Comparative efficacy of probiotic mixture Bifidobacterium longum KABP042 plus Pediococcus pentosaceus KABP041 vs. Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 in the management of infant colic: a randomized clinical trial

We aimed to compare the efficacy of Bifidobacterium longum KABP042 + Pediococcus pentosaceus KABP041 (BL + PP) vs. Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM17938 (LR) in alleviating the symptoms of infant colic, as commercially available formulations. A randomized, multicenter, parallel, single-blind (investigator) trial was conducted in 112 colicky infants diagnosed as per Rome IV criteria and randomly allocated to receive BL + PP orally (109 colony-forming units [CFU]/day, n = 55) or LR (108 CFU/day, n = 57) for 21 days. Primary study outcomes were percentage of responders (>= 50% reduction in crying and fussing time from baseline, as reported by parents in a structured diary) and daily crying and fussing time (minutes/day) on days 7, 14, and 21 after randomization. Study groups were comparable at baseline. Responder rate was significantly higher in BP + PP group vs. LR group at days 7 (61.1% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.013) and 14 (84.6% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.004). Crying and fussing time (median [IQR]) became significantly lower in BL + PP group vs. LR group on day 7 (119 [60-210] vs. 180 [110-270]; p = 0.028), day 14 (60.0 [30-105] vs. 120 [60-180]; p = 0.017), and day 21 (29 [0-85] vs. 67 [30-165]; p = 0.011). No significant differences were found in the number of adverse events between the groups. Conclusion: The specific formulation of B. longum KABP042 and P. pentosaceus KABP041 achieved a higher response rate and a larger reduction in crying and fussing time in colicky infants. Both probiotic interventions were well tolerated.