Awareness, use and perception of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - a national cross-sectional survey among patients with a cancer diagnosis and healthcare providers

被引:1
|
作者
Bloedt, S. [1 ]
Erstling, S. [1 ]
Becker, M. [2 ]
Carl, G. [3 ]
Follmann, M. [4 ]
Frenz, S. [5 ]
Holmberg, C. [6 ]
Langer, T. [4 ]
Pachanov, A. [7 ,8 ]
Pieper, D. [2 ,7 ,8 ]
Nothacker, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ, Inst Med Knowledge Management IMWi, AWMF Assoc Sci Med Soc Germany, Marburg, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Inst Res Operat Med IFOM, Cologne, Germany
[3] German Prostate Canc Support Grp, Bonn, Germany
[4] German Canc Soc, Off German Guideline Program Oncol GGPO, Berlin, Germany
[5] Womens Selfhelp Assoc Canc, Bonn, Germany
[6] Brandenburg Med Sch Theodor Fontane, Inst Social Med & Epidemiol, Brandenburg, Germany
[7] Inst Hlth Serv & Hlth Syst Res, Fac Hlth Sci Brandenburg, Brandenburg Med Sch Theodor Fontane, Rudersdorf, Germany
[8] Brandenburg Med Sch Theodor Fontane, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Rudersdorf, Germany
关键词
Clinical practice guidelines; Patient version; Oncology; Cancer; Healthcare providers; Self-help organisations; Formats; Dissemination; Implementation;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-11563-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundTo investigate awareness, use, and perceptions of the patient guidelines (PGs) of the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO) and to explore general preferences regarding cancer information among patients and healthcare providers (HCPs).MethodsTwo cross-sectional surveys among patients with cancer (November 2020-May 2021) and among HCPs (April -June 2021) were set up as anonymised, self-administered, semi-structured online surveys, including open-ended questions. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. Patients were recruited from national self-help organisations and certified cancer centres located all over Germany. HCPs were recruited from cancer centres, scientific medical societies and guideline groups.ResultsOf 816 participating patients, 45% were aware of the GGPO-PGs, while 55% of the 455 participating HCPs were aware of them. Of those aware of the GGPO-PGs, 65% of patients and 86% of HCPs perceived them as helpful, while 95% in both groups saw them as comprehensive. Seventy-five percent of patients and 85% of HCPs were satisfied with the GGPO-PGs, 22%/13% were partially satisfied, and 3%/2% were rather/not at all satisfied. In addition to self-help organisations, physicians and hospitals were perceived as central in distributing the GGPO-PGs. More patients (78%) than HCPs (56%) stated a preference for detailed information, although the wish for concise information - e.g. decision aids - was concurrently expressed by the majority of all participants. Thematic analysis showed that up-to-dateness, trustworthiness, and supportive messaging are important properties for PGs.ConclusionsHCPs found the GGPO-PGs helpful, but awareness was low, which suggests that dissemination should be improved. This is also true for patients; however, further research needs to be done to increase the helpfulness of PGs for patients. Oncological PGs seem to be needed in different formats according to patients' situational needs. Theory-driven research should investigate how to best frame patient information in a supportive way.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping the awareness and knowledge about patient and public versions of guidelines among stakeholders in China: a cross-sectional survey
    Liu, Hui
    Yao, Yuanyuan
    Luo, Xufei
    Yang, Nan
    Wang, Zijun
    Shen, Xiping
    Li, Zhewei
    Zhao, Wei
    Peng, Dongrui
    Zhang, Huayu
    He, Hongfeng
    Wang, Wei
    Liu, Xingrong
    Chen, Yaolong
    Estill, Janne
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 173
  • [2] Understanding Awareness of Patient Rights: A Cross-sectional Survey among Healthcare Workers, Patients, and Attendees
    Kumar, Arjun
    Janmeja, Ashok K.
    Singh, Balbir
    Monika
    Chandna, Nancy
    Manchanda, Rohit
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY CARE, 2024, 13 (02) : 91 - 94
  • [3] Acupuncture in practice: mapping the providers, the patients and the settings in a national cross-sectional survey
    Hopton, A. K.
    Curnoe, S.
    Kanaan, M.
    MacPherson, H.
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (01):
  • [4] Use of tongue base palpation among oral healthcare providers: Cross-sectional survey
    Nieves-Rivera, Angelica
    Benchetrit, Liliya
    Kan, Krystal
    Tucker, Steven
    Johnson, Michael
    Edwards, Heather
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 44 (02)
  • [5] Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients
    Fritsch, Sebastian J.
    Blankenheim, Andrea
    Wahl, Alina
    Hetfeld, Petra
    Maassen, Oliver
    Deffge, Saskia
    Kunze, Julian
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Riedel, Morris
    Marx, Gernot
    Bickenbach, Johannes
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 8
  • [6] Evidence based practice among healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study
    Kalavani, Khalil
    Mohebbifar, Rafat
    Rafiei, Sima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 32 (05) : 867 - 878
  • [7] Patients' sense of responsibility to healthcare providers and its predictors: A national cross-sectional survey in China
    Ye, Beizhu
    Wang, Xinzi
    Wang, Fang
    Zhang, Ping
    Cheng, Yao
    Sun, Yi
    Jiang, Hongwei
    Qin, Hua
    Liu, Aiguo
    Liu, Yang
    Zhu, Xi
    Zhang, Naixing
    Liang, Yuan
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [8] KNOWLEDGE, AWARENESS AND PRACTICE OF NEEDLE STICK AND SHARPS INJURIES AMONG HEALTHCARE SERVICE PROVIDERS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Abdulrahman, A. Al Johani
    Karuppiah, Karmegam
    Alya, O. Al Mutairi
    Al Nozha, Omar M.
    Mani, Kulanthayan K. C.
    Sambasivam, Sivasankar
    JP JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2016, 13 (02) : 209 - 222
  • [9] Use, applicability, and dissemination of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines in oncology in Germany: a qualitative interview study with healthcare providers
    Wahlen, Sarah
    Breuing, Jessica
    Becker, Monika
    Buehn, Stefanie
    Hauprich, Julia
    Koensgen, Nadja
    Meyer, Nora
    Bloedt, Susanne
    Carl, Guenther
    Follmann, Markus
    Frenz, Stefanie
    Langer, Thomas
    Nothacker, Monika
    Schaefer, Corinna
    Pieper, Dawid
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [10] Use, applicability, and dissemination of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines in oncology in Germany: a qualitative interview study with healthcare providers
    Sarah Wahlen
    Jessica Breuing
    Monika Becker
    Stefanie Bühn
    Julia Hauprich
    Nadja Könsgen
    Nora Meyer
    Susanne Blödt
    Günther Carl
    Markus Follmann
    Stefanie Frenz
    Thomas Langer
    Monika Nothacker
    Corinna Schaefer
    Dawid Pieper
    BMC Health Services Research, 24