Footprint of uncertainty in the context of Bow-tie risk tool using fuzzy logic

被引:0
|
作者
Silva, V. A. O. [1 ]
Santana, R. [1 ]
Tsukada, R. I. [1 ]
Vianna, S. S. V. [1 ]
Silva, F. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Chem Engn, Cidade Univ Zeferino Vaz,Ave Albert Einstein 500, BR-13083852 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Fuzzy logic; Process safety; Bow-tie; Mamdani inference; IN-PROCESS SAFETY; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; IDENTIFICATION; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110335
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Bow-tie method is a qualitative risk analysis tool known for its effectiveness in visualizing the relationships between causes, barriers, and consequences. In this paper, we present a novel approach to quantifying Bow-tie diagram outcomes by incorporating uncertainty in both input and output parameters. We utilize fuzzy inference to aggregate frequencies and probabilities of failure on demand (PFD). Two fuzzy logic systems are tested: the Type 1 Fuzzy Logic System (T1FLS), and the Interval Type 2 Fuzzy Logic System (IT2FLS), applied here for the first time. The primary innovation of this work lies in the application of IT2FLS, which introduces the concept of the footprint of uncertainty (FOU) to better account for uncertainty in the membership functions of linguistic variables. To validate these models, both were adjusted using expert knowledge to replicate the behavior of the Bow-tie combined with Layers of Protection Analysis (probabilistic model). Simulations compared the proposed methods to the probabilistic model, with sensitivity analyses examining variations in protection barrier failure probabilities. The T1FLS achieved a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 9.54%, while the IT2FLS reached 12.82%. For the normalized root mean square logarithmic error (NRMSLE), T1FLS yielded 4.65%, and IT2FLS 6.30%. The methods showed 87.32% similarity in ranking protection barrier sensitivity indices. The findings suggest both fuzzy systems exhibit strong potential for accurately representing complex systems with inherent uncertainties, making them valuable tools for risk analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining the bow-tie method and fuzzy logic using Mamdani inference model
    Almeida, Raphael Santana
    da Silva, Flavio Vasconcelos
    Vianna, Savio S. V.
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 169 : 159 - 168
  • [2] Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach
    Khakzad, Nima
    Khan, Faisal
    Amyotte, Paul
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 104 : 36 - 44
  • [3] Risk assessment of ship anchorage handling operations using the fuzzy bow-tie method
    Kaptan, Mehmet
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2021, 236 (236)
  • [4] Risk mitigation in unstabilized approach with fuzzy Bayesian bow-tie analysis
    Acarbay, Caner
    Kiyak, Emre
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 92 (10): : 1513 - 1521
  • [5] Coupling and footprint numerical features for a bow-tie antenna array
    Hernández-López, MA
    Quintillán-González, M
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 19 (06) : 779 - 794
  • [6] Risk analysis for confined space accidents onboard ship using fuzzy bow-tie methodology
    Sakar, Cenk
    Buber, Muge
    Koseoglu, Burak
    Toz, Ali C.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 263
  • [7] The risk assessment of a crude oil pipeline using fuzzy and bayesian based bow-tie analysis
    Jayan, Jishin T.
    Muthukumar, K.
    Renjith, V. R.
    George, Priscilla
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [8] Risk Assessment in Gas and Oil Pipelines Based on the Fuzzy Bow-tie Technique
    Heyrani, P.
    Baghaei, A.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, 2016, 6 (01) : 59 - U209
  • [9] Risk analysis of refining equipment based on fuzzy theory and bow-tie model
    Cai Shuang
    Hu Jinqiu
    Zhang Laibin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE 2016, 2016, : 9704 - 9711
  • [10] Bow-tie diagrams for risk management in anaesthesia
    Culwick, M. D.
    Merry, A. F.
    Clarke, D. M.
    Taraporewalla, K. J.
    Gibbs, N. M.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2016, 44 (06) : 712 - 718