共 6 条
A Multidimensional Exploration of the Link Between Religiosity and Mental Wellbeing for 2SLGBTQI+Canadians
被引:0
|作者:
Prada, Kevin
[1
]
Levesque, Annabel
[2
]
机构:
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Educ & Counselling Psychol, 3700 McTavish St, Su 614, Montreal, PQ H3A 1Y2, Canada
[2] Univ St Boniface, Dept Psychol, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
关键词:
Queer;
Canada;
intersectionality;
faith;
minority stress;
mental health;
2SLGBTQI+;
LGBTQI plus;
nonaffirming;
SEXUAL ORIENTATION;
INTERNALIZED HOMOPHOBIA;
REGRESSION-COEFFICIENTS;
HEALTH CONTINUUM;
SOCIAL SUPPORT;
GAY MEN;
TRANSGENDER;
SPIRITUALITY;
IDENTITY;
STRESS;
D O I:
10.1080/00918369.2025.2460977
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
2SLGBTQI+ Canadians occupy various prejudicial cis/heteronormative systems, as illustrated by rapidly increasing homo/bi/transphobia and gender- and sexuality-based violence targeting this population. As a result, their mental wellbeing is progressively deteriorating; the identification of risk and protective factors for this population's mental wellbeing is vital. Religiosity, although protective for other populations, may be such a risk factor for the mental wellbeing of some 2SLGBTQI+ people. This study investigated and compared how five independent dimensions of religiosity-private practice, ideology, intellect, public practice, and experience-are linked to mental wellbeing for 2SLGBTQI+ Canadians who report a religious belief. Through its cross-sectional design, this study was conducted among self-identified 2SLGBTQI+ people in Canada (N = 903) by means of an online survey from November 2022 to January 2023. The sample contained representation from every Canadian province and territory, as well as diversity in terms of sexual orientations and gender identities. The results of multiple regression analyses, which further compared participants with and without a current religious affiliation, confirmed that religiosity is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon, with dimensions independently serving as protective (i.e. experience and private practice) or as risk (i.e. ideology) factors for 2SLGBTQI+ Canadians. Implications for research and praxis are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文