Efficacy of the cross-union protocol in the treatment of congenital tibial pseudarthrosis: a comparative study

被引:0
|
作者
Jing, Yanhui [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dahui [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Chunxing [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Zhiqiang [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Yueqiang [1 ,2 ]
Ning, Bo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Childrens Hosp, Natl Childrens Med Ctr, Wanyuan Rd 399, Shanghai 201102, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Childrens Hosp, Wanyuan Rd 399, Shanghai 201102, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia; Cross-union surgery; Child; Complication; OSTEOSYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-08257-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundCongenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia (CPT) is a rare pediatric condition presenting substantial challenges for orthopedic surgeons. Aiming to achieve bone union, with subsequent complications such as refractures being common. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the results of our intentional cross-union protocol and to compare these outcomes with those obtained from our previously used techniques.Materials and methodsSixteen patients, with a mean age of 4.8 years (range: 1-13.3 years), who were treated with the intentional cross-union protocol were included in Group (A) Eleven patients, with a mean age of 3.5 years (range: 1.3-7.6 years), who primarily underwent intramedullary rodding with bone graft, were included in Group (B) The intentional cross-union protocol involved cross-union of the tibia and fibula, autogenous iliac bone grafting, and the insertion of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) aimed at achieving tibia-fibula cross-union. Retrospective evaluation of serial radiographs was conducted, and the outcomes regarding union and any subsequent complications were analyzed.ResultsA total of 27 patients with CPT were included in the study. All 16 patients (100%) in Group A successfully achieved primary union. Among the 11 patients in Group B, only 4 cases achieved primary union, with a primary healing rate of 36.4%. Seven cases with delayed healing required 2-4 revision surgeries for final healing. The time to union was significantly shorter in Group A (3.37 +/- 0.64 months) compared to Group B (8.67 +/- 3.0 months). The cross-sectional area of union was also significantly larger in Group A (6.71 +/- 0.58 cm(2)) compared to Group B (1.18 +/- 0.19 cm(2)). In Group A, there were no cases of refracture, whereas in Group B, 7 cases (77.8%) experienced refracture, indicating a statistically significant difference.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that the Cross-union protocol is highly effective for achieving union and preventing refracture in CPT. With such significant improvement, it has notably altered the prognosis of this challenging condition.Level of evidenceIV.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Paley Cross-Union Protocol for Treatment of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia
    Paley, Dror
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 31 (02)
  • [2] Cross-Union Surgery for Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia
    Shannon, Claire E.
    Huser, Aaron J.
    Paley, Dror
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2021, 8 (07):
  • [3] Congenital tibial pseudarthrosis, changes in treatment protocol
    Shabtai, Lior
    Ezra, Eli
    Wientroub, Shlomo
    Segev, Eitan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2015, 24 (05): : 444 - 449
  • [4] Surgical treatment options for congenital pseudarthrosis of tibia in children: cross-union versus other options: a systematic review
    Rastogi, Anuj
    Agarwal, Anil
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2022, 31 (02): : 139 - 149
  • [5] The treatment of congenital tibial pseudarthrosis
    Lammens, J
    Truyen, J
    Bauduin, G
    Fabry, G
    ORTHOPADE, 2000, 29 (01): : 54 - 57
  • [6] Cross (X) union technique for treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT)
    Lippross, Sebastian
    Tsaknakis, Konstantinos
    Lorenz, Heiko M.
    Hell, Anna K.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2021, 124 (09): : 768 - 773
  • [7] Delayed presentation of congenital tibial pseudarthrosis and neurofibromatosis: a different union
    Hatton, Maxim J.
    Ly, Tho
    Noor, Saqib
    Gollogly, James G.
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2014, 8 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [8] Combination Treatment by Cross-Union of the Tibia and Fibula, Autogenic Iliac Bone Grafting, Reliable Fixation and Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for the Treatment of Refractory Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia
    Wu, Chunxing
    Zheng, Guizhou
    Wang, Dahui
    Paley, Dror
    Ning, Bo
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 42 (06) : E623 - E629
  • [9] INNERVATION AND FUNCTION OF HINDLIMB MUSCLES IN THE CAT AFTER CROSS-UNION OF THE TIBIAL AND PERONEAL NERVES
    GORDON, T
    STEIN, RB
    THOMAS, CK
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1986, 374 : 429 - 441
  • [10] Die Therapie der kongenitalen TibiapseudarthroseThe treatment of congenital tibial pseudarthrosis
    J. Lammens
    J. Truyen
    G. Bauduin
    G. Fabry
    Der Orthopäde, 2000, 29 (1): : 54 - 57