Models for Facilitating Government-Funded Activities in the Post-ISS LEO Ecosystem

被引:0
|
作者
Rodgers, Erica [1 ]
Joseph, Nikolai [1 ]
Wright, Kenneth [1 ]
Ray, Grace [1 ]
Cox, Christie [2 ]
Craven, Patrick [3 ]
Hay, Jason [3 ]
Hernandez, Amanda [3 ]
Lussos, Rachael [4 ]
Robakidze, Maia [5 ]
机构
[1] NASA Headquarters, Off Technol Policy & Strategy, Washington, DC 20546 USA
[2] NASA Headquarters, Space Operat Mission Directorate, Washington, DC 20546 USA
[3] BryceTech, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[4] Amer Univ, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[5] Freedom Informat Syst Inc, Madison, AL 35758 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
NASA is preparing for the retirement of the ISS and transition of LEO activities to one or more Commercial LEO Destinations (CLDs) by 2030. This transition necessitates new models for connecting NASA and other government-funded users of the LEO environment to platforms and opportunities. This paper describes for consideration six models for facilitating government-funded activities in the post-ISS LEO ecosystem. These six models are illustrative and represent a wide trade space of potential options, each relying on unique mechanisms for facilitating activities on one or more commercial LEO platforms or vehicles. We assessed each model across three possible future scenarios varying in number and diversity of LEO activities and commercial offerings, and across five stakeholder-driven model evaluation criteria. We present the highlights of the analysis, including ways to modify and strengthen each model. The Government Research Broker model performs best across all future scenarios, followed by Innovation Campus, Anchor Tenant, and Fee for Service. While Matchmaker and Institute Network exhibit positive aspects, these models perform most favorably in future scenarios with well-established communities and markets. While each model has strengths and weaknesses, no single model in its current form performs well across all criteria in all three future scenarios. NASA leadership can adjust models as desired to align closer to their priorities using combinations of unique model mechanisms. A model that meets leadership priorities is likely a combination of features from multiple models.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Models and mechanisms for evaluating government-funded research - An international comparison
    Coryn, Chris L. S.
    Hattie, John A.
    Scriven, Michael
    Hartmann, David J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2007, 28 (04) : 437 - 457
  • [2] Government-funded cultural industry projects models and issues research
    Zhan Shaowen
    Tian Bailu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, ARTS, SOCIAL SCIENCE AND ECONOMICS (MSETASSE 2015), 2015, 41 : 1317 - 1320