Stakeholders and their perspectives on perinatal depression screening: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Ting [1 ]
Yang, Yating [1 ]
Zhang, Shuyong [1 ]
Yuan, Yifei [1 ]
Guo, Hanyu [1 ]
Fang, Sitong [1 ]
Ji, Yan [1 ]
Tong, Jiancheng [1 ]
Wang, Yu [1 ]
Li, Yizhuo [1 ]
Yin, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ, Sch Nursing, Dalian, Peoples R China
关键词
Perinatal depression; Screening; Stakeholders; A systematic review; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; STATEMENT; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.11.009
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Untreated perinatal depression significantly affects the health outcomes of both mothers and infants and increases the economic burden on families and society. Early depression screening to identify at-risk women is essential, and involving key stakeholders ensures the successful integration of best practices within healthcare settings. Objectives: This study aims are: 1) to identify stakeholders from guidelines and studies that influence the implementation of perinatal depression screening; and 2) to provide a thematic summary of stakeholders' perspectives on the opportunities and challenges for scaling perinatal depression screening. Methods: A total of 10 databases were comprehensively searched from their inception until July 28 in 2024, encompassing both Chinese and English literature. Websites of academic organizations were also explored to obtain guidelines pertaining to perinatal depression screening. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Stakeholders' perspectives were analyzed using second-order thematic qualitative analysis. Results: A total of 3268 original articles and 104 guidelines were retrieved. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 57 original studies and 9 guidelines for data analysis. The most commonly mentioned stakeholders in perinatal depression screening were health care workers (n = 48) and perinatal women (n = 32), followed by healthcare leaders/managers (n = 16) and policymakers (n = 15). A total 23 articles reported stakeholders' perspectives, from which 291 quotes were extracted. Thematic synthesis identified 12 initial codes, which were summarized into three themes: perinatal depression screening practices, challenges in implementing screening, facilitating factors and opportunities for screening services. Conclusions: This study identified 17 types of stakeholders, with health care workers and perinatal women being the primary groups. Additionally, key challenges in perinatal depression screening were identified, highlighting the need for future research to focus cost, quality, and reimbursement structures to ensure the sustainable and scalable implementation of screening initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 203
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review on the acceptability of perinatal depression screening
    El-Den, Sarira
    O'Reilly, Claire L.
    Chen, Timothy F.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 188 : 284 - 303
  • [2] A systematic review on women preferences on screening for perinatal depression: preliminary results
    Gomez, C. M.
    Martin, C.
    Damme, R. V.
    Uriko, K.
    Perdih, T. S.
    Lozano, M. P. R.
    Toscano, C.
    Moreira, H.
    Kalcev, G.
    Zerafa, C.
    Lega, I.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 44
  • [3] The Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Perinatal Depression Screening: A Systematic Review
    Martinez-Borba, Veronica
    Suso-Ribera, Carlos
    Osma, Jorge
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2018, 21 (12) : 741 - 752
  • [4] A systematic review of screening for perinatal depression and anxiety in community-based settings
    Amritha Bhat
    Arjun Nanda
    Lauren Murphy
    Andrea L. Ball
    John Fortney
    Jodie Katon
    Archives of Women's Mental Health, 2022, 25 : 33 - 49
  • [5] A systematic review of screening for perinatal depression and anxiety in community-based settings
    Bhat, Amritha
    Nanda, Arjun
    Murphy, Lauren
    Ball, Andrea L.
    Fortney, John
    Katon, Jodie
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : 33 - 49
  • [6] Screening for perinatal depression: a review of tools and barriers
    Suchowiak, Sara
    Wszolek, Katarzyna
    Suwalska, Julia
    Lojko, Dorota
    Suwalska, Aleksandra
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIA I NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2020, 15 (1-2): : 60 - 69
  • [7] Gaps between current practice in perinatal depression screening and guideline recommendations: a systematic review
    Yang, Yating
    Wang, Ting
    Wang, Di
    Liu, Miaomiao
    Lun, Shi
    Ma, Shuang
    Yin, Juan
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 89 : 41 - 48
  • [8] Prenatal Attachment and Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review
    Rolle, Luca
    Giordano, Maura
    Santoniccolo, Fabrizio
    Trombetta, Tommaso
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)
  • [9] Perinatal Major Depression Biomarkers: A systematic review
    Serati, M.
    Redaelli, M.
    Buoli, M.
    Altamura, A. C.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 193 : 391 - 404
  • [10] Inflammatory biomarkers and perinatal depression: A systematic review
    Silva-Fernandes, Anabela
    Conde, Ana
    Marques, Margarida
    Caparros-Gonzalez, Rafael A.
    Fransson, Emma
    Mesquita, Ana Raquel
    Figueiredo, Barbara
    Skalkidou, Alkistis
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):