Hypothesized pharmacogenomic and medication influences on tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol metabolism in a cohort of unselected oral cannabis users

被引:0
|
作者
Wright, Jessica A. [1 ]
Huang, Linda [1 ]
Katamesh, Basant E. [2 ]
Yadav, Siddhant [2 ]
Singla, Abhinav [2 ]
Vincent, Ann [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med & Sci, Pharm Serv, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Coll Med & Sci, Div Gen Internal Med, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Pharmacogenomics; Potential drug-gene interactions; CBD; THC; CYP450; enzyme; Pharmacology; Cannabinoid levels;
D O I
10.1186/s42238-024-00256-6
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundDifferences in cannabinoid metabolism and patient responses can arise even with equivalent doses and formulations. Genetic polymorphisms in genes responsible for cannabinoid metabolism and medications that alter CYP450 pathways responsible for metabolism of cannabinoids may account for some of this variability.Materials and methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on a cohort of unselected patients who had previously completed pharmacogenomic testing and reported oral cannabis use, as defined as "oral" or "by mouth" route of administration. The objective was to identify atypical variants and medications in this cohort and formulate a hypothesis on how these variables influence the metabolism of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD).ResultsOral cannabis use was confirmed in 71 patients, with an average age of 68.5 years, and primarily white women. Of the 71 patients, 10 had no atypical variants; 31 had atypical variants in CYP2C9; 37 had atypical variants in CYP2C19; 6 had atypical variants in CYP3A4; and 15 had atypical variants in CYP3A5. Of the 71 patients, 5 were taking medications that could interact with THC, and 8 were taking medications that could interact with CBD.ConclusionThe results this study reveal the spectrum of hypothesized alterations in THC and CBD metabolism due to atypical genetic variants and medications. The absence of published clinical outcomes in this field renders it challenging to estimate clinical significance of these findings. Until such data become available, clinicians should remain aware of the possibility that atypical variants and medications may impact patients' responses to THC and CBD.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Pharmacodynamic effects of vaporized and oral cannabidiol (CBD) and vaporized CBD-dominant cannabis in infrequent cannabis users
    Spindle, Tory R.
    Cone, Edward J.
    Goffi, Elia
    Weerts, Elise M.
    Mitchell, John M.
    Winecker, Ruth E.
    Bigelow, George E.
    Flegel, Ronald R.
    Vandrey, Ryan
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2020, 211
  • [2] A randomised controlled trial of vaporised Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol alone and in combination in frequent and infrequent cannabis users: acute intoxication effects
    Solowij, Nadia
    Broyd, Samantha
    Greenwood, Lisa-marie
    van Hell, Hendrika
    Martelozzo, Dave
    Rueb, Kuna
    Todd, Juanita
    Liu, Zheng
    Galettis, Peter
    Martin, Jennifer
    Murray, Robin
    Jones, Alison
    Michie, Patricia T.
    Croft, Rodney
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 269 (01) : 17 - 35
  • [3] A randomised controlled trial of vaporised Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol alone and in combination in frequent and infrequent cannabis users: acute intoxication effects
    Nadia Solowij
    Samantha Broyd
    Lisa-marie Greenwood
    Hendrika van Hell
    Dave Martelozzo
    Kuna Rueb
    Juanita Todd
    Zheng Liu
    Peter Galettis
    Jennifer Martin
    Robin Murray
    Alison Jones
    Patricia T. Michie
    Rodney Croft
    European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2019, 269 : 17 - 35
  • [4] Differences in Inhibitory Control and Resting Brain Metabolism between Older Chronic Users of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or Cannabidiol (CBD)-A Pilot Study
    Rudroff, Thorsten
    Workman, Craig D.
    Gander, Phillip E.
    Deters, Justin R.
    Ponto, Laura L. Boles
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (07)
  • [5] Cognitive and subjective dose-response effects of acute oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in infrequent cannabis users
    Curran, HV
    Brignell, C
    Fletcher, S
    Middleton, P
    Henry, J
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 164 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [6] Cognitive and subjective dose-response effects of acute oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in infrequent cannabis users
    Valerie H. Curran
    Catherine Brignell
    Sally Fletcher
    Paul Middleton
    John Henry
    Psychopharmacology, 2002, 164 : 61 - 70
  • [7] TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC INTRACTABLE EPILEPSY WITH VAPORIZED CANNABIDIOL (CBD) AND Δ9-TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL (THC)-PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF THE ISRAELI PEDIATRIC MEDICAL CANNABIS (MC) COHORT
    Linder, I
    Tzadok, M.
    Menascu, S.
    Ben-Zeev, B.
    Lerman-Sagie, T.
    Kramer, U.
    EPILEPSIA, 2016, 57 : 108 - 108
  • [8] Acute effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and their combination on facial emotion recognition: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in cannabis users
    Hindocha, Chandni
    Freeman, Tom P.
    Schafer, Grainne
    Gardener, Chelsea
    Das, Ravi K.
    Morgan, Celia J. A.
    Curran, H. Valerie
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 25 (03) : 325 - 334
  • [9] Urinary Pharmacokinetic Profile of Cannabidiol (CBD), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Their Metabolites following Oral and Vaporized CBD and Vaporized CBD-Dominant Cannabis Administration
    Sholler, Dennis J.
    Spindle, Tory R.
    Cone, Edward J.
    Goffi, Elia
    Kuntz, David
    Mitchell, John M.
    Winecker, Ruth E.
    Bigelow, George E.
    Flegel, Ronald R.
    Vandrey, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 46 (05) : 494 - 503
  • [10] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study about the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on the pharmacokinetics of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) after oral application of THC verses standardized cannabis extract
    Nadulski, T
    Pragst, F
    Weinberg, G
    Roser, P
    Schnelle, M
    Fronk, EM
    Stadelmann, AM
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2005, 27 (06) : 799 - 810