MALT QUALITY PARAMETERS OF DIFFERENT BARLEY VARIETIES

被引:0
|
作者
Vasilescu, Liliana [1 ]
Sirbu, Alexandrina [2 ]
Psota, Vratislav [3 ]
Petcu, Eugen [1 ]
Vasilescu, Silviu [1 ]
Cana, Lidia [1 ]
Epure, Lenuta Iuliana [4 ]
Toader, Maria [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Agr Res & Dev Inst Fundulea, 1 N Titulescu St, Fundulea, Romania
[2] Constantin Brancoveanu Univ Pitesti, FMMAE Ramnicu Valcea, 39 Nicolae Balcescu Blvd, Rm Valcea, Romania
[3] Res Inst Brewing & Malting, Mostecka 971-7, Brno 61400, Czech Republic
[4] Univ Agron Sci & Vet Med Bucharest, 59 Marasti Blvd,Dist 1, Bucharest, Romania
来源
SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY | 2024年 / 67卷 / 02期
关键词
barley; variety; quality indices; malt;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The study presents the technological malt quality of the facultative six-row barley variety Smarald, winter six-row barley Ametist and Simbol varieties, and winter two-row barley Artemis and Wintmalt varieties. The Romanian genotypes were compared with one of the best varieties recommended for malt and beer in the Czech Republic, the winter two-row barley genotype Wintmalt. In the studied barley varieties, the protein content ranged between 9.3-12.5% and all the varieties (except the two-row Artemis variety) registered a starch content over the standard (60.0%). Regarding the extract, just one variety had a value of over 80% (six-row Smarald variety) with the highest malt extract, followed by Simbol and Wintmalt varieties (79.9% and 79.4% respectively). The values of diastatic power ranged from 189 0WK (Simbol variety) to 419 (WK)-W-0 (Wintmalt variety). The apparent final attenuation moved from 77.9 to 81.2 % in all varieties, the lowest value was registered by the Artemis barley variety. All the studied genotypes have presented an increased beta-glucan content (479-1610 mg/l), except the Wintmalt variety which registered the lowest level of this quality index (216 mg/l).
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 466
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPORTANCE OF BARLEY VARIETIES FOR MALT AND BEER QUALITY
    SCHILDBACH, R
    BRAUWISSENSCHAFT, 1980, 33 (05): : 113 - 118
  • [2] ANTIRADICAL ACTIVITY OF DIFFERENT BARLEY VARIETIES AND MALT TYPES
    Dabina-Bicka, Ilona
    Karklina, Daina
    Kruma, Zanda
    RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2011, VOL 1, 2011, : 87 - 92
  • [3] The effect of fungicidal treatment on selected quality parameters of barley and malt
    Havlová, P
    Lancová, K
    Vánová, M
    Havel, J
    Hajslová, J
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2006, 54 (04) : 1353 - 1360
  • [4] Technological Quality of New Croatian Barley Varieties Intended for Whisky Malt Production
    Habschied, Kristina
    August, Hrvoje
    Mastanjevic, Kresimir
    Simic, Gordana
    Lalic, Alojzije
    Krstanovic, Vinko
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN NUTRITION AND FOOD SCIENCE, 2019, 7 (03) : 783 - 790
  • [5] Malt milling energy and qualitative parameters of barley malt
    Vejrazka, K.
    Psota, V.
    Ehrenbergerova, J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS FLOUR - BREAD '05 AND 5TH CROATIAN CONGRESS OF CEREAL TECHNOLOGISTS, 2006, : 240 - +
  • [6] MALT QUALITIES OF SPRING BARLEYS DESCRIBES IN BARLEY VARIETIES
    WEITH, L
    MONATSSCHRIFT FUR BRAUEREI, 1978, 31 (08): : 262 - 266
  • [7] BARLEY AND MALT TANNINOGENS AND BEER QUALITY
    DADIC, M
    VANGHELU.GE
    VALYI, Z
    JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF BREWING, 1974, 80 (06) : 558 - 564
  • [8] A comparison of barley malt quality measurements and malt sugar concentrations
    Duke, Stanley H.
    Henson, Cynthia A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BREWING CHEMISTS, 2008, 66 (03) : 151 - 161
  • [9] A Comparison of Barley Malt Osmolyte Concentrations and Standard Malt Quality Measurements as Indicators of Barley Malt Amylolytic Enzyme Activities
    Duke, Stanley H.
    Henson, Cynthia A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BREWING CHEMISTS, 2009, 67 (04) : 206 - 216
  • [10] The genotypic difference in the effect of water stress after anthesis on the malt quality parameters in barley
    Wu, X. J.
    Chen, X.
    Zeng, F. R.
    Zhang, G. P.
    JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2015, 65 : 209 - 214