Field inversion and machine learning based on the Rubber-Band Spalart-Allmaras Model

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Chenyu [1 ]
Zhang, Yufei [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Aerosp Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Turbulence modeling; Field inversion; Constrained-recalibration; Machine learning; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.taml.2024.100564
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as powerful tools for improving the predictive capabilities of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models in separated flows. This improvement is achieved by leveraging complex ML models, such as those developed using field inversion and machine learning (FIML), to dynamically adjust the constants within the baseline RANS model. However, the ML models often overlook the fundamental calibrations of the RANS turbulence model. Consequently, the basic calibration of the baseline RANS model is disrupted, leading to a degradation in the accuracy, particularly in basic wall-attached flows outside of the training set. To address this issue, a modified version of the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model, known as Rubber-band SA (RBSA), has been proposed recently. This modification involves identifying and embedding constraints related to basic wall-attached flows directly into the model. It is shown that no matter how the parameters of the RBSA model are adjusted as constants throughout the flow field, its accuracy in wall-attached flows remains unaffected. In this paper, we propose a new constraint for the RBSA model, which better safeguards the law of wall in extreme conditions where the model parameter is adjusted dramatically. The resultant model is called the RBSA-poly model. We then show that when combined with FIML augmentation, the RBSA-poly model effectively preserves the accuracy of simple wall-attached flows, even when the adjusted parameters become functions of local flow variables rather than constants. A comparative analysis with the FIML-augmented original SA model reveals that the augmented RBSA-poly model reduces error in basic wall-attached flows by 50 % while maintaining comparable accuracy in trained separated flows. These findings confirm the effectiveness of utilizing FIML in conjunction with the RBSA model, offering superior accuracy retention in cardinal flows.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A field inversion and symbolic regression enhanced Spalart-Allmaras model for airfoil stall prediction
    He, Zizhou
    Wu, Chenyu
    Zhang, Yufei
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (06)
  • [2] Replicating transition with modified Spalart-Allmaras model
    Rahman, M. M.
    Zhu, Hongqian
    Hasan, K.
    Chen, Sheng
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2024, 221 : 570 - 588
  • [3] Functional Correction to Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model using Field Inversion and Data Mining: A Novel Approach
    Safdar, Muhammad Muneeb
    Anand, Apurva
    Baeder, James D.
    AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024, 2024,
  • [4] Topology optimization for turbulent flow with Spalart-Allmaras model
    Yoon, Gil Ho
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 303 : 288 - 311
  • [5] On the Characteristic Length Scale for the Synthetic Turbulence Based on the Spalart-Allmaras Model
    Guo, Qilong
    Liu, Pengxin
    Li, Chen
    Sun, Dong
    Yuan, Xianxu
    ADVANCES IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS, 2024, 16 (01) : 122 - 145
  • [6] Data-Enabled Recalibration of the Spalart-Allmaras Model
    Bin, Yuanwei
    Huang, George
    Yang, Xiang I. A.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2023, 61 (11) : 4852 - 4863
  • [7] Transition prediction based on amplification factor and Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model
    Shi, Ya-Yun
    Bai, Jun-Qiang
    Hua, Jun
    Yang, Ti-Hao
    Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30 (07): : 1670 - 1677
  • [8] An Automatic Wall Treatment for Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model
    Assam, Ashwani
    Kalkote, Nikhil Narayan
    Sharma, Vatsalya
    Eswaran, Vinayak
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (06):
  • [9] Continuous Adjoint Approach for the Spalart-Allmaras Model in Aerodynamic Optimization
    Bueno-Orovio, Alfonso
    Castro, Carlos
    Palacios, Francisco
    Zuazua, Enrique
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2012, 50 (03) : 631 - 646
  • [10] Exploring the validity of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model for hypersonic flows
    Paciorri, R
    Dieudonne, W
    Degrez, G
    Charbonnier, JM
    Deconinck, H
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1998, 35 (02) : 121 - 126