Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of KOOS-ACL questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Buyukluoglu, Gokhan [1 ]
Orscelik, Aydan [1 ]
Kiyak, Gorkem [2 ]
Ercan, Sabriye [2 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Sports Med, Gulhane Med Fac, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Sports Med, Fac Med, Isparta, Turkiye
来源
关键词
KOOS-ACL; Turkish; Reliability; Validity; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; RECONSTRUCTION; PREVENTION; RUPTURE;
D O I
10.1186/s13102-024-01036-8
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background This study aimed to adapt the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score- Anterior Cruciate Ligament (KOOS-ACL) into Turkish and to assess its validity and reliability. Methods The adaptation process involved translation, back-translation, and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire. Totally 133 patients who had a diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tear was recruited. The reliability of the Turkish version of the KOOS-ACL was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-total correlations, and ICC. EFA and CFA were performed to evaluate construct validity, supported by KMO and Bartlett's test results. Criterion validity was examined through correlations with IKDC scores, and discriminative power was assessed using an independent samples t-test. Results IKDC score for evaluating knee function was 59.84 +/- 21.74. The composite KOOS-ACL-Tr score was 61.95 +/- 25.19. Cronbach's Alpha value was found to be 0.952 demonstrating high reliability. KOOS-ACL-Tr scores showed a linear positive correlation with the time elapsed since injury and IKDC scores (p < 0.001) establishing concurrent validity. Conclusions The adapted Turkish version of the KOOS-ACL is a valid and reliable scale intended for use in monitoring patients with ACL injuries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and Preliminary Validation of the KOOS-ACL: A Short Form Version of the KOOS for Young Active Patients With ACL Tears
    Marmura, Hana
    Tremblay, Paul F.
    Getgood, Alan M. J.
    Bryant, Dianne M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (06): : 1447 - 1456
  • [2] The Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Study Process Questionnaire
    Yilmaz, M. Betul
    Orhan, Feza
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2011, 36 (159): : 69 - 83
  • [3] TURKISH VERSION OF BODY AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY
    Karaca, Seda
    Bayar, Banu
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2021, 32 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [4] The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the health Behavior questionnaire
    Siyez, Digdem Muege
    Bas, Asli Uz
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 7 (26): : 188 - 198
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis subscale of the KOOS
    Olmez, Sevim Beyza
    Maras, Gokhan
    Ulucakoy, Coskun
    Basar, Selda
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 40 (12) : 2935 - 2942
  • [6] Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of the remission from depression questionnaire
    Kart, Aysegul
    Zamki, Erkut
    Orsel, Sibel
    Turkcapar, Hakan
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 354 - 360
  • [7] Athlete Sleep Behavior Questionnaire - Turkish Version: Study of Validity and Reliability
    Darendeli, Abdulkerim
    Diker, Gurkan
    Cinar, Ziynet
    JOURNAL OF TURKISH SLEEP MEDICINE-TURK UYKU TIBBI DERGISI, 2019, 6 (02): : 43 - 48
  • [8] Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Hand20 questionnaire
    Tore, Nurten Gizem
    Oskay, Deran
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 49 (04) : 1243 - 1248
  • [9] Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of the chronic liver disease questionnaire
    Celik, F.
    Bektas, H.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 : S366 - S366
  • [10] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of breathlessness beliefs questionnaire
    Gurses, Hulya Nilgun
    Saka, Seda
    Zeren, Melih
    Bayram, Mehmet
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (04) : 834 - 839