Evaluation of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: large-scale single center experience, update to 1005 cases

被引:0
|
作者
Bicchierai, Giulia [1 ]
Migliaro, Giuliano [1 ]
Pugliese, Francesca [1 ]
Amato, Francesco [2 ]
De Benedetto, Diego [1 ]
Vanzi, Ermanno [1 ]
Di Naro, Federica [1 ]
Boeri, Cecilia [1 ]
Bellini, Chiara [1 ]
Vidali, Sofia [1 ]
Toncelli, Kassandra [1 ]
Bianchi, Simonetta [3 ]
Orzalesi, Lorenzo [4 ]
Miele, Vittorio [5 ]
Nori, Jacopo [1 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Osped Univ Careggi, Diagnost Senol Unit, Largo GA Brambilla 3, I-50134 Florence, Italy
[2] Osped San Giovanni Di Dio, Radiol Dept, Agrigento, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Div Pathol Anat, Florence, Italy
[4] Azienda Osped Univ Careggi, Oncol Dept, Breast Unit, Florence, Italy
[5] Azienda Osped Univ Careggi, Emergency Radiol Dept, Florence, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2025年
关键词
Breast; Breast neoplasms; Contrast media; Diagnostic techniques and procedures; Mammography; Neoplasm staging; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-025-02009-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of CEM in the preoperative staging of breast cancer in a large cohort of patients. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of preoperative staging CEM exams was conducted at our centre between June 2016 and June 2021. We evaluated cases where CEM influenced the type of surgery, necessitated additional biopsies or imaging, and identified additional lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and accuracy of CEM for the entire sample and each subgroup setting were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariate analysis were performed. Results 991 women, mean age 61.3 years old [35-93], with 1005 malignant lesions were included. CEM led to additional imaging in 36.7% (364/991) women and to additional biopsies in 18.5% (183/991) women. CEM altered the initial surgical plan based on conventional imaging in 226 out of 991 patients (22.8%). CEM had a sensitivity in the whole population of 91.5% (204/223), specificity of 96.8% (757/782), PPV of 89.1% (204/229), NPV of 97.5% (757/776) and an accuracy of 95.6% (961/1005); the AUC of the ROC curve was 0.941. We found CEM better performed in patients with a low BPE level compared with a high BPE level (rho = 0.028861). We see that the presence of additional lesions at CEM was the only significant predictor in the model. Conclusion This study reaffirms the high diagnostic accuracy of CEM for preoperative breast cancer staging in a large patient cohort.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: Large-scale single-center experience
    Bicchierai, Giulia
    Tonelli, Paolina
    Piacenti, Alba
    De Benedetto, Diego
    Boeri, Cecilia
    Vanzi, Ermanno
    Bianchi, Simonetta
    Cirone, Donatello
    Gill, Maninderpal Kaur
    Miele, Vittorio
    Nori, Jacopo
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (07): : 1276 - 1283
  • [2] Implementing the advantages of contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced breast MRI in breast cancer staging
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (01) : 160 - 162
  • [3] The performance of contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in local preoperative staging of invasive lobular breast cancer
    Lobbes, Marc B. I.
    Neeter, Lidewij M. F. H.
    Raat, Frank
    Turk, Kim
    Wildberger, Joachim E.
    van Nijnatten, Thiemo J. A.
    Nelemans, Patricia J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 164
  • [4] Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Capability to Distinguish Molecular Breast Cancer Subtypes
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Piegza, Tomasz
    Szpor, Joanna
    Heinze, Sylwia
    Popiela, Tadeusz
    Kargol, Jaromir
    Rudnicki, Wojciech
    BIOMEDICINES, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [5] Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions—a feasibility study
    Kristina Åhsberg
    Anna Gardfjell
    Emma Nimeus
    Rogvi Rasmussen
    Catharina Behmer
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Lisa Ryden
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [6] Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Breast Biopsy: Single-Center Experience
    Kornecki, Anat
    Bhaduri, Mousumi
    Khan, Nasir
    Ben Nachum, Ilanit
    Muscedere, Giulio
    Shmuilovich, Olga
    Lynn, Kalan
    Nano, Eni
    Blyth, Lily
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2023, 220 (06) : 826 - 827
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer
    Beauchemin, Noelle
    Zhu, Clara
    Hunter, Krystal
    Rosenthal, Adrienne
    Carter, Teralyn
    Lopez, Adrian
    Gruner, Ryan
    Yoon-Flannery, Kay
    Fantazzio, Michele
    Loveland-Jones, Catherine
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S321 - S322
  • [8] CONTRAST ENHANCED MAMMOGRAPHY (CEM) VS CONTRAST ENHANCED BREAST MRI AS A PREOPERATIVE STAGING EXAM IN WOMEN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED BREAST CANCER: A BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS
    Rane, A.
    Pohlman, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S29 - S29
  • [9] Pretreatment staging of breast cancer: Is contrast-enhanced digital mammography the solution?
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2024, 34 (02)
  • [10] Contrast-enhanced mammography in the evaluation of breast calcifications: preliminary experience
    Depretto, Catherine
    Borelli, Anna
    Liguori, Alessandro
    Presti, Gabriele
    Vingiani, Andrea
    Cartia, Francesco
    Ferranti, Claudio
    Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P.
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2020, 106 (06): : 491 - 496