Therapeutic efficacy and prognostic indicators in re-resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Insights from a retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Fan, Qi [1 ]
Wei, Pengcheng [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ma, Delin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cheng, Qian [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gao, Jie [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhu, Jiye [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Zhao [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Jishuitan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Peoples Hosp, 11 Xizhimen South St, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Surg Basic Res Lab Liver Cirrhosis & L, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Ctr Liver Canc Diag & Treatment, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Inst Organ Transplantat, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma; Re-resection; Prognosis; Survival analysis; Immune microenvironment; REPEAT HEPATECTOMY; INTRAHEPATIC METASTASIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; SURVIVAL; 3RD;
D O I
10.1016/j.sopen.2024.12.004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of re-resection in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC), identify prognostic factors, and provide clinical guidance. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 130 rHCC patients undergoing re-resection and 60 primary HCC patients undergoing initial hepatectomy at Peking University People's Hospital (2014-2022). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. Prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). DFS was similar between groups (30.8 vs. 32.2 months, P = 0.612). The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year DFS rates for the re-resection group were 88.5 %, 64.9 %, and 56.7 %, respectively, versus 88.3 %, 65.0 %, and 53.3 % for the primary resection group. OS was lower in the re-resection group (36.1 vs. 47.2 months, P = 0.041) with 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates of 90.8 %, 73.1 %, and 60.0 %, compared to 95.0 %, 80.0 %, and 68.3 % for the primary resection group. Significant factors affecting DFS were Child-Pugh classification (P = 0.044), time to recurrence (P = 0.002), tumor differentiation (P = 0.044), and satellite nodules (P = 0.019). Factors influencing OS included Child-Pugh classification (P = 0.040), time to recurrence (P = 0.002), and tumor differentiation (P = 0.032). Conclusions: Re-resection is an effective treatment option for rHCC, with favorable outcomes as measured by DFS and OS, though OS is lower compared to initial hepatectomy. Key prognostic factors include Child-Pugh classification, time to recurrence, tumor differentiation, and satellite nodules.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of re-resection in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
    Bednarsch, Jan
    Czigany, Zoltan
    Heij, Lara R.
    Amygdalos, Iakovos
    Heise, Daniel
    Bruners, Philip
    Ulmer, Tom F.
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    Lang, Sven A.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (06) : 2381 - 2391
  • [2] The role of re-resection in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
    Jan Bednarsch
    Zoltan Czigany
    Lara R. Heij
    Iakovos Amygdalos
    Daniel Heise
    Philip Bruners
    Tom F. Ulmer
    Ulf P. Neumann
    Sven A. Lang
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022, 407 : 2381 - 2391
  • [3] Feasibility of Laparoscopic Re-resection for Patients with Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chan, Albert C. Y.
    Poon, Ronnie T. P.
    Chok, Kenneth S. H.
    Cheung, Tan To
    Chan, See Ching
    Lo, Chung Mau
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (05) : 1141 - 1146
  • [4] Feasibility of Laparoscopic Re-resection for Patients with Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Albert C. Y. Chan
    Ronnie T. P. Poon
    Kenneth S. H. Chok
    Tan To Cheung
    See Ching Chan
    Chung Mau Lo
    World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 1141 - 1146
  • [5] Re-resection for metachronous primary hepatocellular carcinoma: is it justified?
    Chok, Kenneth Siu Ho
    Chan, See Ching
    Poon, Ronnie Tung Ping
    Fan, Sheung Tat
    Lo, Chung Mau
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 82 (1-2) : 63 - 67
  • [6] Locally recurrent esophageal carcinoma: When is re-resection indicated?
    Schipper, PH
    Cassivi, SD
    Deschamps, C
    Rice, DC
    Nichols, FC
    Allen, MS
    Pairolero, PC
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 80 (03): : 1001 - 1006
  • [7] Survival outcome of re-resection for recurrent liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Chok, Kenneth S. H.
    Cheung, Tan To
    Chan, Albert C. Y.
    Dai, Wing Chiu
    Chan, See Ching
    Fan, Sheung Tat
    Poon, Ronnie T. P.
    Lo, Chung Mau
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 84 (7-8) : 545 - 549
  • [8] Treatment for intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: Salvage liver transplantation or re-resection/radiofrequency ablation? A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Zhang, Xiaoyun
    Li, Chuan
    Wen, Tianfu
    Peng, Wei
    Yan, Lunan
    Yang, Jiayin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 46 : 178 - 185
  • [9] Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC
    Yin, Xieling
    Hua, Tianqi
    Liang, Chi
    Chen, Zhong
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (04) : 1035 - 1045
  • [10] Preoperative Predictors Including the Role of Inflammatory Indices in Predicting Early Recurrence After Re-resection for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Yuxin Guo
    Darren W. Chua
    Ye-Xin Koh
    Ser-Yee Lee
    Peng-Chung Cheow
    Juinn-Huar Kam
    Jin-Yao Teo
    Pierce K. Chow
    Alexander Y. Chung
    London L. Ooi
    Chung-Yip Chan
    Brian K. P. Goh
    World Journal of Surgery, 2019, 43 : 2587 - 2594