Carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions of different rice-based cropping systems using LCA

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammad Mofizur Rahman Jahangir [1 ]
Eduardo Aguilera [6 ]
Jannatul Ferdous [2 ]
Farah Mahjabin [1 ]
Abdullah Al Asif [1 ]
Moutakin Hossan [1 ]
Hassan Ahmad [1 ]
Maximilian Bauer [3 ]
Alberto Sanz Cobeña [4 ]
Christoph Müller [2 ]
Mohammad Zaman [5 ]
机构
[1] Bangladesh Agricultural University,Department of Soil Science
[2] Spanish National Research Council,Institute of Economy, Geography and Demography
[3] Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food & Agriculture,Soil and Water Management & Crop Nutrition
[4] Leibniz Universität Hannover,Department of Chemistry
[5] Justus-Liebig University Giessen,Institute of Plant Ecology (IFZ)
[6] Justus Liebig University,Liebig Centre for Agroecology and Climate Impact Research
[7] University College Dublin,School of Biology and Environmental Science and Earth Institute
关键词
Carbon footprint; Co-designed Carbon footprint calculation tools; Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions; Major cropping patterns;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-90157-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are many cropping systems on floodplain soils, but greenhouse gas (GHG) emission balances of these agricultural systems are rarely reported. Carbon (C) footprints of agricultural products were assessed using a co-designed life cycle assessment tool in major cropping systems in Bangladesh: rice-rice-rice (R-R-R/boro-aus-aman), rice-fallow-rice (R-F-R/boro-fallow-aman), maize-fallow-rice (M-F-R), wheat-mungbean-rice (W-Mu-R), and potato-rice-fallow (P-R-F) along with the field measurement of some of the systems. The rice system with dryland crops had higher nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (3.8 in maize, 4.5 in potato and 0.92 kg N2O–N ha−1 in mungbean) than sole rice (0.73 in boro, 0.57 in aus and 1.94 kg N2O–N ha−1 in aman) systems but methane (CH4) emissions exhibited the opposite. Methane dominated, accounting for 50–80% of total emissions in rice systems. The boro rice-based systems (R-R-R and R-F-R) had the highest C footprint (ca. 25.8 and 19.2 Mg CO2e ha−1) while the P-F-R (12.3 Mg CO2e ha−1) and M-F-R (12.6 Mg CO2e ha−1) had the lowest C footprint. Boro and aus were more suitable to reduce C footprint. Measured CH4 and N2O data agreed well with the IPCC Tier 1 estimates but further study on GHG measurements in other agroecosystems and cropping systems are required to validate the estimation for adopting suitable GHG mitigation strategies.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Carbon Footprint, and Grain Yields of Rice-Based Cropping Systems in Eastern China
    Hu, Zhongze
    Liu, Hongjiang
    Zhang, Yuefang
    Chen, Ji
    Wang, Xian
    Yang, Daliu
    Sheng, Jing
    Chen, Liugen
    Zheng, Jianchu
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [2] Integrated Effects of Straw Incorporation and N Application on Rice Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Three Rice-Based Cropping Systems
    Bankole, Oluwaseyi Oyewale
    Danso, Frederick
    Zhang, Nan
    Zhang, Jun
    Zhang, Kun
    Dong, Wenjun
    Lu, Changying
    Zhang, Xin
    Li, Gexing
    Raheem, Abdulkareem
    Deng, Aixing
    Zheng, Chengyan
    Song, Zhenwei
    Zhang, Weijian
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [3] Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint of cucumber, tomato and lettuce production using two cropping systems
    Pereira, Breno de Jesus
    Cecilio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
    La Scala Jr, Newton
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 282
  • [4] A comparison of methods to quantify greenhouse gas emissions of cropping systems in LCA
    Goglio, R.
    Smith, W. N.
    Grant, B. B.
    Desjardins, R. L.
    Gao, X.
    Hanis, K.
    Tenuta, M.
    Campbell, C. A.
    McConkey, B. G.
    Nemecek, T.
    Burgess, P. J.
    Williams, A. G.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 4010 - 4017
  • [5] Plough Tillage Maintains High Rice Yield and Lowers Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Straw Incorporation in Three Rice-Based Cropping Systems
    Danso, Frederick
    Bankole, Oluwaseyi Oyewale
    Zhang, Nan
    Dong, Wenjun
    Zhang, Kun
    Lu, Changying
    Shang, Ziyin
    Li, Gexing
    Deng, Aixing
    Song, Zhenwei
    Zheng, Chengyan
    Zhang, Jun
    Zhang, Weijian
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [6] Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from rice-based production systems: Sensitivity and upscaling
    Li, CS
    Mosier, A
    Wassmann, R
    Cai, ZC
    Zheng, XH
    Huang, Y
    Tsuruta, H
    Boonjawat, J
    Lantin, R
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2004, 18 (01)
  • [7] Carbon sequestration potential of rice-based cropping systems under different tillage practices
    Rao, Karnena K.
    Samal, Saubhagya K.
    Kumar, Manoj
    Naik, Sushanta K.
    Bhatt, Bhagwati P.
    Prakash, Ved
    Mondal, Surajit
    Choubey, Anup K.
    Dalal, Ram C.
    Mishra, Janki S.
    Kumar, Ujjwal
    AGROCHIMICA, 2021, 65 (03): : 229 - 246
  • [8] Integrating agronomic practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while increasing the economic return in a rice-based cropping system
    Xia, Longlong
    Xia, Yongqiu
    Li, Bolun
    Wang, Jinyang
    Wang, Shuwei
    Zhou, Wei
    Yan, Xiaoyuan
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 231 : 24 - 33
  • [9] Greenhouse gas emissions from rice based cropping systems: Economic and technologic challenges and opportunities
    A. Datta
    K. S. Rao
    S. C. Santra
    T. K. Mandal
    T. K. Adhya
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2011, 16 : 597 - 615
  • [10] Greenhouse gas emissions from rice based cropping systems: Economic and technologic challenges and opportunities
    Datta, A.
    Rao, K. S.
    Santra, S. C.
    Mandal, T. K.
    Adhya, T. K.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2011, 16 (05) : 597 - 615