Understanding the Privacy Practices of Political Campaigns: A Perspective from the 2020 US Election Websites

被引:0
|
作者
Kafle, Kaushal [1 ]
Mandal, Prianka [1 ]
Singh, Kapil [3 ]
Andow, Benjamin [2 ]
Nadkarni, Adwait [1 ]
机构
[1] William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185 USA
[2] Google, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[3] IBM TJ Watson Res Ctr, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/SP54263.2024.00091
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Political campaigns are known to collect private user data, whether for building voter profiles, engaging with volunteers, or for soliciting donations. However, as such campaigns are classified as nonprofit in the United States (U.S.), their privacy practices have not received the same level of scrutiny as those of for-profit enterprises. This paper presents the Polityzer framework to evaluate the privacy posture of political campaign websites, and uses it to analyze 2060 campaign websites active during the U.S. election of November 2020. Our analysis leads to 20 key findings that demonstrate gaps in the privacy postures of political campaigns. For instance, we find that campaigns collect extensive private data they are not required to by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), and a vast majority do not provide any form of privacy disclosure. When disclosures are provided, they are often incomplete. We also found that campaigns may be inadvertently sharing data with other campaigns through common fundraising platforms, without disclosing such sharing. Reporting the lack of privacy disclosure to the respective campaigns yields further insights into the rationale behind their security posture. Finally, we discuss ways in which our results could enable future research, inform emerging privacy regulations, and transform user behavior regarding data privacy in this critical context.
引用
收藏
页码:3404 / 3422
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election
    Moore, Ryan C. C.
    Dahlke, Ross
    Hancock, Jeffrey T. T.
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 7 (07) : 1096 - +
  • [2] Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election
    Ryan C. Moore
    Ross Dahlke
    Jeffrey T. Hancock
    Nature Human Behaviour, 2023, 7 : 1096 - 1105
  • [3] Political connections and corporate debt: Evidence from two US election campaigns
    Chkir, Imed
    Gallali, Mohamed Imen
    Toukabri, Manara
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 75 : 229 - 239
  • [4] When and Why Are Campaigns' Persuasive Effects Small? Evidence from the 2020 US Presidential Election
    Broockman, David E.
    Kalla, Joshua L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 67 (04) : 833 - 849
  • [5] Still the middle way - A study of political communication practices in Swedish election campaigns
    Nord, LW
    HARVARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2006, 11 (01): : 64 - 76
  • [6] Pioneers of political marketing (The early use of television in US presidential election campaigns)
    Maarek, PJ
    HISTOIRE, 2000, : 36 - 36
  • [7] Does the Political Context Shape How "Due Impartiality" is Interpreted? An Analysis of BBC Reporting of the 2019 UK and 2020 US Election Campaigns
    Hughes, Ceri
    Morani, Marina
    Cushion, Stephen
    Kyriakidou, Maria
    JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2023, 24 (14) : 1715 - 1733
  • [8] A POLITICAL MARKETING PERSPECTIVE ON SOCIAL MEDIA ADOPTION BY US CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGNS
    Williams, Christine B.
    Gulati, Girish J. Jeff
    IDEAS IN MARKETING: FINDING THE NEW AND POLISHING THE OLD, 2015, : 274 - 281
  • [9] A Data-Centric Approach to Understanding the 2020 US Presidential Election
    Srinivasan, Satish Mahadevan
    Paat, Yok-Fong
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2024, 8 (09)
  • [10] Health and Election Outcomes: Evidence from the 2020 US Presidential Election
    Panagopoulos, Costas
    Weinschenk, Aaron C.
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2023, 76 (02) : 712 - 724