Value of clinical review for AI-guided deep vein thrombosis diagnosis with ultrasound imaging by non-expert operators

被引:0
|
作者
Speranza, Giancarlo [1 ]
Mischkewitz, Sven [2 ]
Al-Noor, Fouad [3 ]
Kainz, Bernhard [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Hlth, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] ThinkSono GmbH, Potsdam, Germany
[3] ThinkSono Ltd, London, England
[4] FAU Erlangen Nurnberg, Nurnberg, Germany
[5] Imperial Coll London, Dept Comp, London, England
来源
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE | 2025年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
COMPRESSION ULTRASOUND; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1038/s41746-025-01518-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) carries high morbidity, mortality, and costs globally. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) image acquisition by non-ultrasound-trained providers, supported by an AI-based guidance and remote image review system, is believed to improve the timeliness and cost-effectiveness of diagnosis. We examine a database of 381 patients with suspected DVT who underwent an AI-guided ultrasound scan by a non-ultrasound-trained nurse and an expert sonographer-performed standard compression ultrasound scan. Each AI-guided scan was reviewed remotely by blinded radiologists or blinded independent POCUS-certified American Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians. Remote reviewer and standard scan diagnoses were compared. The primary endpoint is AI-guidance system sensitivity with clinician review; secondary endpoints include specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, image quality, inter-observer image quality, and vein compressibility agreement. Data was analysed through the bootstrapping method, bootstrapping with a second reader for each scan, and a majority voting system. Eighty percent (n = 304) of scans were of sufficient diagnostic quality. Radiologist reviewer sensitivity ranged from 90%-95%, specificity from 74%-84%, NPV from 98%-99%, PPV from 30%-42%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 39%-50%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.15 and for compressibility 0.61. EM reviewer sensitivity ranged from 95%-98%, specificity from 97%-100%, NPV was 99%, PPV from 81%-100%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 29%-38%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.59 and for compressibility 0.67. Diagnosing lower extremity DVT through AI-guided image acquisition with clinician review is feasible. Performance is influenced by reviewer expertise. We find potential positive impacts on health economics, including safely avoiding expert-led ultrasound scans.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] VALUE OF DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS
    SHANIK, DG
    MACERLEAN, DP
    KEAVENY, TV
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1977, 146 (04) : 97 - 99
  • [2] Predictive value of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis
    Criado, E
    Burnham, CB
    SURGERY, 1997, 122 (03) : 578 - 583
  • [3] Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning
    Bernhard Kainz
    Mattias P. Heinrich
    Antonios Makropoulos
    Jonas Oppenheimer
    Ramin Mandegaran
    Shrinivasan Sankar
    Christopher Deane
    Sven Mischkewitz
    Fouad Al-Noor
    Andrew C. Rawdin
    Andreas Ruttloff
    Matthew D. Stevenson
    Peter Klein-Weigel
    Nicola Curry
    npj Digital Medicine, 4
  • [4] Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis from ultrasound imaging with machine learning
    Kainz, Bernhard
    Makropoulos, Antonios
    Oppenheimer, Jonas
    Deane, Christopher
    Mischkewitz, Sven
    Al-Noor, Fouad
    Rawdin, Andrew C.
    Stevenson, Matthew D.
    Mandegaran, Ramin
    Heinrich, Mattias P.
    Curry, Nicola
    Sankar, Shrinivasan
    Ruttloff, Andreas
    Klein-Weigel, Peter
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [5] ULTRASOUND AND CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS OF THE LEG
    KIIL, J
    MOLLER, JC
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA-DIAGNOSIS, 1979, 20 (02): : 292 - 298
  • [6] VALUE OF DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN DIAGNOSIS OF CLINICALLY SUSPECTED DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS
    MEADWAY, J
    NICOLAIDES, AN
    WALKER, CJ
    OCONNELL, JD
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 4 (5996): : 552 - 554
  • [7] VALUE OF DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN PATIENTS WITH A CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS
    MEADWAY, J
    NICOLAIDES, AN
    THROMBOSIS ET DIATHESIS HAEMORRHAGICA, 1975, 34 (02): : 563 - 564
  • [8] Value of ultrasound imaging of the lower limbs for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department
    Campo Linares, Ricardo
    Sanz Cortes, Juan
    Morales Cano, Jose Manuel
    Gomez San Roman, Teresa
    EMERGENCIAS, 2009, 21 (03): : 177 - 182
  • [9] VALUE OF REAL-TIME B-MODE ULTRASOUND IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS OF THE LOWER-LIMBS
    ELIAS, A
    LECORFF, G
    BOUVIER, JL
    BENICHOU, M
    SERRADIMIGNI, A
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 1987, 6 (02) : 175 - 182
  • [10] DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS - REVIEW OF CLINICAL-EVALUATION AND IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY
    WHEELER, HB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 150 (04): : 7 - 13