPMs had higher performance depending on the problem. They were also more likely to cite electronic features such as electron density, nucleophilicity, etc., and were more likely to use causal reasoning in their explanations. This study offers evidence in support of affordances of EPMs in promoting students' use of electronic features and causal reasoning. This evidence adds to the chemistry education literature by offering a potential means for promoting students' use of electronic features and causal reasoning by incorporating EPMs into assessment items. Implications for instruction include using EPMs in both instruction and assessment as a tool to help students build skills around invoking electrostatics and causal reasoning to solve problems in organic chemistry.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Textbook Treatments of Electrostatic Potential Maps in General and Organic Chemistry
    Hinze, Scott R.
    Williamson, Vickie M.
    Deslongchamps, Ghislain
    Shultz, Mary Jane
    Williamson, Kenneth C.
    Rapp, David N.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 90 (10) : 1275 - 1281
  • [2] Causal mechanistic reasoning in organic chemistry
    Crandell, Olivia
    Cooper, Melanie
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [3] Organic chemistry students' usage of electrostatic potential maps across an unstructured and structured card sort
    Robinson, Chloe K.
    Weinrich, Melissa
    Lewis, Scott E.
    CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2025,
  • [4] Electrostatic potential maps: Use and misuse.
    Shusterman, AJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 221 : U257 - U257
  • [5] Deriving of electrostatic potential maps and use of these as a means to predict reactivities between species
    Bagga, Kishore
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 253
  • [6] Ab initio Molecular Electrostatic Potential Grid Maps for Quantitative Similarity Calculations of Organic Compounds
    Gerhard Buchbauer
    Alexander Klinsky
    Petra Weiß-Greiler
    Peter Wolschann
    Molecular modeling annual, 2000, 6 (4) : 425 - 432
  • [7] Quantification and classification of substituent effects in organic chemistry: a theoretical molecular electrostatic potential study
    Remya, Geetha S.
    Suresh, Cherumuttathu H.
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 18 (30) : 20615 - 20626
  • [8] Ionization in organic thin films: Electrostatic potential, electronic polarization, and dopants in pentacene films
    Topham, Benjamin J.
    Soos, Zoltan G.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2011, 84 (16)
  • [9] Electrons in motion: Use of an electronic journal for the organic chemistry course.
    Harris, DF
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 219 : U441 - U441
  • [10] Teaching abductive reasoning for use as a problem-solving tool in organic chemistry and beyond
    Wackerly, Jay Wm.
    Wentzel, Michael T.
    Zingales, Sarah K.
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9