Twenty-Five Years of Scientific Production on Geoparks from the Perspective of Bibliometric Analysis Using PRISMA

被引:0
|
作者
Nyulas, Judith [1 ]
Dezsi, Stefan [2 ,3 ]
Nita, Adrian-Florin [4 ]
Magyari-Saska, Zsolt [4 ]
Frey, Marie-Luise [5 ]
Horvath, Alpar [4 ]
机构
[1] Babes Bolyai Univ, Fac Geog, Doctoral Sch Geog, Cluj Napoca 400006, Romania
[2] Babes Bolyai Univ, Fac Geog, Dept Human Geog & Tourism, Cluj Napoca 400006, Romania
[3] Babes Bolyai Univ, Ctr Res Settlements & Urbanism, Fac Geog, 400006 Cluj Napoca, Romania
[4] Babes Bolyai Univ, Gheorgheni Univ Extens, Fac Geog, Cluj Napoca 400006, Romania
[5] Global Geopk Network Execut Board & Terra Outreach, Ooserstr 21, D-54568 Daun, Germany
关键词
geopark; UNESCO geoparks; Bibliometrix; PRISMA; screening method; bibliometric analysis; quantitative analysis; scientific performance; future forecast; core sources; sustainability; GEOLOGICAL HERITAGE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; SCIENCE; GEOHERITAGE; SCOPUS; WEB; GEODIVERSITY; PROTECTION; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/su17052218
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the last 25 years, research on geoparks has moved from basic research to comprehensive multidisciplinary studies related to the creation and development of geoparks, integrating the principle of sustainability. This research focuses on exploring geoparks as the core subject. The aim of this study is to synthesize the heterogeneous body of knowledge about geoparks in an exhaustive way by leveraging a multi-database bibliometric approach. The methodology applied is based on quantitative bibliometric analysis using R, including its application for non-coders and ensuring reliability with the PRISMA Statement framework. Ten databases were taken as the sources of research papers: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Nature Journals, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis, Wiley Journals, IEEE Xplore, and CABI. The method we used has limitations, providing a restricted number of trends aligned and scaled to the database boundary conditions used in analysis. The main goals of quantitative bibliometric analysis are as follows: (1) The impact of data integration-Evaluating how merging the data from the ten databases improves research coverage. (2) Global research trends-Identifying the evolution of geopark-related studies over time. (3) Three-year forecast-Predicting the upcoming research directions using a polynomial regression model. (4) Academic performance-Assessing geographical distribution, citation impact, and productivity using bibliometric laws. (5) Conceptual contribution-Identifying the key research themes that drive future studies and potential areas for exploration. Among these, we highlighted the key elements. The integration of the ten databases provides 63% greater insight into scientific research compared to that of the Web of Science (WoS) database. Geographically, the scientific output spans 102 countries, with China leading in production over the last two decades. The most impactful paper has accumulated 768 citations, while Ruben D.A. and Wu Fandong emerge as the most prolific authors. According to the bibliometric law, the core source of scientific output is Geoheritage. The future research directions are expected to address global challenges, particularly natural disasters in alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Additionally, GIS-based subtopics leveraging advanced technologies for analyzing, mapping, and promoting geological resources represent a promising area for further exploration. The projections indicate that by the end of 2026, scientific production in this field could reach 5226 published papers, underscoring the growing significance of geopark research and interdisciplinary advancements.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Twenty-five years of Accounting History: A bibliometric analysis
    Nerantzidis, Michail
    Vatis, Stylianos Efstratios
    ACCOUNTING HISTORY, 2024, 29 (04) : 661 - 697
  • [2] Twenty-five years ofGender, Work and Organization: A bibliometric analysis
    Kataria, Aakanksha
    Kumar, Satish
    Pandey, Nitesh
    GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION, 2021, 28 (01): : 85 - 118
  • [3] Twenty-five years of Geography production
    Rolfe, Diane
    GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 100 : 159 - 163
  • [4] Twenty-Five Years of Research in the Journal of Special Education Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Sinha, Deblina Bhattacharjee
    Sinha, Satyajit
    Anu, G. S.
    Islam, Md Tariqul
    Sahoo, Debasis
    JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 39 (02) : 174 - 189
  • [5] Twenty-Five Years of the Journal of Global Information Technology Management: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Rathore, Bhawana
    Biswas, Baidyanath
    Gupta, Rohit
    Palvia, Prashant
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 26 (03) : 181 - 196
  • [6] TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF "E&M ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT": A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
    Yao, Xuan
    Xu, Zeshui
    Zizka, Miroslav
    E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2023, 26 (01): : 4 - 24
  • [7] Twenty-five years of the Journal of Risk Research: a bibliometric overview
    Guan, Li
    Merigo, Jose M.
    Lofstedt, Ragnar E.
    Wardman, Jamie K.
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [8] Twenty-five years of Review of Financial Economics: A bibliometric overview
    Baker, H. Kent
    Kumar, Satish
    Pattnaik, Debidutta
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (01) : 3 - 23
  • [9] Twenty-Five Years of Group Decision and Negotiation: A Bibliometric Overview
    Laengle, Sigifredo
    Modak, Nikunja Mohan
    Merigo, Jose M.
    Zurita, Gustavo
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2018, 27 (04) : 505 - 542
  • [10] Twenty-Five Years of Group Decision and Negotiation: A Bibliometric Overview
    Sigifredo Laengle
    Nikunja Mohan Modak
    Jose M. Merigo
    Gustavo Zurita
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2018, 27 : 505 - 542