Review of explicit models for photovoltaic cell electrical characterization

被引:0
|
作者
Pedroza-Diaz, Alfredo [1 ]
Rodrigo, Pedro M. [1 ]
Davalos-Orozco, Oscar [1 ]
De-la-Vega, Eduardo [2 ]
Valera-Albacete, Alvaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Panamer, Fac Ingn, Jose Maria Escriva de Balaguer 101, Aguascalientes 20296, Mexico
[2] Univ Panamer, Fac Ingn, Augusto Rodin 498, Mexico City 03920, Mexico
[3] Univ Jaen UJA, Adv Photovolta Technol AdPVTech, CEACTEMA, Las Lagunillas Campus, Jaen 23071, Spain
来源
关键词
Explicit model; Model accuracy; Photovoltaics; Solar cell model; J-V MODEL; ILLUMINATED SOLAR-CELL; PARAMETER EXTRACTION; ANALYTICAL DERIVATION; PV SYSTEM; ALGORITHM; IDENTIFICATION; MODULE; SINGLE; FORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114979
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For modeling solar cells, the single diode model presents difficulties in implementation and is expensive computationally because it involves a transcendental and implicit mathematical equation. Some authors have proposed explicit, easy-to-use, and computationally efficient models that approximate its behavior. It is challenging to select the proper model for each specific application because the different proposals were tested for different solar panels, operating conditions, and performance metrics, and, therefore, a direct comparison based on the published information is not possible. In this study, the existing explicit models are reviewed, presenting their equations and discussing their mathematical approximations. Four new models are introduced, and a classification of models is proposed. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of all the models under many photovoltaic technologies and operating conditions is carried out using the same performance metrics and parameter extraction method. This allows developing a framework that makes the selection of models easier for each application. The comparative results show that three models proposed by the research team are more accurate than the implicit approach, with average root mean squared errors as low as 0.41 % (versus 0.54 % error of the implicit model). However, the parameters in these models lack physical sense. Among the explicit models incorporating physical parameters and formulated with elementary functions, the most accurate is based on a first order Pade<acute accent> approximation (0.55 % error). The ranking of models is expected to become a valuable tool for the photovoltaic community in various solar cell modeling tasks.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Models for the electrical characterization of high concentration photovoltaic cells and modules: A review
    Rodrigo, P.
    Fernandez, E. F.
    Almonacid, F.
    Perez-Higueras, P. J.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 26 : 752 - 760
  • [2] Research on Photovoltaic Cell Models: A Review
    Fan Jingxun
    Li Shaowu
    Zhu Xianping
    Li Yan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2021), 2021, : 1006 - 1011
  • [3] Review of methods for the calculation of cell temperature in high concentration photovoltaic modules for electrical characterization
    Rodrigo, P.
    Fernandez, E. F.
    Almonacid, F.
    Perez-Higueras, P. J.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 38 : 478 - 488
  • [4] Assessment of Explicit Models for Different Photovoltaic Technologies
    Pindado, Santiago
    Cubas, Javier
    Roibas-Millan, Elena
    Bugallo-Siegel, Francisco
    Sorribes-Palmer, Felix
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (06)
  • [5] Photovoltaic Cell Operating Temperature Models: A Review of Correlations and Parameters
    Santos, Leticia de Oliveira
    de Carvalho, Paulo Cesar Marques
    Carvalho Filho, Clodoaldo de Oliveira
    IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2022, 12 (01): : 179 - 190
  • [6] Electrical Characterization of CIGSSe Photovoltaic Modules
    Caruso, M.
    Miceli, R.
    Guarino, S.
    Galluzzo, F. Ricco
    Roscia, M.
    Viola, F.
    2017 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLEAN ELECTRICAL POWER (ICCEP): RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT, 2017, : 36 - 40
  • [7] Electrical characterization of photovoltaic porous Si
    Ünal, Bayram
    Bayliss, Sue
    Journal of Porous Materials, 2000, 7 (01) : 295 - 298
  • [8] Explicit characterization of inclusions in electrical impedance tomography
    Brühl, M
    SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS, 2001, 32 (06) : 1327 - 1341
  • [9] Assessment of implicit and explicit models for different photovoltaic modules technologies
    Boutana, N.
    Mellit, A.
    Lughi, V.
    Pavan, A. Massi
    ENERGY, 2017, 122 : 128 - 143
  • [10] Review of techniques based on artificial neural networks for the electrical characterization of concentrator photovoltaic technology
    Almonacid, Florencia
    Fernandez, Eduardo F.
    Mellit, Adel
    Kalogirou, Soteris
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 75 : 938 - 953