Environmental, energy, and economic (3E) assessment of viticulture systems

被引:0
|
作者
Dekamin, Majid [1 ]
Norooz-Valashedi, Reza [2 ]
Toranjian, Amin [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran
[2] Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran
[3] Department of Water and Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran
关键词
Climate change - Fertilizers - Life cycle assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-35575-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Given the current trends, it seems obvious that temperatures and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels will rise over the coming years. To deal with climate change, a gradual transition to more sustainable viticulture operations is required. It seems necessary to carry out accurate local studies for future projections. The purpose of the current study was to choose the best grape production system in Jowzan Valley, Malayer, Iran. This region was registered by FAO as a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System (GIAHS) in 2018. This study seeks to answer the question: if climate change has occurred in the Malayer region, which of the traditional and trellis systems is more sustainable from economic, energy, and environmental aspects? The sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) was used to project the climate parameters of Malayer in the past and the future. The output of climate models based on rainfall, temperature, and wind (as factors influencing grape yield) in the observation period of 1992–2021 (the base period) and forecasting the future period of 2021–2100 under three scenarios (SSP1-26, SSP2-45, and SSP5-85) were obtained. The determination of hotspots in terms of cost, energy, and environment for two production systems was done with the approaches of material and energy flow cost accounting (MFCA) and life cycle assessment (LCA). The results of these two approaches help us know which of the two systems are currently more sustainable in terms of economic, energy, and environmental aspects. Grape production in 1 hectare was chosen as a functional unit (FU). The system boundary included the foreground processes that the farmer was directly involved in managing. Grape data were collected in the crop year of 2021–2022 from the vineyards of Jowzan region. According to results, under SSP1-26, SSP2-45, and SSP5-85 scenarios, the annual mean temperature is expected to rise at rates of 0.27, 0.477, and 0.82 °C 10a−1 in the future (2021–2100), respectively. From an economic point of view, labor was recognized as the main input. By changing the system from traditional to trellis, production costs can be expected to be halved. The main hotspot in terms of negative products was the loss of grapes during production or harvesting. Such conditions were also true in terms of energy. From the environmental aspect, on-farm emissions and electricity were identified as hotspots. These effects are greatly reduced in the trellis system compared to the traditional system. In the case of changing the system from traditional to trellis, these effects can be reduced to a reasonable extent by improving the efficiency of irrigation and fertilizer distribution through the irrigation system. According to the results obtained from the climate scenarios as well as the results of the economic, environmental, and energy evaluation of the two production systems, it can be concluded that the use of the trellis system can be more sustainable than the traditional system. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:65446 / 65463
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic framework for energetic, environmental and economic (3E) assessment and design of polygeneration systems
    Ng, Kok Siew
    Hernandez, Elias Martinez
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2016, 106 : 1 - 25
  • [2] Energy, economic, and environmental (3E) assessment of the major greenhouse crops: MFCA-LCA approach
    Dekamin, Majid
    Sadeghimofrad, Toktamsadat
    Ahmadloo, Amir
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 31 (14) : 21894 - 21912
  • [3] Energy, economic, and environmental (3E) assessment of the major greenhouse crops: MFCA-LCA approach
    Majid Dekamin
    Toktamsadat Sadeghimofrad
    Amir Ahmadloo
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 21894 - 21912
  • [4] Energetic, Economic and Environmental (3E) Assessment and Design of Solar-Powered HVAC Systems in Pakistan
    Mehmood, Sajid
    Maximov, Serguey A.
    Chalmers, Hannah
    Friedrich, Daniel
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (17)
  • [6] Emergy, Environmental and Economic (3E) Assessment of Biomass Pellets from Agricultural Waste
    Deng, Yun
    Ran, Xueling
    Elshareef, Hussien
    Dong, Renjie
    Zhou, Yuguang
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [7] Energy, Economic and Environmental (3E) Analysis for an Optimal CSP Technology Integration in Morocco
    Ammari, Nabil
    Alami Merrouni, Ahmed
    Mendyl, Abderrahmane
    Chaabelasri, Elmiloud
    Weidinger, Tamas
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (12)
  • [8] Energy, economic and environmental (3E) analysis for the renewable jet fuel production process
    Hsu, Hsin-Wei
    Binyet, Emmanuel
    Chang, Yu-Hsuan
    Wang, Wei-Cheng
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 33 : 146 - 157
  • [9] Optimizing the insulation thickness of external wall by a novel 3E (energy, environmental, economic) method
    Rad, Ehsan Amiri
    Fallahi, Elmira
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 205 : 196 - 212
  • [10] Energy Retrofitting of a Buildings' Envelope: Assessment of the Environmental, Economic and Energy (3E) Performance of a Cork-Based Thermal Insulating Rendering Mortar
    Silvestre, Jose D.
    Castelo, Andre M. P.
    Silva, Jose J. B. C.
    de Brito, Jorge M. C. L.
    Pinheiro, Manuel D.
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (01)