Does Intermediate Input Trade Liberalization Reduce Firm Air Pollution? Evidence From China's Accession to the WTO

被引:0
|
作者
Ao, Lejing [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
air pollution; input tariff; substitution effect; technology spillover; trade liberalization; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; IMPORTED INPUTS; KUZNETS CURVE; EXPORT; COMPETITION; TECHNOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS; ABATEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/rode.13222
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Trade and environmental protection are significant issues concerning sustainable development. This paper merges the Chinese enterprise pollution database from 1998 to 2007 with industry input tariffs. Utilizing China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a differences-in-differences strategy to examine the effects and mechanisms of intermediate input trade liberalization on firm air pollution. Our findings indicate that trade liberalization significantly reduces the total sulfur dioxide emissions and per unit output sulfur dioxide emissions of firms. In terms of mechanisms, we find that factor substitution and technology spillover effects of imported intermediate inputs play a crucial role. Trade liberalization increases the importation of intermediate inputs by enterprises, substituting for the consumption of fossil fuels. Furthermore, technology spillover effects lead to capital-biased technological progress for firms. We also observe that the emission reduction effects of trade liberalization are more pronounced for high-productivity, low-energy-consumption, and capital-intensive firms. Finally, our empirical evidence shows that environmental regulations and trade liberalization interact, and imposing high emission charges on firms enhances the emission reduction effects of imported intermediate inputs. This paper emphasizes the importance of developing countries implementing trade liberalization reforms for environmental protection.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade liberalization and entrepreneurship: Evidence from China's WTO accession
    Qin, Ni
    Kong, Dongmin
    Wang, Qin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2024, 147
  • [2] Trade Liberalization and Markup Dispersion: Evidence from China's WTO Accession
    Lu, Yi
    Yu, Linhui
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 7 (04) : 221 - 253
  • [3] Trade policy uncertainty and firm-level pollution emissions: Evidence from China's accession to the WTO
    Xi, Yanle
    Zhang, Liang
    Zhou, Yuxin
    Wu, Lamei
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 59
  • [4] Trade liberalization and regional labor market dynamics: Evidence from China's WTO accession
    Zhou, Shen
    He, Bing
    Ni, He-yong-le
    Pang, Shuqing
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2022, 125
  • [5] Input trade liberalisation, institution and markup: Evidence from China's accession to the WTO
    Mao, Qilin
    Xu, Jiayun
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2019, 42 (12): : 3537 - 3568
  • [6] Trade liberalization, input intermediaries and firm productivity: Evidence from China
    Defever, Fabrice
    Imbruno, Michele
    Kneller, Richard
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 126
  • [7] Trade policy uncertainty and innovation: Firm level evidence from China's WTO accession
    Liu, Qing
    Ma, Hong
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 127
  • [8] WTO accession, trade expansion, and air pollution: Evidence from China's county-level panel data
    Chen, Shuai
    Lin, Faqin
    Yao, Xi
    Zhang, Peng
    REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 28 (04) : 1020 - 1045
  • [9] EXPORT LIBERALIZATION AND EXPORTERS' LEVERAGE: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA'S WTO ACCESSION
    Zhao, Xiaotao
    Chen, Xiaoping
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023,
  • [10] Trade liberalization, labor market power, and misallocation across firms: Evidence from China's WTO accession☆
    Xie, Enze
    Xu, Mingzhi
    Yu, Miaojie
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2024, 171