Preferences of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare professionals on using noninvasive prenatal testing to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes: a discrete choice experiment

被引:0
|
作者
Becking, Ellis [1 ]
Akkerman, Elisabeth [2 ]
Scheffer, Peter [2 ]
Smith, Ian [3 ]
Stemkens, Daphne [4 ]
Bax, Caroline J. [5 ,6 ]
Bekker, Mireille N. [2 ]
Crombag, Neeltje [7 ]
Schuit, Ewoud [8 ]
Henneman, Lidewij [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Obstet, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] VSOP, Soest, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Obstet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Amsterdam Reprod & Dev Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[9] Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Pregnancy; OBSTETRICS; GYNAECOLOGY; CELL-FREE DNA; DOWN-SYNDROME; PREECLAMPSIA; NIPT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088304
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to screen for fetal aneuploidies by analysing cell-free DNA in maternal plasma is available to pregnant women worldwide. In the future, the scope of NIPT could potentially be expanded to the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the preferences of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare professionals on this new test purpose of NIPT. Design A discrete choice experiment was designed to assess participants' preferences on the use of NIPT to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes regarding three attributes on test characteristics: test accuracy rate, unnecessary intervention rate and false reassurance rate. A questionnaire assessed general attitudes towards using noninvasive prenatal testing to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. Setting Dutch prenatal healthcare system. Participants Pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and obstetric healthcare professionals. Results In total, 1580 pregnant women and 308 obstetric healthcare professionals participated in the discrete choice experiment. Higher test accuracy, fewer unnecessary interventions and less false reassurance all had a statistically significant (p<0.05) impact on the preference for a test. For pregnant women, the most important test characteristic when choosing a preferred test was the test accuracy rate, while for obstetric healthcare professionals, the most important test characteristic was the unnecessary intervention rate. The false reassurance rate was the least important test characteristic for both groups. Overall, 74% (n=1181) of pregnant women (strongly) agreed that NIPT to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes should be offered to pregnant women compared with 49% (n=151) of obstetric healthcare professionals. Conclusions Most pregnant women have a positive attitude towards using NIPT to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with slightly less than half of the obstetric healthcare professionals. Pregnant women prioritise a prognostic test with higher test accuracy, while obstetric healthcare professionals prioritise a test that results in fewer unnecessary interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Women's and healthcare professionals' preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment
    Beulen, Lean
    Grutters, Janneke P. C.
    Faas, Brigitte H. W.
    Feenstra, Ilse
    Groenewoud, Hans
    van Vugt, John M. G.
    Bekker, Mireille N.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 35 (06) : 549 - 557
  • [2] Pregnant women's and policymakers' preferences for the expansion of noninvasive prenatal screening: A discrete choice experiment approach study
    Nguyen, Hung Manh
    Baradaran, Mohammad
    Daigle, Gaetan
    Nshimyumukiza, Leon
    Guertin, Jason Robert
    Reinharz, Daniel
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (08)
  • [3] Women's preferences for prenatal tests A discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal testing with current invasive tests
    Ingvarsdettir, Sigrun
    Stefansdottir, Vigdis
    Gottfreosdottir, Helga
    LAEKNABLADID, 2016, 102 (06): : 277 - 282
  • [4] Exploring prenatal testing preferences among US pregnant individuals: A discrete choice experiment
    Siranosian, Jennifer
    Lewis, Celine
    Hill, Melissa
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2024, 33 (03) : 699 - 708
  • [5] Evaluation of preferences of women and healthcare professionals in Singapore for implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome
    Barrett, Angela Natalie
    Advani, Henna Vishal
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Su, Lin Lin
    Biswas, Arijit
    Tan, Wei Ching
    Hill, Melissa
    Choolani, Mahesh
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (06) : 298 - 310
  • [6] Women's and health professionals' preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive tests
    Hill, Melissa
    Fisher, Jane
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Morris, Stephen
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (11) : 905 - 913
  • [7] Women's preferences for testing to predict breast cancer risk - a discrete choice experiment
    Wang, Yi
    Ho, Peh Joo
    Mou, Langming
    Li, Jingmei
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [8] Fetal fraction in noninvasive prenatal testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes
    Prensky, Lawrence M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 231 (01) : e55 - e55
  • [9] Preferences for prenatal testing among pregnant women, partners and health professionals
    Lund, Ida Charlotte Bay
    Becher, Naja
    Petersen, Olav Bjorn
    Hill, Melissa
    Chitty, Lyn
    Vogel, Ida
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 65 (05):
  • [10] Women's and Health Professionals' Preferences for Prenatal Tests for Down Syndrome: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Contrast Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis With Current Invasive Tests EDITOR COMMENT
    Hill, Melissa
    Fisher, Jane
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Morris, Stephen
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2013, 68 (03) : 171 - 173