Extraprostatic extension in multiparametric MRI; Is presurgical detection possible?

被引:0
|
作者
Ayaz, Muzaffer [1 ]
Gulseren, Yildiz [1 ]
Inan, Ibrahim [1 ]
Ok, Fesih [2 ]
Kabaalioglu, Adnan [1 ]
Yildirim, Asif [3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Sch, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Siirt Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Siirt, Turkiye
[3] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Dept Urol, Med Sch, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Capsular invasion; extraprostatic extension; multiparametric prostate MRI; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; tumor-capsule contact length; EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION; CAPSULAR CONTACT; PROSTATE-CANCER; LENGTH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction:Extraprostatic extension (EPE) is one of the important factors affecting the prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Therefore, preoperative evaluation of the presence of EPE is essential in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) examination. However, for the evaluation of mpMRI, objective criteria are needed to detect EPE, especially microscopic EPE. Aim:To evaluate the efficacy of 1.5T MRI using lesion length (LL) and tumor-capsule contact length (TCL) in detecting EPE in PCa. Methods:A total of 110 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy due to PCa were enrolled. Preoperative MR images were evaluated retrospectively by two independent observers who did not know the histopathological results. The observers evaluated LL and TCL. The radiological findings, including lesion location, were verified using histopathological mapping. Results:Multiparametric MRI examination of the prostate demonstrated low sensitivity (Observer 1; 40.4% and Observer 2; 40.4%) but high specificity (Observer 1; 96.6% and Observer 2; 84.5%), with significant differences for detecting EPE (Observer 1, P < 0.0001; Observer 2, P = 0.003). The increased PI-RADS score correlated positively with the increased EPE rate (P < 0.0001 for both observers). The mean LL and TCL values were statistically significantly higher in patients with EPE than in patients without EPE. The TCL was a significant parameter for EPE, with high sensitivity and low for both observers. For both observes the cutoff value of LL for EPE was 14.5 mm, and the cutoff value of TCL for EPE was 9.5 mm. Histopathological LL value (28 +/- 12,3 mm) was higher than radiological LLs (Observer 1; 22,14 +/- 10,15 mm and Observer 2; 19,06 +/- 8,61). Conclusion:The results revealed that 1.5T MRI demonstrated low sensitivity and high specificity in detecting EPE. The LL and TCL may be indirectly beneficial in detecting EPE. Considering the radiological underestimation of LL may be helpful before PCa surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:S639 / S644
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extraprostatic extension in multiparametric MRI; Is presurgical detection possible?
    Ayaz, Muzaffer
    Gulseren, Yildiz
    Inan, Ibrahim
    Ok, Fesih
    Kabaalioglu, Adnan
    Yildirim, Asif
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 : S639 - S644
  • [2] Assessing Extraprostatic Extension with Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: Mehralivand Extraprostatic Extension Grade or Extraprostatic Extension Likert Scale?
    Reisaeter, Lars A. R.
    Halvorsen, Ole J.
    Beisland, Christian
    Honore, Alfred
    Gravdal, Karsten
    Losnegard, Are
    Monssen, Jan
    Akslen, Lars A.
    Biermann, Martin
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2020, 2 (01):
  • [3] Computational Detection of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI Using Deep Learning
    Moroianu, Stefania L.
    Bhattacharya, Indrani
    Seetharaman, Arun
    Shao, Wei
    Kunder, Christian A.
    Sharma, Avishkar
    Ghanouni, Pejman
    Fan, Richard E.
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Rusu, Mirabela
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [4] A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Harmon, Stephanie
    Smith, Clayton
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Czarniecki, Marcin
    Gold, Samuel
    Hale, Graham
    Rayn, Kareem
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (03) : 709 - 719
  • [5] Re: A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI
    Siegel, Cary
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (03): : 440 - 441
  • [6] Abbreviated Protocols versus Multiparametric MRI for Assessment of Extraprostatic Extension in Prostatic Carcinoma: A Multireader Study
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Cocozza, Sirio
    Picchi, Stefano Giusto
    Stilo, Salvatore
    Persico, Francesco
    Creta, Massimiliano
    Longo, Nicola
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (08) : 4449 - 4454
  • [7] MRI-based nomograms and radiomics in presurgical prediction of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Luis F. Calimano-Ramirez
    Mayur K. Virarkar
    Mauricio Hernandez
    Savas Ozdemir
    Sindhu Kumar
    Dheeraj R. Gopireddy
    Chandana Lall
    K. C. Balaji
    Mutlu Mete
    Kazim Z. Gumus
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2379 - 2400
  • [8] MRI-based nomograms and radiomics in presurgical prediction of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Calimano-Ramirez, Luis F. F.
    Virarkar, Mayur K. K.
    Hernandez, Mauricio
    Ozdemir, Savas
    Kumar, Sindhu
    Gopireddy, Dheeraj R. R.
    Lall, Chandana
    Balaji, K. C.
    Mete, Mutlu
    Gumus, Kazim Z. Z.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (07) : 2379 - 2400
  • [9] Extraprostatic Tumor Extension: Comparison of Preoperative Multiparametric MRI Criteria and Histopathologic Correlation after Radical Prostatectomy
    Park, Kye Jin
    Kim, Mi-hyun
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [10] PREDICTORS OF IPSILATERAL EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION ON RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY USING 3-TESLA MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AND CONTEMPORARY PATHOLOGIC FEATURES
    Lu, Diane
    Truong, Matthew
    Weinberg, Eric
    Hollenberg, Gary
    Messing, Edward
    Wang, Bokai
    Feng, Changyong
    Miyamoto, Hiroshi
    Joseph, Jean
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E706 - E707